Federal Courts claim a desire to maintain an appearance of integrity and independence. From judicial Cannon number 1. But do they really? Read this brief history and let me know if you think they’re failing. Please leave your thoughts in a reply at the end; your input would be greatly appreciated.
“A judge should maintain and enforce high standards of conduct and should personally observe those standards , so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved”
You will find on this blog numerous posts supporting the belief, the Agricultural reorganization act of 1994, signed into law by William Jefferson Clinton, was done to establish a criminal racketeering (RICO) enterprise within the Secretary of Agricultures Office; An office reporting directly to the President of the United States. See i.e In The War On You And Me
According to Congressional records, George H. W. Bush nominated Judge Edward J. Damich for an appointment to the Copyright Royalty Tribunal (CRT) on March 13, 1992, and on October 8, 1992, the nomination was returned to the President. The nomination was resubmitted on September 9,1992. I can find no government record that Judge Edward J.Damich was ever confirmed by the Senate for a position on the CRT. See. Nominations of Edward J. Damich
On March 9, 1993, Judge Edward J. Damich’s nomination to the CRT was withdrawn by the newly elected President William Jefferson Clinton. Two weeks to the day after a final decision in the Coleman v. Espy class action lawsuit against the USDA.
Judge Edward J. Damich CV has had a mysterious employment gap from March 1993 until 1995 when he became employed as Chief Intellectual Property Counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee. See Edward J. Damich US Court of Federal Claims
Chief Justice Sharon Prost was Chief Counsel of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate from 1993 to 2001. See. Sharon Prost, Chief Judge US Court of Appeals. Wouldn’t the Chief counsel on the judiciary had a say in the hiring of new counsel like Edward J. Damich?
Current Vice President Joe Biden was Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Kika de la Garza Texas Democrat and environmental advocate was Chairman of the Agricultural committee. John Conyers a Democrat and founding member of the Congressional Black Caucus, of which Mike Epsy was a member was ranking member on the Congressional Judiciary Committee, and the Chairman was Texas Democrat Jack Brooks.
The Congressional and Senate Judiciary committees would have played major roles in the passage of the Agricultural Reorganization Act of 1994. Or should we say the Agricultural RICO Act of 1994?
I sued the USDA for the operation of this RICO enterprise in 2013. To this day I seek the opportunity to present evidence of these allegations to a Jury of civilians. I allege that from 2013 to 2014 Senior Federal district court Judge Jackson L. Kiser railroaded my RICO filing with the specific intent to protect the USDA’s RICO enterprise from prosecution. See case 4:13-cv-00054-JLK CA4 14-1480, 14-1925, and Supreme Court Writ of Certiorari petition 14-1051. I call this case the Northfolk Southern Rico express. A judge has only to pen his name, to one major lie, to destroy the appearance of having any integrity. Judge Kiser’s Memorandum opinion is full of lies, denials of the law, and due process.
In November of 2015, I filed suit against the United States Government, precisely because, I believe Judge Jackson L. Kiser acted with the specific intent to aid and abet the USDA’s RICO enterprise in the commission of the racketeering operations objectives. See 1:15-cv-1344
The Judge assigned to this case was Judge Edward J. Damich, appointed to the court by William Jefferson Clinton, who again I allege railroaded this case, consequently, a writ of mandamus was filed with the Court of Appeals for the Federal District see CA1 16-122. See Mandamus Usurped Justice Usurped Impartial Hearing Denied
The Court of Appeals Federal District converted the writ of mandamus, to a request for appeal. See Mandamus Usurped Justice Usurped Impartial Hearing Denied. The appeal was assigned to Chief Justice Sharon Prost who was accompanied, by two new judges and again railroaded the case see CA1 16-1889. See Treason & The Good Ole Boy Network The ABA Within! and Federal Court Opinion Balances Scales of Justice With Lies I call this one The Pennsylvania Railroad express.
In response to the railroad of Case 16-1889, a petition for rehearing was submitted which I believe shows the ruling was not in accordance with Supreme Court precedent on the case. If the Court denies the petition or rules against it, the only remaining option is an expensive and highly unlikely appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States. One they would likely never grant, as the ruling would clearly not be in accordance with established law. See blog post Petition for Rehearing Denied.
Understand that it’s my firm belief, the Agricultural Reorganization Act of 1994 was the foundation for an Act of Treason against the American Farmer, the Constitution, and We The People. That the Senate and Congressional Judiciary committees would have been involved in the legislation passage. And Chief Justice Sharon Prost and Judge Edward J. Damich would likely have worked with the Senate Judiciary on the passage of this criminal, unconstitutional act of treason.
Do you believe for 1 second Judge Edward J. Damich and Chief Justice Sharon Prost can legitimately claim to have independence in these court proceedings? Does their involvement and participation in the implementation of the legislation alleged to be an act of treason not put the court’s integrity in question, by having them preside over proceedings?
A Railroad of criminal injustice never to see the light of media exposure. A railroad where the tracks of judicial integrity and independence of the judiciary are a train wreck and there’s no judicial accountability for criminal injustice. Today the judiciary continues to allow this criminal unconstitutional legislation to cause all manner of destruction to the life, livelihood, and property of America’s Farmers, the constitution, and “WE THE PEOPLE”. Most disturbing of all is the fact numerous members of the Supreme Court including Chief Justice John Roberts have expressed the opinion that a key component of the RICO’s racket; a reliance on judicial deference is unconstitutional.
As a patriot traitors and their families are the enemies, as are all those who aid and defend them.
Look for the Tweetsie Railroad already on the tracks See Wall of Injustice Street and Letter to Judge Robert J. Conrad August 29, 2016
Please note the court may not like my commentary as Judge Jackson L. Kiser made so clear, However, I do not have the power to change the law and nothing I say should have any bearing on its just administration!
Not a Pro Pro Se Per Se
Blue Ridge Springs,
Patriot Soldier of Misfortune.