Civil Rights Battle Against Whitey that Ultimately Imprisoned All Americans.

Civil Rights Battle Against Whitey that Ultimately Imprisoned All Americans.

Phillip Randolph

A. Philip Randolph in 1925 organized and led the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters, the first predominantly African-American labor union. In the early Civil Rights Movement and the Labor Movement, he was a voice that would not be silenced. His continuous agitation with the support of fellow labor rights activists against unfair labor practices in relation to people of color eventually led President Franklin D. Roosevelt to issue Executive Order 8802 in 1941, banning discrimination in the defense industries during World War II. The group then successfully pressured President Harry S. Truman to issue Executive Order 9981 in 1948, ending segregation in the armed services. One has to wonder if this fueled the power grab of the 1940’s by the federal judiciary. See: America’s Fail From Democracy to Oligarchy.

In 1954 the Brown v. Board of Education decision is regarded as having sparked the modern civil rights era when the Supreme Court rules deliberate public school segregation is illegal.

Charles Sherrod

In 1954, Charles “Sherrod first participated in sit-ins at white churches with the goal to desegregate them.[1] He was a key member and organizer of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) during the Civil Rights Movement. He became the first SNCC field secretary and SNCC director of southwest Georgia.[2] His leadership there led to the Albany Movement. He also participated in the Selma Voting Rights Movement and in many other arenas of the 1960s movement era.[3]

Rosa Parks

In 1955 Rosa Parks refuses to give up her bus seat to a white man. “Parks’ act of defiance and the Montgomery bus boycott became important symbols of the civil rights movement. She became an international icon of resistance to racial segregation. She organized and collaborated with civil rights leaders, including Edgar Nixon, president of the local chapter of the NAACP; and Martin Luther King, Jr., a new minister in Montgomery Alabama who gained national prominence in the civil rights movement.

At the time, Parks was secretary of the Montgomery chapter of the NAACP. She had recently attended the Highlander Folk School, a Tennessee center for training activists for workers’ rights and racial equality.”

Jack Brooks

In 1956 Republican Congressman Jack Brooks would refuse to sign The Declaration of Constitutional Principles (known informally as the Southern Manifesto) a document written in February and March 1956, originally authored by  Strom Thurmond and completed by Richard Russell in the United States Congress, in opposition to racial integration of public places. The manifesto was signed by 101 congressmen (99 Southern Democrats and two Republicans) from AlabamaArkansas, FloridaGeorgiaLouisianaMississippiNorth CarolinaSouth CarolinaTennesseeTexas, and Virginia

Herman Talmadge

“July, 23, 1956 No Senator from the South is so well equipped or so zealous to become the head and front of a sustained fight for segregation. ” as former Governor of Georgia Senator Herman Talmadge. “He is hampered by no entangling alliances. He does not have to pull his punches. He is committed exclusively to the preservation of what he would call “the Southern way of life.” Any changes which Washington may bring are likely to accentuate his single-mindedness and make him the choice and master spirit of racial reactionism in the Senate. His program of Southern solidarity advanced in You and Segregation will have a sounding-board in his Senate activities.” [4]

Richard M. Nixon

November 1960 and former Vice President Richard M. Nixon loses Presidential election to Senator John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts.

February 1, 1960,  Lunch counter sit-in by four college students in Greensboro, N.C. begins and spreads through the South. On April 17, 1960, the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) is founded by Ella Baker

1961, The Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) organizes Freedom Rides into the South to test new interstate Commerce Commissions regulations and court orders barring segregation in interstate  transportation. Riders are beaten by mobs in several places, including Birmingham and Montgomery, Alabama.[5] 

Charles Sherrod dropped out of college to become a full-time civil rights activists and member of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC). A supporter of racial integration, he recruited white as well as black members to assist with voter registration efforts. In 1961 he was among one of four students, along with Diane NashJ. Charles Jones, and Ruby Doris Smith, to drop out of college to become a full-time civil rights activists and members of SNCC. When the four students arrived in Rock Hill, they almost immediately engaged in sit-ins to fight back against segregation. After only one day in Rock Hill all four of the college students were arrested because of a sit-in they participated in, at a local diner. Like many activists, the students at the time chose jail with bail in an attempt to overcrowd the jails. They were sentenced to 30 days hard labor, however, Charles Sherrod did not take bail. Charles Sherrod was one of the first to practice the “jail- no bail” strategy.[6] [7 Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee] 

Author Tom Hayden

Tom Hayden’s “introduction to virulent southern racism came in 1961 when he ventured to Albany, Georgia, first to write an article about the Deep South organizing done by the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee [SNCC] and, second, to become a freedom rider on a train to Albany that December.

It was then he met, and came to admire, a brave young civil rights worker named Charles Sherrod, whom everyone in the movement simply called “Sherrod.” Albany was a segregated town near Plains, Georgia, and the home of Hamilton Jordan who went on to become Jimmy Carter’s chief of staff. Sherrod was the kind of front-line young militant who eventually brought about the New South of Carter, Bill Clinton and Al Gore, among others. Sherrod had to face violence, and the possibility of death, every day in his effort to mobilize young people and their parents against the suffocation of fear.

Shirley Miller Sherrod

Sherrod, and his equally committed wife Shirley, made a conscious decision to stay in rural Georgia long after the voting rights laws were passed and the national media departed. I left Albany after my two brief and harrowing experiences in 1961, and never returned until I spoke at commemoration of the Albany civil rights movement a few years ago. The Sherrods were still there. She was engaged in programs supporting rural farmers, while he had served on the city council and was a minister in a nearby state prison. There were 500 people at the event, the stalwarts of the past.

January, 1962 the Albany movement responded with an intensified boycott of city buses, and the bus company was forced out of business.

So Shirley Sherrod’s life cannot be reduced by a dishonest and amoral right-wing blogger into a few seconds of videotape 25 years old. She is one of many thousands who had the force of character to face racist abuse, and seemingly immovable state power, when they were demonized and disenfranchised. They were the trees standing by the water, and they would not be moved. They tried to bring their morality to politics, not accept the politics of Machiavelli.” [8]

Albany now began a new round of encounters between Negro demands and official intransigence. A few days after the bus incident, Sherrod and Charles Jones were arrested for sitting in the Trailways lunchroom. Shortly after that the City Commission turned down the Albany Movement’s petition for a redress of grievances. And in March the trial of the original “Freedom Riders” arrested on December 10 began.

As Charles Sherrod entered the courtroom to attend that trial, he walked to the “white section” in the front , and was immediately knocked to the floor by Chief Deputy Sheriff Lamar Stewart, who then pulled him back to the rear of the courtroom. When Bob Zellner, Tom and Sandra Hayden, and Per Laursen sat down next to Sherrod in the “Negro section,” deputies pounced on them and dragged them out of the courtroom. Judge Carl E. Crow, watching all of this, told newsmen, “The officers were enforcing a rule of the court.” SNCC The Abolitionist Pg 134, 35

Cesar Chavez

1962, The United Farm Workers Union, under the leadership of Cesar Chavez, organizes to win bargaining power for Mexican Americans.

“James Meredith becomes the first African American student admitted to the University of Mississippi.” [9]

In April 1962 there was more trouble. Dr. Anderson, Slater King, Emanuel “Bo” Jackson, and Elijah Harris, four leaders of the Albany Movement, were found guilty of “disorderly conduct” for picketing downtown as part of a general boycott of stores which did not hire Negro employees. Also, Charles Jones, Cordell Reagan, and two others were sentenced to sixty days on work gangs for refusing service. And twenty-six more people were arrested in lunch counter sit-ins.

Martin Luther King Jr.

July 1962, national attention came to Albany again when Martin Luther King, Jr., and Ralph Abernathy, called back to stand trial for leading the parade in December, were found guilty in Recorders Court and sentenced to forty-five days. Defense Attorney Donald Hollowell asked Judge Durden for legal citations on which his decision was based. He said he didn’t have any, but that it was based on “general research of the law.” 

With King’s arrest, Washington officialdom got busy as it had never done before in the Albany crisis, and somehow, through the payment of the fine by an unidentified man, King and Abernathy were released. They had wanted to stay in jail to continue dramatizing the Albany situation, but now they reluctantly left. Abernathy told a mass meeting that night: “I’ve been thrown out of lots of places in my day, but never before have I been thrown out of jail.” 

In November 1962 a special election was held in Massachusetts to fill the Senate seat vacated by John F. Kennedy who’d become President. The seat was won by his 30 year old brother Edward Moore “Ted” Kennedy. Ted Kennedy was re-elected to a 6 year term in 1964 and later re-elected seven more times.   

John F. Kennedy

1963 June 11, President John F. Kennedy in his Report to the American People on Civil Rights asked for legislation “giving all Americans the right to be served in facilities which are open to the public—hotels, restaurants, theaters, retail stores, and similar establishments”, as well as “greater protection for the right to vote”. Kennedy delivered this speech following the immediate aftermath of the Birmingham campaign and the growing number of demonstrations and protests throughout the southern United States. 

Kennedy was moved to action following the elevated racial tensions and wave of black riots in the spring of 1963. Republican Congressman Jack Brooks of Texas as ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee would help write the Civil Rights Act”

Where is Sherrod?

“Brooks was elected to the U.S. Congress in 1952, where he served for the next five decades. As a member of the influential Texas congressional delegation, Brooks became a close friend of powerful House Speaker Sam Rayburn and Senate Majority Leader Lyndon B. Johnson during the 1950s. He was a regular member of Speaker Rayburn’s “Board of Education,” a close group of congressional supporters.

June 20,1963, President John F. Kennedy meets with civil rights leaders, Future Congressmen from Georgia, John Lewis, Rev Martin Luther King, Jr. Rabbi Joachim Prinz, Rev. Eugene Carson Blake, and A. Philip Randolph at the White House in an attempt to call off the March on Washington scheduled for August.

Bayard Rustin

 A. Philip Randolph was the head of the March on Washington, which was organized by Bayard Rustin, on August 28, 1963 the March on Washington took place at which Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. delivered his “I Have A Dream” speech.  In the early Civil Rights Movement and the Labor Movement. The purpose of the march was to advocate for the civil and economic rights of African Americans and show support for President Kennedy’s Civil Rights Act. In front of the Lincoln Memorial, Martin Luther King would deliver his historic “I have a Dream” speech in which he called for an end to racism. The march on Washington is credited with helping to pass the Civil Rights Act.

Lyndon B. Johnson

On November 22, 1963, Brooks rode in the motorcade carrying President John F. Kennedy, Vice President Johnson, and many members of the Texas congressional delegation through downtown Dallas. Following Kennedy’s assassination, Brooks was on Air Force One for Lyndon B. Johnson’s swearing-in. He then flew with the new president, Lady Bird Johnson, and Jacqueline Kennedy back to Washington, D.C. During the Johnson Administration, Brooks remained a strong supporter of President Johnson and his legislative program. Throughout Johnson’s presidency, Brooks and his wife Charlotte dined with the Johnson family at the White House on a weekly basis.” [10]

Lester Maddox

Lester Maddox’s refusal to adjust to changes following the passage on July 2, 1964 of the Civil Rights Act manifested itself when he filed a lawsuit to continue his segregationist policies. Maddox said that he would close his restaurant rather than serve African Americans. An initial group of black demonstrators came to the restaurant but did not enter when Maddox informed them that he had a large number of black employees. On July 3, 1964 day after passage of the Civil Rights Act more African Americans attempted to enter the restaurant. Maddox confronted the group with a bare pickaxe handle.[11] Maddox provides the following account of the events:

Maddox with a gun July 3, 1964

Mostly customers, with only a few employees, voluntarily removed the twelve Pickrick Drumsticks [a euphemism for pickaxe handles] from the nail kegs on each side of the large dining room fireplace. They had been forewarned by the arrival of Atlanta’s news media of an impending attempted invasion of our restaurant by the racial demonstrators and once the demonstrators and agitators arrived, the customers and employees pulled the drumsticks [pickaxe handles] from the kegs and went outside to defend against the threatened invasion.12]

Photo from CNN.com Inside Politics June 25, 2003

Marker at the spot of the Pickrick at Georgia Tech

The “invasion” Maddox referred to above was three black Georgia Tech students who had asked to be seated.[13]

Maddox gained the approval of segregationists by leasing and then selling the restaurant to employees rather than agreeing to serve black customers. He claimed that the issue was not hostility to blacks, but constitutional property rights. He even built a monument to “private property rights” near the restaurant.[14]

The Civil Rights Digital Library at the University of Georgia contains the following account of the closing of his restaurant:

Maddox closed the Pickrick on August 13, and reopened the business on September 26 as the Lester Maddox Cafeteria, where he pledged to serve only “acceptable” Georgians. During a trial for contempt of court on September 29, Maddox argued against the charges because he was no longer offering service to out-of-state travelers or integrationists. On February 5, 1965 a federal court ruled that Maddox was in contempt of court for failing to obey the injunction and assigned fines of two hundred dollars a day for failing to serve African Americans. Maddox ultimately closed his restaurant on February 7, 1965, rather than integrate it; he claimed that President Lyndon Johnson and communists put him out of business.[15]

The building was purchased by Georgia Tech in 1965; it was used for many years as the placement center, and was later known as the Ajax building.[16][17] It was demolished in May, 2009.

March 15, 1965 a black farmer Hosie Miller and Baptist deacon died ten days after he was shot during a livestock dispute with Cal Hall, a white neighbor, in Newton, Georgia.

Shirley Sherrod, revealed her version of the events shortly after the controversy surrounding her resignation as Georgia State Director of Rural Development for the United States Department of Agriculture.[18][19][20] Shirley [Millers Daughter] reported that Miller, who owned 500 acres (2.0 km2) in Baker County, Georgia on which he grew corn, cotton and peanuts, would sometimes argue with Hall, whose cows would wander into her family’s pasture.[21] She said that Hall confronted Miller about six or seven cows Miller claimed belonged to him.[22][23] According to Sherrod, when Miller told Hall that they could settle the matter in court, Hall shot Miller in front of three witnesses.[24][25]

The shooting occurred on the night of March 15, 1965 and, according to the death certificate, Miller died on March 25 from gunshot wounds to his chest, abdomen and liver.[26][27] Hall, who claimed he killed Miller in self-defense, was charged at least three times in connection with Miller’s death and a grand jury declined to prosecute him each time.[28]

Civil rights attorney C.B. King represented the Miller family in a civil suit against Hall seeking monetary damages for lost income, medical, and funeral costs.[29] King, asserting that the jury panel was predominately white despite the 1960 census showing that the majority of the county’s over 2,000 residents were black, attempted to have the Baker County Board of Jury Commissioners redraw jury lists.[30] Judge Emeritus Carl E. Crow went forward with the proceedings and on September 12, 1966, the jury found in favor of Hall.[31]

Grace Miller, Hosie Miller’s wife, said she was distantly related to Hall.[32] Hall died in 1976.[33]

In 1966, Charles Sherrod left the SNCC after its recently elected chairman Stokely Carmichael expelled white members. He moved north, to New York City, where he received his master’s degree in sacred theology from the Union Theological Seminary. He then returned home to direct the Southwest Georgia Project for Community Education with Shirley Sherrod. In 1969, Sherrod, his wife Shirley, and some other members of the Albany Movement helped pioneer the land trust movement in the U.S.,[34][35] co-founding New Communities, a collective farm in Southwest Georgia modeled on kibbutzim in Israel. [36]

“In 1969, New Communities received a planning grant from Office of Economic Activity OEO the agency responsible for administering most of the War on Poverty programs created as part of United States President Lyndon B. Johnson‘s Great Society legislative agenda. New Communities was encouraged to expect substantial funding for implementation, but Governor Lester Maddox would not permit further funds for the group to come into the state.” [37]

President Jimmy Carter

During this period, Jimmy Carter was motivated to oppose the political climate of racial segregation and support the growing civil rights movement. He became an activist within the Democratic Party. Carter was in favor of racial tolerance and integration—at one point, the local White Citizens’ Council boycotted his peanut warehouse when he refused to join them—but he often kept those feelings to himself to avoid making enemies. By 1961 he was a prominent member of the community and the Baptist Church as well as chairman of the Sumter County school board, where he began to speak more loudly in favor of school integration.[38] A state Senate seat was opened by the dissolution of Georgia’s County Unit System in 1962; Carter announced his run for the seat 15 days before the election. Rosalynn, who had an instinct for politics and organization, was instrumental to his campaign. The initial results showed Carter losing, but this was the result of fraudulent voting orchestrated by Joe Hurst, the Democratic Party chairman in Quitman County, with the aid of the Quitman County sheriff.[39] Carter challenged the results; when fraud was confirmed, a new election was held, which he won.[40] The civil rights movement was well underway when Carter took office. He and his family had become staunch John F. Kennedy supporters.

In 1966 Carter ran for Governor of Georgia the result was a sharp blow to Carter, who was left deeply in debt. His attempt to rescue the race from Callaway had resulted in the unlikely election of the segregationist Lester Maddox, which he considered an even worse outcome.[41] Carter served in the Georgia State Senate, and in 1970, he was elected as Governor of Georgia, defeating former Governor Carl Sanders in the Democratic primary on an anti-segregation platform advocating affirmative action for ethnic minorities. That same year Lester Maddox would win election to  Lieutenant Governor of Georgia.

Montesquieu

From these historic accounts of history, it’s known, Charles & Shirley Sherrod were founding members in the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, Charles spent thirty days in jail protesting a sentence for participating in a lunch counter sit-in in Rock Hill South Carolina, Tom Hayden ventured to Albany Georgia in December 1961 to become a freedom rider on a train to Albany where he met Charles Sherrod. Charles Sherrod’s Freedom ride activism that December brought him to a court appearance before Judge Carl E. Crow.

In 1964 a group of black demonstrators came to the restaurant of Lester Maddox but did not enter when Maddox informed them that he had a large number of black employees. By any chance did SNCC Charles and Shirley Sherrod precipitate, or participate in the sit-in of Maddox Pickrick restaurant? Lester Maddox closed the restaurant on February 7, 1965, rather than integrate it. On March 15, 1965, a black farmer and Shirley Sherrod’s father Hosie Miller Baptist deacon died ten days after he was shot during a livestock dispute with Cal Hall, a white neighbor. Every attempt to hold Hall accountable for the murder was blocked by whites and the same judge Sherrod had faced regarding the December Albany freedom rides in which Martin Luther King and Ralph Abernathy had participated Judge Carl E. Crow.

In 1966, Charles & Shirley Sherrod were married and left the SNCC after its recently elected chairman Stokely Carmichael expelled white members and Jimmy Carter lost his bid for Governor to Lester Maddox. At the time John Lewis was the youngest of the “Big Six” leaders as chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. Had the run in at the Pickrick with Lester Maddox resulted in the murder of Shirley’s father, the expelling of white members in the SNCC, Jimmy Carter’s losing to Lester Maddox. Did Charles and Shirley depart to New York where he pursued a master’s degree in sacred theology as a non violent response to these events?

Albany a segregated town between Plains and Newton Georgia, home of Hamilton Jordan, Jimmy Carter, Charles an Shirley Sherrod, and Hoosie Miller respectfully. Carter a farmer in Plains Georgia and prominent member of the Baptist Church. Charles Sherrod a baptist minister first participated in sit-ins at white churches with the goal to desegregate them. Hoosie Miller Shirley’s father a black farmer and baptist deacon. Jimmy Carter a baptist politician, a staunch supporter of Civil Rights, and affirmative action. Charles a baptist minister with the SNCC involved in voter registration and non violent activism. Is it likely that Charles and Shirley worked to get out the vote in support of Jimmy Carter’s political efforts?

Having returned to Georgia in 1969 and after the murder of Martin Luther King did Charles and Shirley work on getting out the vote for Jimmy Carter’s winning bid for Governor in 1970? Is there any question Jimmy Carter, Lester Maddox, Charles and Shirley Sherrod, Hoosie Miller, John Lewis, and the minister from Georgia Martin Luther King were all acquainted?

In 1969 did the relevant past of these events play a significant role in Lester Maddox blocking the Sherrod’s funding for the development of New Communities? Do you think perhaps once Jimmy Carter became Governor he attempted to help the Sherrods? Did Maddox as Lieutenant Governor stop him?

This one battle and its aftermath leads to the elimination of The People’s Constitutional Rights to Due Process by Senator Joe Biden, the Brutus of 1990, turning America into an oligarchy controlled by a Government king selling out to the highest bidder after Citizens United. See post Americas Fail From Democracy to oligarchy.

And if the chance of one battle—that is, a particular cause—has brought a state to ruin, some general cause made it necessary for that state to perish from a single battle. In a word, the main trend draws with it all particular accidents. – Montesquieu.

Justice; Chief Justice John Roberts!

Justice; Chief Justice John Roberts!

Chief Justice John Roberts,

Justice Louis Brandeis known as the peoples judge said “Decency, security and liberty alike demand that government officials shall be subjected to the rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen” No man is above the law so the confirmation hearings say.

Today Executive branches of the U.S. government are running criminal enterprises in violation of Federal laws, federal antitrust laws, and the Constitution. Three times I previously brought this matter to the attention of then President Barack Obama. Please refer to the correspondence which can be found on this blog. None of the communications was ever addressed.

Congress approved the implementation of these enterprises in violation of the Constitution and their oaths of office. Consequently, they do not want their despicable deeds exposed. I have multiple times by mail and phone requested of Congressman Morgan Griffth the opportunity to address Congress regarding this matter.  No request was ever acknowledged. You may also refer to written correspondence evidenced in this blog.

These enterprises are specifically designed for the obstruction of justice, to deny due process, to deny equal protection, and to deny fair hearings. These procedures are an absolute abysmal affront to Due Process, American values, and the Constitution.

Three times I’ve brought these allegations into Federal Courts with the filing of Civil Lawsuits. For Five years Government has refused to allow a fair hearing on these matters. Each dismissed by corrupt federal officials who’ve used lies, deceit, deception and down right criminal acts to subvert these allegations. Enough is Enough as Clarence Thomas Said When Anita Hill lied, I purpose to aid the treason afoot.

If anyone has any doubts Federal Judges lied about material evidence against the USDA’s racketeering enterprise to aid, abet, and protect the Governments treason, I respectfully request you look at the evidence presented in other post on this blog, Here is a list of post to start with: Please leave your opinion in the comments.

Corrupt Federal District Court Of Federal District Judge Jackson L. Kiser – Traitor

Dumb and Dumber, Judges Don’t Know English!

Federal Court Opinion Balances Scales of Justice With Lies!

If you want to know about the implementation of this criminal enterprise and the treason that created it. You can read about that here.

Thomas Jefferson Explains Path to Oligarchy! William Jefferson Clinton Perfects It!

Treason & The Good Ole Boy Network; The ABA Within!

And don’t forget to check out other links to evidence.

The Federal Judiciary is aiding, abetting, and protecting these criminal enterprises and even gifting them with the ability to write new laws at will avoiding accountability for criminal and civil violations of Federal law against the people they’re supposed to serve. See the Statements of the Supreme Court on deference made over the last five years in the Courts rulings. See the Separation of powers Restoration Act which implements the recommendations Justice Antonin Scalia made to congress to eliminate the treason afoot by Government Agencies many years ago.

These acts Sir are in violation of the government’s contractual obligation to operate legally and within the law. These acts are a complete and utterly criminal violation of the Constitutions intent for the separation of powers. These acts Sir have the Government warring against the Constitution and against the American people. These acts Sir, are acts of treason as defined by the Constitution of the United States.

As you should now beware, Sir, these criminal, unAmerican, and unconstitutional allegations, allege a criminal conspiracy of wrongdoing by every branch of the US Government. It’s a tenant of the rule of law that no man may preside over his own case. I, therefore, submit that this case must be heard against the US Government by a Jury of the American people and its criminal operations must be stopped.

The rule of law states: The Law should govern a nation as opposed to being governed by the arbitrary decisions of individual government officials. The Judiciary has repeatedly corruptly, maliciously, relied solely on arbitrary decisions of corrupt Government officials in the judiciary aiding, abetting, and protecting the Government’s criminal and unconstitutional RICO enterprises. They’re guilty of Treason by conspiring, aiding, and abetting domestic enemies of the Constitution and the American people.

This country is founded on the rule of law. If it’s to be governed by the rule of law then All branches of Government must stand trial as defendants and defend themselves before a jury of unbiased civilian jurist.

To Quote Thomas Jefferson:

“Trial by jury is the only anchor yet ever imagined by man, which can hold a government accountable to the principles of its constitution.”

John Adams called trial by Jury:

“the heart of liberty.”

James Madison said:

“Trial by jury in civil cases is as essential to secure the liberty of the people as any one of the pre-existent rights of nature”

As Justice Brandeis said:

“A government of laws will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. If a government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for the law; it invites every man to come a law unto himself. It invites anarchy.”

The prophecy of Edlbridge Gerry  declining to sign the Constitution and the warnings of Thomas Jefferson in 1820 are proven accurate.

How Sir can I, can any of us, have anything but contempt for a judiciary that’s aiding, abetting, and protecting illegal and unconstitutional operations of the people’s government? How should I, or any of us, not have contempt for a Government operating above the law and against justice for its people? The American people cannot address Government Corruption in Corrupted Courts under their control. The people should awaken to fact corruption permeates the  Judiciary and it should no longer be allowed to Judge itself in dismissing facts.

This petition is made pursuant to the First Amendment to the Constitution the right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The Government is not entitled to immunity in this matter because its sovereignty cannot supersede the Government’s agency requirements as defined, by the Constitution, by the Contract, which gave rise to the existence of Government, a contract which requires Government to operate legally and within the law.

I cite and incorporate for reference and submit as evidence the Judiciary is criminally corrupt all procedural records of filings, appeals, including the appeal to the supreme court, writs, the dockets, and all supporting documentation, including the actual dockets for the following cases.: 4:13-cv-0054, 1-15-1544C, and 3-16-cv-173. That is, an honest factual assessment of all filings in these cases will suffice to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the Government is guilty of treason.

The courts are thus aware of the evidence against them and the allegations of the criminal enterprises as complained of in the aforementioned cases. They may not preside over nor dismiss a case against them without a proper and fair hearing. Since the complaint alleges criminal wrongdoing and conspiracy by the judiciary, including the willful intent to obstruct justice. The judiciary has neither the right nor the Authority to dismiss this case. Plaintiff demands the US Government including the Judiciary stand trial for TREASON! Before a Jury of American Citizens.

Failure of the Judiciary to defend itself before a Jury is admission this country is no longer founded or governed by the rule of law but is in fact under the rule of a Criminal enterprise of despots and traitors.

Please readers watch this Facebook post its all related to the Treason i’ve been fighting.

https://www.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fjlecenarro%2Fvideos%2F1538558802878659%2F&show_text=0&width=560

The Traitor Federal District Court Judge Jackson L. Kiser is now railroading another case. This one a young man who’s fighting to prove his innocence and having his every effort to gain access to the evidence to exonerate him criminally obstructed. See:

The Case of Brian Hill

 

No one in a Republic is above the law, above the supreme law; not even the judiciary!

 

Sincerely,
Christopher B. Julian Pro Se.
980-254-1295

Judging the Judges of a Judge.

Judging the Judges of a Judge.

You should be paying attention. What’s presented in the Court of Appeals Federal District Case 16-1889 , is a case before the second highest court in America, where the questions are; whether the Federal Government is liable for criminal acts of a Federal Judge who’s violated a legislative promise to the American people to hold Government accountable to the law, and whether the Federal Judiciary will protect, hold accountable, or should judge, a Superior Federal District Court Judge for aiding and abetting the USDA ‘s criminal enterprise, protecting it from prosecution.

I say, If not, there’s no case in America where the judiciary will hold a member of the judicial corp. accountable, and the judicial system is quite simply corrupt and the rule of law in America meaningless. The results are in see: Petition for Rehearing Denied

Plaintiffs claims are a request the Court of Federal Claims review whether Governments employee “ Federal Superior District Judge Jackson L. Kiser violated the Plaintiffs procedural due process rights and failed faithfully to perform his duty as an agent / trustee affecting a breach of contract or taking of personal property conveyed to Plaintiffs by an act of Congress “Title 18 Chapter 96 §1964(c)”. Rights granted by legislation with the specific intent to appoint the plaintiff as a prosecutor for the express purpose of prosecuting Government corruption “the USDA’s RICO enterprise”, in a Government agency violating the fundamental laws of this Nation “ the due process and equal justice clauses of the constitution of the United States, in a prosecutorial void “ The DOJ defends Government Agencies even criminal ones”, where the Governments action “The Actions of Federal employee Superior Federal District Court Judge Jackson L. Kiser aided and abetted the Government “ The USDA’s RICO enterprise” in avoiding prosecution and effected the Governments “USDA’s” will to unconstitutionally write new law “ Usurping the legislators and the Judiciary” while preserving the Governments “USDA’S” criminal and corrupt objectives [1] as a criminal abusive tyrant.

Its all just one big  happy Government Criminal Racket however, the Legislative intent was to prevent judicial collusion by creating a civil cause of action for a criminal offense placing the verdict in the hands of a Jury and not the Judiciary.

Under the Tucker act the Supreme Court Stated in United States v. Navajo Nation, 556 U.S. 287, 290 (2009). a Plaintiff  “must identify a substantive source of law that establishes specific fiduciary or other duties, and allege that the Government has failed faithfully to perform those duties.”  “If that threshold is passed, the court must then determine whether the relevant source of substantive law `can fairly be interpreted as mandating compensation for damages sustained as a result of a breach of the duties [the governing law] impose[s].'”

Due Process and the Equal Protection clause of the Constitution are substantive sources of law, and impose a  agency / fiduciary duty on a Judge, to abide by the law, his oath of office, his judicial cannons, the federal rules of civil procedure, and in this instant case a fiduciary duty is imposed on him to protect the property rights, treble damages, attorney fees, and court cost that flow from the Plaintiffs economic damages and the restitution promised by statute  18 U.S.C.§1964(c) for bringing suit against the U.S. Government for racketeering.

  1. Judge Jackson L. Kiser breached his fiduciary duty by dismissing the charges for failure to state a claim while denying a single amendment to the Complaint  by a Pro -Se his court instructed not to make legal arguments, cite cases, or statutes. This in a case alleging a government conspiracy to deny due process and equal justice, A felony and when done as a racket an act of treason on the constitution and the American People. How serious did Judge Jackson L.Kiser take his oath to uphold the law and the constitution?
  2. The Statute promises treble damages, Attorney Fees, and court cost to the successful litigant. The supreme court has stated these are economic damages for economic injury see Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates][107 S.Ct. 2759, 483 U.S. 143, 151 (1987)] : “RICO and the Clayton Act are designed to remedy economic injury by providing for the recovery of treble damages, costs, and attorney’s fees. Where the Federal government is the defendant it  can fairly be interpreted as mandating compensation by the Federal Government.”

There’s a solid  case Judge Jackson L. Kiser failed faithfully to perform his fiduciary and agency duties in the application of a federal statute which can fairly be interpreted as mandating treble damages, court cost, and attorney’s fees as compensation by the Federal Government. Understand Judge Jackson L. Kiser Lied. He made up alibis and manipulated the true nature of the evidence to dismiss the charges in the first place. see:Corrupt Federal District Court Of Federal District Judge Jackson L. Kiser – Traitor

So far the Court has not acted as a neutral adjudicator but as an attorney for the defense of the U.S Governments criminal operations like a Judiciary criminally protecting organized crime.

[1] As an Article I court, the duty of Congresses separation of powers responsibility, to hold the Federal Judiciary accountable has been conveyed to the Court of Federal Claims. The Courts Duty is to render justice against the Government in favor of citizens just as it would administer between private individuals. It just takes one bad apple corp. to spoil the whole bushel.

For more on this topic see:Federal Court Opinion Balances Scales of Justice With Lies. And Integrity & Independence in the Federal Judiciary.

 

CBJulian

@blueridgesprings

Blueridgesprings.wordpress.com

Not a Pro Pro-Se Per Se.

Integrity & Independence in the Federal Judiciary ?

Integrity & Independence in the Federal Judiciary ?

Federal Courts claim a desire to maintain an appearance of integrity and independence. From judicial Cannon number 1. But do they really ? Read this brief history and let me know if you think they’re failing. Please leave your thoughts in a reply at the end; your input would be greatly appreciated.

“A judge should maintain and enforce high standards of conduct and should personally observe those standards , so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved”

You will find on this blog numerous post supporting the belief, the Agricultural reorganization act of 1994, signed into law by William Jefferson Clinton, was done to establish a criminal racketeering (RICO) enterprise within the Secretary of Agricultures Office; An office reporting directly to the President of the United States. See i.e In The War On You And Me

According to Congressional records George H. W. Bush nominated Judge Edward J. Damich for an appointment to the Copyright Royalty Tribunal (CRT) on March 13, 1992 and on October 8, 1992, the nomination was returned to the President.The nomination was resubmitted on September 9,1992.  I can find no government  record Judge Edward J.Damich was ever confirmed by the Senate for a position on the CRT. See. Nominations of Edward J. Damich

On March 9, 1993 Judge Edward J. Damich nomination to the CRT was withdrawn by the newly elected President William Jefferson Clinton. Two weeks to the day after a final decision in the Coleman v. Espy class action lawsuit against the USDA.

Judge Edward J. Damich CV has a mysterious employment gap from March 1993 until 1995 when he became employed as Chief Intellectual Property Counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee. See Edward J. Damich US Court of Federal Claims

Chief Justice Sharon Prost was Chief Counsel of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate from 1993 to 2001. See. Sharon Prost, Chief Judge US Court of Appeals. Wouldn’t Chief counsel on the judiciary had a say in the hiring of new counsel like Edward J. Damich? 

Current Vice President Joe Biden was Chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, Kika de la Garza Texas Democrat and environmental advocate was Chairman of the Agricultural committee. John Conyers a Democrat and founding member of the Congressional Black Caucus, of which Mike Epsy was a member was a ranking member on the Congressional Judiciary Committee, and the Chairman was Texas Democrat Jack Brooks.

The Congressional and Senate Judiciary committees would have played major roles in the passage of the Agricultural Reorganization Act of 1994.  Or should we say the Agricultural RICO Act of 1994?

I sued the USDA for the operation of this RICO enterprise in 2013. To this day I seek the opportunity to present evidence of these allegations to a Jury of civilians.  I allege that from 2013 to 2014 Senior  Federal district court Judge Jackson L. Kiser railroaded my RICO filling with specific intent to protect the USDA’s RICO enterprise from prosecution. See case 4:13-cv-00054-JLK CA4 14-1480, 14-1925,and Supreme Court Writ of Certiorari petition 14-1051. I call this case the Northfolk Southern Rico express. A judge has only to pen his name, to one major lie, to destroy the appearance of having any integrity. Judge Kiser’s Memorandum opinion is full of lies, denials of the law, and due process.

In November of 2015 I filled suit against the United States Government, precisely because, I believe Judge Jackson L. Kiser acted with specific intent to aid and abet the USDA’s RICO enterprise in the commission of the racketeering operations objectives. See 1:15-cv-1344

The Judge assigned to this case, was Judge Edward J. Damich, appointed to the court by William Jefferson Clinton, who again I allege railroaded this case, consequently, a writ of mandamus was filed with the Court of Appeals for the Federal District see CA1 16-122. See Mandamus Usurped Justice Usurped Impartial Hearing Denied

The Court of Appeals Federal District converted the writ of mandamus, to a request for appeal. See Mandamus Usurped Justice Usurped Impartial Hearing Denied.The appeal was assigned to  Chief Justice Sharon Prost who was accompanied, by two new judges and again railroaded the case see CA1 16-1889. See Treason & The Good Ole Boy Network The ABA Within!  and Federal Court Opinion Balances Scales of Justice With Lies I call this one The Pennsylvania Railroad express. 

In response to the railroad of Case 16-1889 a petition for rehearing was submitted which  I believe shows the ruling was not in accordance with Supreme Court precedent on the case. If the Court denies the petition, or rules against it, the only remaining option is an expensive and highly unlikely appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States. One they would likely never grant, as the ruling  would clearly not be in accordance with established law. See blog post  Petition for Rehearing Denied.

Understand that it’s my firm believe,  the Agricultural Reorganization Act of 1994 was  the foundation for an Act of Treason against the American Farmer , the Constitution, and We The People. That the Senate, and Congressional Judiciary committees would have been involved in the legislations passage. And Chief Justice Sharon Prost and Judge Edward J. Damich would likely have worked with the Senate Judiciary on the passage of this criminal, unconstitutional act of treason.

Do you believe for 1 second Judge Edward J. Damich and Chief  Justice Sharon Prost can legitimately claim to have independence in these court proceedings? Does their involvement and participation in the implementation of the legislation alleged to be an act of treason not put the courts integrity in question, by having them preside over proceedings ?

A Railroad of criminal injustice never to see the light of media exposure. A railroad where the tracks of judicial  integrity and independence of the judiciary are a train wreck and there’s no judicial accountability for criminal injustice. Today the judiciary continues to allow this criminal unconstitutional legislation to cause all manner of destruction to the life, livelihood, and property of Americas Farmers, the constitution, and  “WE THE PEOPLE”. Most disturbing of all is the fact numerous members of the Supreme Court including Chief Justice John Roberts have expressed the opinion that a key component of the RICO’s racket; a reliance on judicial deference is unconstitutional.

As a patriot traitors and there family are the enemy, as are all those who aid and defend them.

Look for  the Tweetsie Railroad already on the tracks See Wall of Injustice Street and Letter to Judge Robert J. Conrad August 29, 2016

Please note the court may not like my commentary as Judge Jackson L. Kiser made so clear, However, I do not have power to change the law and nothing I say should have any bearing on its just administration!

CBJulian

Not a Pro Pro Se Per Se

Blue Ridge Springs,

Patriot Soldier of Misfortune.

@blueridgespring

Blueridgesprings.wordpress.com

Blueridgesprings.com

Treason & The Good Ole Boy Network; The ABA Within!

Treason & The Good Ole Boy Network; The ABA Within!

Below is a slightly modified copy of the last filing in case 16-1889 in the Court of Appeals for the Federal District. This case is about a promise, stated in  U.S. Federal Law, to a Private citizen; willing, able, and with standing, to assume a job as a Private Attorney General to prosecute racketeering inside the U.S. Government, the Breach of that Promise by the U.S. Federal Judiciary which protected the rackets criminals, the enterprise, and effected commission of the rackets objectives.

The filling was limited to 5 type written pages this version has minor changes in red to assist the readers understanding or to provide additional details  on the subject for which the original lacked space and commentary.

Defendant (The Department of Justice) asserts in Dkt item 6 at II “Statement of Facts and Course Of Proceedings Below”  ¶2 (1) page 2 “the Court Of Federal Claims does not have Jurisdiction to” – “review due process claims;” A copy of the DOJ’s filing is linked here:

This is completely illogical! Prime tenants of Due Process include a fundamental principle of fairness in all legal matters, a requirement government operates legally and within the law, and the requirement “the King cannot create any offense by his prohibition or proclamation, which was not an offense before.”

The Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction “upon any express or implied contract with the United States 28 U.S.C §1491(1).

The most basic definition of a contract is a legally binding agreement enforceable by law. Given Due Process is fairness in legal matters and requires government operate within the law. Its simply implausible, if not impossible to breach or violate the terms of any express or implied contract without violating the doctrine of Due Process; without violating the law or legal terms of an agreement.

The very essence of this proceeding and the precursors, which ignited them, are firmly founded in a countless sequence of Due Process denial and the detrimental damages to the private property interest of a farmer.

When the Federal Government implements regulations, which constrict and limit the availability of credit, when it establishes itself a lender of last resort; with preferences for beginning farmers unable to obtain credit elsewhere, when a farmers life, livelihood, lifestyle, assets, and property are imperiled by a single available source of credit he has a property interest and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)/Farm Service Agency (FSA) has an a obligation to provide Due Process in evaluating a farmers loan application.

In the 1960’s and 70’s with bi-partisan legislative and executive support the USDA created a Sub-Prime loan bubble in farming and rural farms almost tripling farm size averages. In the late 70’s and early 80’s the bubble burst  and Government fueled devastation with free trade agreements, trade embargoes, significant and substantial reductions in credit availability; while the USDA began its own version of robo accelerating foreclosures. By 1985, an estimated 200,000 to 300,000 farmers were facing financial failure, farmland values dropped drastically for 1985 and 1986, the Farm Credit System ‘FCS’ institutions reported net losses of 2.7 billion and 1.9 billion respectively, the largest losses in history for any U.S. financial institution at the time. When it became apparent the financial viability of FCS was at risk, Congress stepped in to provide relief.

The USDA was besieged with loan requests from farmers unable to find credit elsewhere as private agricultural lenders failed in unprecedented numbers. The USDA was inundated with complaints by farmers, claiming mismanagement, Due Process violations in agency initiated foreclosures, failure and unwillingness to offer loan modifications in avoidance of foreclosure; overwhelmed with complaints, requests for assistance, and lawsuits; three key lawsuits ensued in the early 1980’s Matzke v. Block, Curry v. Block, and Coleman v. Block, followed by Coleman v. Lyng and Coleman v. Espy. These suits cemented Federal precedent farmers have a property interest, and the USDA a Due Process obligation.

Coleman v. Block’s 230,000 class members’ complaints were dismissed legislatively with the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987. Curry v. Block taught the USDA precedent could thwart abuse of deference and the follow on cases to Coleman v. Lyng and Coleman v. Espy that USDA denials of due process would have plaintiffs file complaints under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). Coleman v. Espy was decided almost a decade after origination on February 23, 1993, precisely two weeks to the day before newly elected President William Jefferson Clinton withdrew the nomination of Edward J. Damich to the Copyright Royalty Tribunal (CRT). These cases were the precursor, foundation, framework on which the USDA’s RICO schematic was designed. Judge Edward J. Damich resume gaps and career history coincide perfectly for having means, motive, opportunity as the presumptive architect of USDA’s legislation, policies, and procedural racket denying farmers these Due Process rights with passage of the Agricultural Reorganization Act of 1994, legislation which took bi-partisan congressional support to subvert the segregation of powers, and institutionalize in executive offices of Government. A scheme designed to obstruct justice, usurp judicial review, and rely on an abuse of unconstitutional deference.[Footnote 1]

Both republican and democratic administrations, presidents, and legislators contributed to the creation of the farm loan bubble, to its financial collapse; the second greatest decline in farms in American history, and the implementation of unconstitutional policies, procedures, and legislation to violate the constitutional rights of farmers. However, the greatest presidential culpability lies with Presidents, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, and Obama who did not respond to request under the Take Care Clause to address this unconstitutional criminal enterprise operating in his cabinet.

Appellants here and after referred to as the “Julian’s ” invested their life savings and in excess of half a million dollars in capital assets, farm land, equipment, and improvements; contributing in excess of 5 years of hard physical unpaid labor in the care, development, and rehabilitation of a farm, to prepare and establish a small farm winery business, and were relegated by Dodd Frank legislation to pursue a farm loan from the lender of last resort; the USDA/FSA. With their capital investment and significant investment of time, labor and commitment, having met requirements of eligibility for a beginning farmer, farm ownership loan, the Julian’s had a capital interest, a property interest, and a due process right to have their loan application handled with due care in accordance with USDA’s defined procedures.

USDA/FSA personnel were negligent, fraudulent, discriminatory, and committed a multitude of due process and criminal violations in processing of the Julian’s loan application without following USDA/FSA required procedures. In accordance with appeal rights the Julian’s mediation request was met with a vexatious denial of service; presumably at the direction of USDA counsel in the Department of Justice; Mediation itself is a scam used by USDA/FSA for discovery. The administrative appeals process is a racket designed to deny due process rights, fair and equal treatment, and obstruct justice, avoiding legal liability for criminal acts of USDA/FSA personnel, and their denial of due process in the handling of loan applications and farmer grievances.

The Julian’s pursued prosecution with a private right, specifically defined by congress to prosecute corruption in government, against the USDA’s RICO enterprise. The Federal Court instructed the Julian’s to file the complaint without citation of any cases, statutes, or legal argument; and then dismissed the RICO charges for failure to state a claim while denying a single opportunity to amend the complaint. The Judge Jackson L. Kiser substituted his opinion of what could be proved for what was pled, crafted alibi’s in direct contradiction to evidence, ignored constitutional challenges, and penned his signature to outright lies. This was done with bias, arbitrarily, capriciously, and not in accordance with the law, Due Process, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or Supreme Court precedent. The fourth circuit court of appeals placed a rubber stamp on this dismissal without comment and the Supreme Court denied cert.

The RICO statute is a promise, made as federal law in 18 U.S.C. §1964(c) to compensate a private citizen by paying them an attorney’s fee, cover their court cost, and compensate them with treble damages for recovery of economic losses resulting from damages to their business and property not a cause of action for torts.

The Julian’s filed suit in the court of federal claims for government’s breach of this promise. Government has repeatedly denied the Julian’s constitutional rights, to protect its criminal’s, and their unconstitutional enterprise from responsibility and accountability. In the Court of Federal Claims the Julian’s case was presided over by non other than Judge Edward J. Damich, who declined to commit in writhing he would abide by his oath of office, he would perform his duties, since he has no legal obligation to do so and is unlikely, as are members of this court to be held accountable for breaching their oaths’ to save government millions and protect the members of their corp.

Numerous Congressmen, Senators, Presidents, and Judges are culpable. There is not one single Justice sitting on the Federal District Appellate Court who’s impartiality is not in question as a result of life appointment by one of these culpable Presidents, and confirmation by Congressional and Senate judicial committee members who facilitated implementation of this unconstitutional criminal enterprise. And most if not all of these judges are guilty of granting agencies unconstitutional deference.

The President, Congress, Senate, and Judiciary in fact; every branch of the U.S. Government has culpability for crimes against the American farmer and violence against the U.S. Constitution in this matter. This case is truly the hundreds of thousands of farmers before, the tens of thousands after, the thousands annually deprived of Due process, fairness, and justice; by the USDA. It’s truly We The People v. Government.

The Due Process Clause requires “our system of law has always endeavored to prevent even the probability of unfairness. To this end, no man can be a judge in his own case.” In re Murchison, 349 U.S. at 136. “[T]o perform its high function in the best way,” the Supreme Court has said, “‘justice must satisfy the appearance of justice.’” Id. (quoting Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14 (1954)). As Thomas Jefferson said “trial by jury is the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution,” and in this case only a jury can provide the appearance of fairness to protect We The People from tyranny and oppression of Government where all branches have participated in its unconstitutional criminal operation.

Make no mistake America this is the Ole Boy Network of the Rich Criminally and Unconstitutionally repressing the Poor!

Submitted by,

Christopher B Julian Pro-Se

**************************************************************************************************************

July -21-2016 Major Update Congressional Action taken of Deference.

Thank you Congressmen Griffith!

House Bill 4768 addresses a significant legal issue abused by the USDA’s racketeering enterprise. I applaud you and the House of representatives in passing this legislative reform. This is precisely the kind of legislative reform needed to assists in addressing Executive overreach and protect the American people from Government turned tyrant.

My personal goals in pursuing legal action in the federal courts included overturning this precedent as unconstitutional.

I hope Congress will work further on dismantling the unconstitutional separation of powers granted by the Agricultural reorganization act of 1994. Passage of H.R 4768 and /S-2724 and signing by the President is of significant interest to me. Please let me know if I can perpetuate any grass root efforts to assist in having this legislative reform become law.

Thank you again for this legislation and its passage. Allowing Government agencies to create laws or amend them at will must end.

Sincerely,
Christopher B. Julian

**************************************************************************************************************

August 4 2016 – Major Update Court of Appeals for Federal District assigns Biased judicial Panel.

Today the case docket, case#16-1889 reflects the judicial panel selected to hear this case includes Chief Justice Sharon Prost. How very appropriate, since it so perfectly coincides with the Old Boy network theme of this post. You see Judge Sharon Prost was working with the Senate Judiciary committee at the same time as Edward J. Damich. She was also working with the committee when the committee to quote Justice Clarence Thomas attempted a “high tech lynching” of his career. I can’t prove it; but I can produce significant circumstantial evidence Anita Hill lied and Judge Thomas’s attempted lynching was perpetrated to entice passage of the civil rights act of 1991. That passage of this act was a key building block of the USDA’s racketeering enterprise; a key building block for the false flag cries of discrimination used in so many class action settlements, a key to limiting legal damage awards as this act capped damage awards for discrimination and sexual harassment. I believe the whole country would be interested to know if Anita Hill’s parents received a settlement in the USDA’s Piggford class action settlements. They were both farmers when the USDA’s sub prime farm loan bubble burst and Anita Hill went home. Was it to assist her large family financially?   There is no other Judge on the Court of Appeals for the Federal District who lacks the appearance of impartiality more than Judge Sharon Prost. Will she recuse herself? I previously pointed out this fact to Congressman Morgan Griffith in a letter to him on March 21, 2016 seeking a congressional hearing. A copy of that letter was also provided to the Department of Injustice defense counsel Melissa Baker. A copy of that letter can be read in at the bottom of blog post Mr. President You Are an imposter. Tell me again Mr. Comey the system isn’t rigged! Here’s a snapshot of the docket which shows the judicial assignment. Docket 

The Federal Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed this case for breach of contract against the Federal Government. The Court said in its opinion there is no indication the legislature intended for the Federal Government to be contractually bound by its promise to compensate a private citizen to assume the role of a prosecutor. This despite the fact  the Supreme Court has reiterated countless times the law in question makes these offers as an inducement for a private citizen to pursue the cause of action. This despite the fact it is a Federal Law. I take this as the legislature had no intention for the Federal Government to be held accountable to the law.

I will count this as numerous violations of my law another act of treason as the court once again failed to address the  gaping holes in their logic with any viable show of reason. They should be held accountable for all consequences.

*************************************************************************************************************

Need for reform of the Judiciary – A Study of judges unaccountability and consequent riskless wrongdoing. By  Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq. However, the judges is this matter should not consider their actions risk less.

See OPT In America Letter to the U.S. State Department July 21, 2016

See OPT Ub Reuters Good Ole Boy Network to the Supreme Court. “At Americas Court of Last Resort”  

**************************************************************************************************************

July 25 2016 – Today Hospice informs me my mother will not likely live another 24 hours. The final years of her life,the opportunity to enjoy a grandchild, to spend time living with family, time to enjoy friends, family and life were stolen from her by the Government criminals who failed to do their jobs, the criminals, who created this racket, the criminals who aided and abetted these criminals from responsibility or accountability for their actions. The greatest criminals of all those who act criminally to deny the justice their charged with administering. In my book you will forever be labeled traitors to the constitution, traitors to the American people, traitors to your country and countrymen.

Judges train law clerks to become lawyers, who become attorney generals and legislators making laws and appointing State Judges. More often than not one of these lawyer legislators becomes President and then gets to appoint Federal Judges and Supreme Court Justices who are confirmed primarily by lawyers turned legislators. This is the epitome of a good ole boy crony capitalist net work where one bad apple at the corp spoils the whole bunch. 

The Court of Federal Claims from which the appeal originates does not usually have Jury trials, However, Since Presidents, Congressmen, Senators and the Judiciary have all been involved in the operations of this enterprise; which I contend was an ACT of treason and all branches of Government have culpability; and the Judiciary seems to be interested in protecting it. Numerous request to my congressional representative for a congressional hearing have been ignored. Many of Congress and the Senates career statesmen have been involved in this crime. 

All of the Judges on this appellate court were appointed life appointments to this court by Reagan, Bush, Clinton, or Obama. And numerous Senators on the Congressional and Senate Judiciaries including Vice President Joe Biden and Al Gore were involved in this RICO enterprises establishment and these judges confirmations. 

Only a Jury can provide the appearance of fairness.

Heres a linked list of the judges and their appointee.

The linked document has a great deal of supporting information on allegations made in this filing it furthermore, provides footnote’s with links to supporting documentation from unrelated parties. See more in depth information here: The Irony of Why

Make it known for the record I consider every argument made by the DOJ and Judge Damich to be based on lies not law and the Appeal  and writ of Mandamus filed reflect that. Given Governments role in this criminal operation I will only accept a different answer from a jury given all the evidence and facts. 

Footnote 1- Un Agenda 21, The Civil Rights Act of 1991, was part of the scheme. Piggford I & II, The American Indian, and Hispanic and Women rancher settlements false flag cries of discrimination concealing, Gross Negligence to limit damage awards and the population to less than 2 percent of farmers. 

CBJulian

Not a Pro Pro Se Per Se

Blue Ridge Springs,

Patriot Soldier of Misfortune.

@blueridgespring

Blueridgesprings.wordpress.com

Blueridgesprings.com

Wall of Injustice Street!

Wall of Injustice Street!

 

March 18, 2016 I filed suit against Wall Street in the Federal District Court of North Carolina Western District ,Charlotte NC.Case 3:16-cv-00173 Complaint for poisoning the nations mortgage market, the financial collapse, the regulatory impact-Dodd Frank, and the disappearance of mortgage credit availability that followed. Specifically the extinction of ALT A stated income loans. Please see the most recent updates in this case below 10-1-2016 & 10-7-2016.

The premise of the case is pretty simple. Wall Street, specifically the subprime 25, their financiers, and  rating agencies were negligent and fraudulent when they flooded the mortgage markets with bad loans. The financial collapse that ensued resulted in financial reforms namely Dodd Frank.Dodd Frank legislation which extinguished the mortgage products known as ALT A stated income loans. See New Law Ability to Repay tightens mortgage regulations.

Loans are products, there are many mortgage loan products with differing characteristics ALT A among them. ALT A Stated income loans were an available product in the pre financial collapse market. The Federal reserve bank of St. Louis did a study on ALT A mortgage loans from 1998 – 2007 and the data shows the product had tolerable default rates prior to the subprime bubble between 2004 – 2007. Here is an excerpt from the federal reserve banks conclusions of that analysis or you can read the analysis here. Alt A The Forgotten Segment of The Mortgage Market.

” The summary data indicate a shift of Alt-A originations toward a greater share of owner-occupied properties, adjustable-rate products, and cash-out refinances. This is accompanied by a deterioration of underwriting standards for a greater proportion of mortgages with lower documentation and higher loan-to-value ratios. Serious delinquencies on Alt-A originations rose sharply in 2006 and 2007, primarily for originations after 2003.”

“In their handbook chapter on Alt-A mortgages, Bhattacharya, Berliner, and Liber (2006, p. 189) remark that “the demarcation between Alt-A and subprime loans has been blurred. Over time Alt-A has expanded to include loans with progressively less documentation and lower borrower credit scores. At the same time, subprime loans have, on average experienced a slow but steady rise in average credit scores. A result of this convergence has been the creation of the so-called Alt-B sector”

Product negligence law says “A claim in negligence is based on the assumption that the manufacturer owes a duty of care to all those who can reasonably be expected to make use of its product”

I had a project and business development effort I began in 2007. In 2008 and again in late 2009 I obtained loan commitments on this project. Project delays as well as numerous other variables prompted funding the development efforts without borrowing. Thats putting your own capital and equity at risk on a project. But, it was also a simple conversion of the capital into a capital asset.

In 2012 personal capital began to run out and the need arose to borrow against the real estate holdings to continue the development work. However, financial institutions which had previously been willing to provide funding now stated Dodd Frank Reg B prevented them from mortgaging the property. Paying yourself to work on capital improvements was no longer an acceptable source of income. Dodd Frank Reg B would prevent us from borrowing against assets in which more than a half million had already been invested.

This forced a turn to, the only available source of rural credit, the USDA Farm Service Agency. A government run criminal enterprise which has provided three years and counting of living despotic tyranny and oppressive hell.

Had Wall Street subprime lenders not negligently poisoned the mortgage market, had they not seriously undermined the underwriting standards of the ALT A mortgage market, Dodd Frank would not have occurred, credit markets would not have contracted so significantly, and the little guy in this case with a half million invested in a viable business, and debt free property development, with a blemish free credit history would have been able to obtain funding on a low ratio loan to value farm winery business development effort and paid himself to work like any small business owner.

But For the negligence of Wall Streets subprime lending there would have been no need for Dodd Frank legislation and but for Dodd Frank and the credit crunch this small business would be up and running and not destroyed. How much has the DOJ claimed to have been awarded in damages for the actions of these firms? How much has been provided in restitution to individuals who got locked out of mortgage markets because they had solid credit and assets and no mortgage when these institutions brought the house down?

The journey has been a very long a painful one resulting in significant financial hardship. As of 4/25/16 the Federal court has not approved a request for In Forma Pauperis and the suit against Wall Street sits on the court docket having not been served. Since legal battles started more than 2 years ago request for In Forma Pauperis have been granted in all suits against the USDA, leading one to the conclusion the court is wondering if Wall Street should be held accountable for the negligence which caused a mortgage products extinction and the consequential damages to an individual who could reasonably have been expected to make use of the product.

Update 4-29-2016 As of this evening the court has not approved the In Forma Pauperis status. On three other separate fillings it was approved. What does that mean? Has the court been too busy? Did someone drop the ball? Usually they’ll deny an application if they believe the suit lacks merit however, they have not denied the application either, so are they having a difficult time with the question of merit or a difficult time with the truths about the courts it exposes?  Or do they just plan on being instruments of tranny and despotic oppression? Who is is truly running the US Government? They say if you really want to know who the oppressor is look for the one who can’t tolerate true criticism.

Update 5-6-2016 As of this evening the court has not approved or denied the In Forma Pauperis.

Update 5-13-2016 As of this evening the court has not approved or denied the In Forma Pauperis.Therefore the court has not acted on the Complaint though its been in their possession for a month. This topic is worth a post all its own. Perhaps even a chapter in the book on how Un cvil the courts really are but that will have to wait. In the Federal Rules of civil Procedure  Rule 1 states:

“They should be construed and administered to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding.”

There is nothing just or speedy about a court leaving a proceeding waiting a month on approval for In Forma Pauperis status.

Rule 4 Summons (c) Service 3. By Marshall or someone specifically appointed states:

“The court must so order if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915”

The court can dismiss a case at anytime if it deems the case malicious, frivolous, lacking in merit, or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Three separate courts have already found us eligible to proceed In Forma, one very recently.  The Courts inaction appears based on effecting the judges will from some outside influence rather than making judgement on the facts of the case before them.Holding a case you intend to dismiss is intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Judges as I understand from the rules and Pro Se guides are not supposed to be influenced in their decision making by information outside that presented through proceedings to the court. Would reading this blog be outside the proceedings? While my blog generally gets daily activity I found the activity of April 6, 2016 interesting. Because Judge Robert J.Conrad has 3 magistrate judges. He had on his calendar for May 6, 2016 a scheduled status Conference, and on April 6, 2016 3 individuals heavily investigated the blog in search of information on me and my legal cases. See the blog activity.

Justice delayed is Justice denied.

Update 5-20-2016 By end of this 5th week the court has still not ruled on the motion for in forma pauperis. If the court finds Plaintiffs financially eligible and the complaint meritorious then Plaintiffs have a fundamental right for the case to continue and the court should require issuance and service of process. If the court finds for any reason the complaint is deficient then the court should allow for amendment of the complaint unless its deficiencies cannot be cured.

Justice delayed is Justice denied.

Update 5-28-2016 By end of this 6th week the court has still not ruled on the motion for in forma pauperis blocking process of service. Why would a Federal Court choose to hold motionless a case against Wall Street by a private citizen? Why would the court leave a private citizen tortured by their inaction? How powerless are the American people to hold  Federal Courts accountable? Someone has been looking at various aspects of the RICO case and should be aware of 2 things 1. All known facts have not been disclosed and of significance 2. ” The Law itself is on trial quite as much as the case which is to be decided”

Justice delayed is Justice denied.

Update 6-3-2016 By end of 7 weeks the court has still not ruled on the motion for in forma pauperis blocking process of service. Why? If the court finds Plaintiffs financially eligible and the complaint meritorious then Plaintiffs have a fundamental right for the case to continue and the court should require issuance and service of process. If the court finds for any reason the complaint is deficient then the court should allow for amendment of the complaint unless its deficiencies cannot be cured.

Justice delayed is Justice denied.

Update 6-10-2016 By end of 8 weeks the court has still not ruled on the motion for in forma pauperis blocking process of service.

Update 6-13-2016 If the Court was granting Government notice as a potential defendant 60 days are up!

Justice delayed is Justice denied.

Update 6-18-2016 By the end of 9 weeks the court has still not ruled on the motion for in forma pauperis blocking process of service. As I’ve said many times. If a Federal Court wishes to ignore your civil rights – you have none.

Update 6-26-2016 The court is still stalling the proceedings it appears we have a vexatious refusal of a constitutional right by the government institution responsible for protecting them.

Update 7-04-2016 I saved my week 11 update for today Independence day. Many people believe the war of independence was about independence from Britain however,  justification for the war, its root cause was the Kings denial of Due Process as promised in the Magna Carta. Which is precisely the root cause of all my legal proceedings against the U.S. Government.

“In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.” Declaration of independence Thomas Jefferson.

The denial continues V va la revolution!

Update 7-09-2016 – Denial of Service continues. It’s said of all things Due Process is fundamental fairness. Is this Due Process. The  FRCP requires process of service in 90 day’s which will be up in 6 day’s; The court has never ruled on the motion to proceed in-forma which had it been granted required the court to process service. So if they fail to rule on the motion and then dismiss the case for failure to serve is that Due Process?

Update 7-16-2016 – 91 Day’s on the docket and Senior Judge Rober J. Conrad has yet to affirm or deny the case against Wall Street has Merit. Do you believe he has been unable to make that determination? Will he dismiss the case now with an unanswered motion to proceed informa for failure to effect service? 

Update 7-23-2016 – 98 Day’s no change.

Update 7-23-2016 – 105 Day’s on the Docket Stalled by the Courts inaction. 

Update 8-20-2016 – 126 Day’s on the Docket Stalled by the Courts inaction.

Update 8-22-2016 – From the Clerk of Court-

” Mr. Julian,
upon review of your case it appears that the motion is still pending at this time and is still waiting on a decision from the Judge. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office at 704-350-7400, thank you.”

Update 8-27-2016 – 133 Day’s on the Docket Stalled by the Courts inaction.

Update 9-10-2016 – 141 Day’s on the Docket Stalled by the Courts inaction. Note the Letter to Judge Conrad requesting a ruling to proceed this case was Docketed on 9-7-2016 but no ruling has yet occurred.The letter is on the blog as Letter to Judge Robert J. Conrad August 29, 2016

Update 9-24-2016 5 Months on the Docket and still stalled by the courts inaction. The only case filed in April assigned to Judge Robert J. Conrad which has not progressed in the court system. The letter of August 29, (see above) requested he either allow the case to proceed or dismiss it for lack of merit. He has done neither.  To understand why we believe the court is stalling this case see the blog post Treason & The Good Ole Boy Network; The ABA Within

Update 10-1-2016 5 Months on the Docket and on September 27th 2016 Judge Robert Conrad denied the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Why did it take 5 months to determine this? First on three other separate occasions including February and March of 2016 the Federal Courts granted plaintiffs in forma pauperis status. The court is well aware of the Plaintiffs debt stresses lack of employment, obstructions to employment and reliance on government assistance but denies the request. Plaintiffs can see no other justification for such action by this judge than a blatant attempt at obstruction of justice by the court. The Motion to this court  filed 4/15/2016 was almost if not identical to the one granted by the Court of Appeals for the Federal district on 4/13/2016. 

Update 10-7-2016 – After filing a motion on 10-6-2017 for reconsideration of the Courts denial of In Forma Pauperis status, Plaintiffs paid the Court cost and filed summons for issue with the Clerk of Court. Summons issued. Plaintiffs are in process of having these summons served.If this case has issues with merit, is deficient, or fails to state a claim, as the Federal Government has consistently pled and been granted. Then this Court has failed to abide by FRCP1 as the expended cost in this case just skyrocketed!   

Update 4-10-2017-

Boni Judicis Est Ampliare Jurisdictionem

Update 6-29-2017 14 Months on the Docket and the only conclusion a Plaintiff can draw is justice delayed is justice denied. The Federal Courts aiding Government tyranny. 

CBJulian

Not a Pro Pro Se Per Se

Blue Ridge Springs,

Patriot Soldier of Misfortune.

@blueridgespring

Blueridgesprings.wordpress.com

Blueridgesprings.com

Mandamus Usurped Justice Usurped Impartial Hearing Denied.

Mandamus Usurped Justice Usurped Impartial Hearing Denied.

If you were to read the Writ of Mandamus Writ of Mandamus filed with the Court of Appeals for the Federal District. It should make pretty clear as plaintiffs we felt we were denied a fair and unbiased hearing by judge Edward J. Damich Because.

  • He declined to attest, he had taken the Oath of office.
  • He declined to attest, he would abide by that oath.
  • He declined to attest, he would abide by his judicial cannons.
  • He was appointed to the bench by President William Jefferson Clinton whom the complaint alleges established a racketeering enterprise in violation of federal law and the constitution.
  • Because Judge Damich refused to attest to his oath, and an intention to abide by it he has by default provided the impression he cannot be trusted to abide by his oath his cannons, or faithfully apply the law.
  • He was requested to recuse himself for the reasons stated and he declined to do so.
  • He did not disclose all the reasons nor address them with any appropriate rationale.

If a judge declines to attest, he will preform his duties in accordance with his oaths of office and according to the cannons of that office don’t you think his “impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” See 28 U.S.C. 455(a).

The Appellate court was requested to remove Judge Damich, vacate, his judgement and provide a judge to hear the case willing to attest and abide by their oath’s to the law and the constitution. This is the constitutional promise of Due Process, of a fair and unbiased hearing. After all your simply asking the Judge to affirm he will do the job he is paid to do as he has sworn to do.

The Federal Court of Appeals converted the Writ of mandamus and directed the clerk to log the request as a request for an appeal. See The Court Order

Plaintiffs made clear in the Writ this could not remedy the lack of a fair and unbiased hearing. It’s a denial of Due Process and the right to a fair and unbiased hearing as any appellate review is subject to the same dishonor by judges who have not committed to abide by their oaths or the fair and proper administration of the law. Take a look at who appointed the judges to this court.

By converting the Writ to an appeal the court breached the same law as Judge Damich. They have provided reason to question their impartiality, honor and integrity.

A fair and impartial hearing by a judge committed to the administration of the law, according to the constitution, is no longer provided by the U.S. Federal Court System.  Justice is not being served!

Any judge who refuses to attest to his oath of office, to abide by that oath, and to abide by the cannons of his office is unfit to preform the duties he is paid to do. Failure of the courts to provide hearings by honorable judges is a denial of the Governments constitutional obligation and indication they intend to effect their will and not the just administration of the law.

What do you think?

Since the Court converted a writ to an appeal. They obviously have arguments written for a writ and not an appeal and the court reveled with the statements of fact their intent for prevarication and obfuscation.

The Court stated  “The Julians filed suit” … .inter alia, their due process rights were violated by the district court and the court of appeals”  The courts motives are clear; obviously to deny a fair and unbiased hearing, leave Plaintiffs with a slim chance option of an expensive supreme court writ, protect a criminally corrupted Government from accountability and responsibility for failing to meet the obligations promised in federal law 18 U.S.C §1964(c)

Any person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962 of this chapter may sue therefor in any appropriate United States district court and shall recover threefold the damages he sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney’s fee”

Taking of the proceeds of this promise by forcing the completion of Form SF-95 agreeing to accept a sum certain rather than the promised treble damages, Attorneys fees and cost.

The original complaint listed only 2 counts one For Breach of Contract  A second for a taking without just compensation. There was no count listed in the complaint for violation of Due process or Civil rights. They were mentioned in the filing as a cause of the breach but every breach of contract has an illegal cause. The court was never asked to judge the court on the cause or review the prior courts actions regarding the cause only whether the terms of the written agreement were breached. Is it not illegal to breach a contract? Is Due Process a requirement that Government operate legally and within the law? How can a government breach of contract not be a violation of Due process?

? I believe this Country should take the courts  action as a statement by the Federal Courts, the promises of the constitution to the people can no longer be expected from the Judicial branch of the U.S Government. Treason within is currently corrupting this nation with a terminal cancer and the tumor is the ABA.

It should be noted Plaintiffs in this case believe Judge Edward J. Damich was an architect for acts of treason by Bill Clinton and Al Gore and the Chief judge of this appellate court was working right there with the Senate Judiciary as these criminal acts became law.

I don’t believe the federal courts take my laws seriously and that means they’re willing to put a great many people in jeopardy for their mis deeds. If I were a member of the pool I would be greatly concerned about how callously  the court handles my potential future. For explanation see Anatomy of a Criminal Threat Absent Malice

In my latest filing, I have drawn a judge who appears to be of a different corp. We shall see, if he has the honor to walk with me. See the blog on Wall of Injustice Street. Update 6-18-2016 Apparently Not. Update 6-26-2016 The court is still stalling the proceedings it appears we have a vexatious refusal of a constitutional right by the government institution responsible for protecting them.

Update – 5-14-2016 – I mailed the  Appellate Brief on May 11, 2016 next day delivery. USPS shows it was delivered @11 AM on May 12,2016. As of May 14, 2016, it has not been docketed? Basically, My expectation going in on the appeal was it had  a zero chance of success based on prior experience and solid evidence of the Federal Courts intent to protect the Governments criminal operations.This whole criminal enterprise exposes a significant number of powerful figures for having been involved in its establishment. So in writing this appeal I tried to make my appellate points but ,was much more interested in  shedding light on the truth of the courts deception and cronyism than succeeding in the appeal. Because I fully expect the court to railroad this appeal effecting their WILL  and not Judgement on merit. You can pretty well sum up the essence of the appeal by saying the Court lied effecting its WILL, not Judgement on the merit, or based on the law, to protect criminals in all branches of the US Government.  For the Publics purview access to a copy of the appeal filed is available here. Appeal The DOJ’s Response Here, Reply to Response here.

Update 6-26-2016 The Court issued notice of a Hearing which can be viewed Here: Notice of Hearing

A brief review of what the court should address. The Docket in the case on appeal had several procedural irregularities occur which prompted a request for the Judge who was appointed to the bench by the President  accused in the case filing of establishing a criminal enterprise. Judge Edward J. Damich refused to attest to his oath or intent to abide by his oath. It turns out not only did Judge Damich have the means, opportunity, and motive of a judicial appointment, but his career record makes him the perfect presumptive individual to have designed and implemented  USDA’s RICO enterprise for former President William Jefferson Clinton the very criminal enterprise complained of, and the catalyst of litigation. Yet Judge Damich declined to recuse himself from the case. His ruling to  dismiss the case under rule 12b 6 provided no explanation for accepting as true the DOJ’s every faulty premised argument.

The bar for a 12b 6 dismissal is supposed to be very high?

The bar for recusal is supposedly the appearance a judges: ” impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”

It should be noted for the publics concern the court has repeatedly stated it does not review the decisions of district courts. This appears to leave America with a gapping whole of accountability. This was a function of congress however, Congress delegated that responsibility to the court of federal claims as agent of congress and the courts declining they preform that function?

CBJulian

Not a Pro Pro Se Per Se

Blue Ridge Springs,

Patriot Soldier of Misfortune.

@blueridgespring

Blueridgesprings.wordpress.com

Blueridgesprings.com

Morgan Griffith

Morgan Griffith

April 9, 2016

Congressmen Morgan Griffith,

 RE: The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants

Two months and I see no evidence you’re doing your job. Lives are on the line! You better be doing your job representing my family, the farmers, and people of this country. Congressmen and Senators are guilty of treason on the constitution and the people. This Government started a war against my family. The rules are written but not followed. But with my rules every breach is an act of violence against me, and my family and every act of violence against us shall receive and equal and opposite reaction.

You are responsible and accountable. I will not tolerate my family being victims of government tyranny and oppression. I will not tolerate a government warring against the people and the peoples constitution. I followed the laws of this nation. Government repeatedly has not! Those who wage war are soldiers of war which side are you on Congressman?

CBJulian

Not a Pro Pro Se Per Se

Blue Ridge Springs,

Patriot Soldier of Misfortune.

@blueridgespring

Blueridgesprings.wordpress.com

Blueridgesprings.com

Mr. President You Are an Imposter!

Mr. President You Are an Imposter!

This is not about partisan politics, Its about Life, Liberty, and Justice for All.

The Constitution of the United States of America is the supreme law of the land. No other law, rule, regulation or code including contract can supersede it, nor can authority as President nor an imposter acting as a President. Barack Hussein Obama has not preformed his duties to his oath of office under Article 2 Clause 3. Consequently, he’s calculated an obstruction of justice and so,  contempt for the law, a broken oath, a breach of contract, an act of treason. Barack Hussein Obama is an imposter, unlawful in the office, and in violation of 18 U.S.C §912 and of treason. He was asked to address these issues on April 14, 2015. You may refer to Mr. President all thats necessary for the triumph of Government evil is for those in power to do nothing! 

Numerous representatives of Congress, the Senate, the Vice President, former President Bill Clinton and Vice President Al Gore, all had a hand in a heinous act of war against Americas Farmers!  Do we really want a government that wars against the people its paid to serve?

In review of history its repeated countless times they wage this war to protect the tax payers coffers. TRUTH – This war is  waged with extraordinary operating cost because management is incompetent and has been grossly negligent. They seek only to avoid accountability and responsibility for failing to do the jobs they were paid and failed to do. They’re sweeping their incompetence under a rug at the expense of the Constitution, Tax Payers, and war by Government on the people its elected to serve. TREASON!

Below  a Letter mailed USPS express mail to the President of the United States on April 5, 2016 and below that  you’ll find a letter to my congressional representative sent March 21, 2016. I have tried numerous times over the last few years to get a Congressional hearing or Grand Jury on this matter. However, ranking members of Congress and the Senate participated in the implementation of this treason on the people. I have yet to ever hear from my Congressmen on this demand. There is no fair tribunal in America anymore. A Government corrupt in all its branches prevents  people from ever  having an unbiased fair hearing or a Government that represents its people.

For my money they should all walk the plank without pay. They should all be impeached. The devastation they’ve bestowed on others is simply pure despotic Evil!

V said Violence can be done for Good! Perhaps its time We The People should get violent!

 

                                                                         Blue Ridge Springs OrchardBRS_Image                                                                                        Blueridgesprings.com

President of the United States
Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW                                                                       April 5, 2016
Washington DC 20500

 

Re: Racketeering by the President Legal Notice for Equitable Tolling.

Case History:

January 2007 Government began secret war against the Julians.

September 2013 4:13-cv-00054 JLK Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization RICO filed against USDA.

June and September 2014 14-1480 14-1925 4th Circuit court of Appeals Grants USDA RICO a wink and a nod.

February 2015 14-1051 Writ of Certiorari to Supreme Court on RICO filed.

April 14, 2015 Julian letter to President Barrack Obama requesting he perform his sworn duty Article 2 Clause 3 to take care of this Nation.

April 22, 2015 Decision of SCOTUS in US v. Kwai Fun Wong FTCA is subject to equitable tolling.

April 27, 2015 Writ of Certiorari denied. Puppets give Government wink and nod.

November 9, 2015 1:15-cv-01344 EJD Suit against U.S for Breach of Contract & Taking without Just compensation Failure of Court to Follow Law.

March 18, 2016 16-122 Writ of Mandamus Federal Circuit. Federal Judge Edward J. Damich Suspect architect of the RICO, appointed to the bench by its implementer William Jefferson Clinton declines to attest to his oath of office or intent to abide it. Was that a fair and unbiased tribunal?

 

Dear Mr. President,

Mr. President your actions demonstrate a lack of commitment, to the oath of office for President of these United States. An astonishing display of hypocrisy from someone claiming to be a constitutional scholar, regularly standing on the world stage proclaiming this nations commitment to the rule of law, while your cabinet wages blatant criminal and unconstitutional war on members of its society, a war the current administration seems intent to expand with total disregard and respect of the supreme law.

This is notice, in every proclaimed court of justice, Plaintiffs filings have met with criminal corruption each spawning grounds for yet further legal proceedings against those who criminally act to protect exposure of the “ENTIRE” Governments trespass on the Constitution and violations of Federal Law. A crime supported by the President, implemented with treason in Congress and Senate, aided, abetted, and protected by the Judiciary. Constitutional law and all law extending from it seems to have lost all meaning where government is the criminal. Perhaps Governments power to control the bench is just too great when man no longer respects truth and honor?

“No legacy is so rich as honesty” William Shakespeare

This is notice of Plaintiff’s intent to expect equitable tolling of the statute of limitations on the racketeering charges and all other tort claims outstanding, even in light of the judiciaries overt criminal intents to protect these heinous crimes. These cases will be prosecuted again after each and every violation of civil rights and crime committed protecting the Governments racketeering enterprise against its people has been heard by an unbiased tribunal. The Judiciary is expected to uphold the precedent set in United States v. Wong.

Only then can the extent of the RICO’s participants, guardians, and traitors be completely identified and properly addressed.

When the Federal judiciary aids and abets corruption by the people’s representatives across all branches of government. Traitors from within have seized the Nation! Lessons of more than a thousand years teach us

“ A nation cannot survive treason from within! ” Cicero 42 B.C.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”

Declaration of independence Thomas Jefferson

The USDA’s Criminal Enterprise, established with the Agricultural reorganization act of 1994 is designed to deny We The People the rights demanded by the Constitution of the United States. This criminal enterprise wars against the Constitution and We The People. Acts of treason as so stated in Article III Section 3 of the Constitution. The Government has seriously breached its agency duty in pursuit of interest to its own liking. Tens of thousands of farmers, some well known like Piggford, some few have ever heard of like Paxton, all have suffered great pain and injustice at the hands of a Government turned tyrant.

Only those who perpetrated this grand con can tell us the true history of its design, although numerous historical facts provide compelling evidence it was designed to hide the truth of Governments criminal gross negligent mismanagement. A fact both political factions wished to distance their culpability from with their usual superciliousness. Yes they choose to sweep the grand mess for which they were responsible and accountable under the rug becoming prevaricators binding all those who Succeed precede them into the same criminal role. The cost of which is incomprehensible to all those who’s lives, livelihoods, life, liberty, freedom, and even property suffered all manner of despotic destruction. This criminal enterprise must be terminated at all cost!

My personal journey demands I pursue truth and justice in this matter and the honor I desire for myself requires the disinfecting light of truth. This injustice should not be maintained. As Clarence Thomas told these same transgressors “Enough is Enough”!

While my personal knowledge and study of Government transgressions of the constitution are limited to the study of this massacre.

I will submit to your recollection, whether liberty has been destroyed most often by the licentiousness of the people, or by the tyranny of rulers. I imagine, sir, you will find the balance on the side of tyranny.” Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers.

The Constitution of the United States was written on thousands of years of precedent, knowledge, and forethought with the belief

Representative government and trial by jury are the heart and lungs of liberty” John Adams

However; a Government of representatives who implement a racket with specific intent to abolish the liberties and law defined by the supreme law are traitors.

The U.S Judicial system is terminally ill with a cancer of corruption, a product of incestuous gifted power from corrupted politicians and judicial passions for party, power, and privileges of their corp. The Jurist of this nation have protected themselves with a cloak of darkness, a shield of absolute immunity gifted upon themselves which lies nowhere in the constitution of these United States.

With elimination of civilian rights to a grand jury, and a judicial system, which disposes of the Jury trial, Government and the judicial system have abolished the people’s abilities to hold Government representatives and the Judiciary accountable to the law. With a Government of treasonous representatives protecting a treasonous group of jurist who reciprocate a nation of, for and by the people has become a Government of, for, and by despotic tyranny of the people in business for its own enrichment.

Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance.” Albert Einstein

Plaintiffs have diligently investigated for truth, and the incentives of RICO and will forever proclaim to the world; implementation and operation of this RICO enterprise established by the Agricultural Reorganization Act of 1994 was unconstitutional wars against the people and is factually and act of treason far more despicable and deserving of exile than anything Edward Snowden ever imagined. There is simply no reasonable justification for such evils continuance thereof, or the multi billion dollar cover-ups. It took a lot of traitors to pass this legislation, a lot more participating to keep hiding it. What extraordinary hypocrites delusional in their grandeur our nations government harbors. The evil men do lives after them. This evil licentiousness of elected representatives should live in infamy. I will personally do everything humanly possible to see that history tells the truth of this. Mankind is destined to continue its cruel and destructive ways when it fails to accept truth and learn from its mistakes. The Supreme law was written to avoid just such injustices on its people. Only idiots with excessive haughtiness would massacre it to protect and indulge their hubris.

Government needs a basis to exercise authority over people. Citizens must accept government authority.  A government-lacking acceptance of the people over whom it exercises authority will not endure.

When “Government becomes a lawbreaker it breeds contempt for the law; it invites every man to come a law unto himself. It invites anarchy.” United States v. Olmstead, 277 U.S. 438 (1928). Louis Brandies.

The Peoples representatives have invited a return to anarchy by treason against the constitution; history should hold these representatives responsible and accountable for murdering the constitution of the United States. No man should succumb to the authority of government bent on despotic tyranny.

Only when Government willingly atones to its transgressions and resolves to abolish such despotic acts of tyranny and oppression and is again made to abide by the rule of law can anyone’s rights to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness be protected. Only then can we again be home of the free.

“The world will not be destroyed by those that do evil but by those who watch and do nothing “ Albert Einstein.

On reflection of Albert Einstein’s statement and my letter of April 14, 2015 one can ascertain there are three kinds of people; those who do evil, those who do good, and those who are stupid. Which are you? The evil men do lives after them.

History has shown a Nation cannot survive treason within. The day when the evil becomes insufferable is fast approaching and with the dawns light a new American Revolution will be born. It’s no longer a matter of if, but when the next revolution will begin thanks to treason with in.

God help this nation for revolution to take hold. The Cancer of Corruption is so wide spread it’s likely terminal.

 

Christopher. B. Julian

 

The Julian Family

474 Orchard View Drive

Ararat, Virginia 24053

Christopher.b.julian@gmail.com

 

CC: Secretary of Agriculture

1400 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Mail Stop 0101 Room 200-A

Washington, DC 20250

Assistant Secretary Agriculture Admin.

1400 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Mail Stop 0103 Room 240-W

Washington, DC 20250

Dept of Agriculture White House Liaison

1400 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Mail Stop 0112 Room 507-A

Washington, DC 20250

 

Congressman Morgan Griffith                                                              March 21, 2016

9th District of Virginia

I have not heard from your office nor seen any indication you’re performing your 
representative duties as my congressional representative.

Congresses agency representative, Superior Judge Edward J. Damich so called the conscience of the nation choose treason over justice.

I have preformed my civic 
duty to so charge however, his jurist is the Federal District Appellate Court in the same building with him, Chief of whom is Judge Sharon Prost.

The rule of law requires; the law be written and the punishment defined before a controversy exists and so it was and is. I know you’ve read it!

So too the law of treason is written! 
Laws against its accomplice as well,18 U.S.C. 2382 Misprision of treason!

Consider it carefully as President Barrack Obama; Vice President Joe Biden, former Vice President Al Gore, Judge Edward J. Damich, and Chief of the Federal appellate court Judge Sharon Prost of the United States were all present at the undermining of the Constitution of these United States by former President William Jefferson Clinton. Present In the design and implementation of the criminal unconstitutional racketeering enterprise the President operates from executive offices!

Perception is 9 tenths of reality and, the perception is, Andrew Breitbart, Anton Scalia, and others may well have paid a heavy price for their knowledge.

Title 18 U.S.C 242 Makes it illegal to deny an individuals constitutional rights under color of authority and treason is a known criminal offense.

Title 28 U.S.C 455(a) by federal law prevents any other Judge from ruling over a charge of a criminal act by Judge Edward J. Damich.

However, The only way to make a judge answer for criminal behavior is to bring criminal charges against him. The ultimate irony here is that the only way to bring criminal charges against a bad judge is to ask another judge for permission to pursue the bad judge.

A private citizen cannot bring criminal charges anymore the judiciary has done away with the private call for a Grand Jury, and thus we have a catch 22 of due process, a veritable fortress protecting treason from within.

However, treason under Article III Section 3 of the United States of America’s Constitution States: “The Congress shall have Power to declare the punishment of Treason” 

Therefore, I demand as a represented member of We The People, the true sovereign of this nation, Congress perform its sworn duty in this matter!

A Congressional hearing of We The people is long over due!

“When” Government becomes a lawbreaker it breads contempt for the law; it invites every man to come law unto himself. It invites anarchy.” Justice Louis Brandeis States v. Olmstead, 277 U.S. 438 (1928).

The Constitution of these United States of America is the supreme law of the land. No other law, rule, regulation or code including contract can supersede it, nor can authority as a judge, or an imposter acting as a judge. Judge Edward J. Damich declined to confirm his oath and consequently, he calculated an obstruction of justice and so, a contempt of court, a broken oath, a breach of contract and an act of treason. Judge Edward J. Damich is an imposter, unlawful in the office, and in violation of 18 U.S.C §912.

This matter is now squarely according to the Constitution of the These United States the Jurisdiction of Congress! Article III Section 3.

Government cannot and will not remain unaccountable and irresponsible in its constitutional obligations to the sovereign will of the people. Those who war against the constitution war against We The People and are defined by the supreme law of the land as traitors.

This story is being well documented and when anarchy begins the media will have no choice but to report it. However, your job Morgan Griffith, as my congressional representative is to ensure congress hears these charges of treason and act on them, you need to take responsibility and accountability for your job!

Me I’m going to lay back and enjoy some summer BBQ’s and watch to ensure your doing your job. While I make it my civic duty to make America aware of the treason within! See Anatomy of a Criminal Threat Absent Malice

CBJulian

Not a Pro Pro Se Per Se

Blue Ridge Springs,

Patriot Soldier of Misfortune.

@blueridgespring

Blueridgesprings.wordpress.com

Blueridgesprings.com

In The War On You And Me.

In The War On You And Me.

For more than a decade now the U.S. Government has waged war on my family, American Citizens, a secret war started in 1994 with a legislative act of treason by Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Joe Biden, and Patrick Leahy. My family is by no means the first casualty of this war, and will not be the last unless the People stand up and demand it.

It was an ACT of Treason because:

  1. With the establishment of the National Appeals Division (NAD) It put Executive, Legislative, and Judicial power in the hands of the Secretary of Agriculture reporting directly to the President and altered the Administrative procedures Act for its criminal purpose.
  2. It abolished the Federal Rules of Evidence in USDA Administrative appeals and eliminated precedent. Two keys of fair procedure built from the lessons of more than two thousand years.
    1. The elimination of precedent denies appellants equal treatment under appeal, under the law.
  3. It set up a racketeering enterprise to deny appellants their constitutional rights to due process and equal justice under the law.
    1. Conspiracy to deny constitutional rights is a felony crime under 42 U.S.C 1983.
    2. Racketeering to avoid Financial loss is designing a racket for financial gain as is the goal of taking personal property.
    3. Racketeering that affects agriculture impacts local, state, national and even international commerce.
    4. Policies and procedures to avoid allegations of negligence, fraud, and discrimination mask commission of racketeering predicate acts like obstruction of justice, denying due process, fair hearings, and equal treatment under the law.
    5. Every effort is made procedurally in this conspiracy to obstruct justice for the protection of Government negligence, fraud, conspiracies to defraud, discrimination, basically any crimes committed by USDA personnel in the performance of their jobs.
    6. The objective of this operation is four fold.
      1. Avoid Financial liabilities for crimes.(Primarily the criminal negligence of agency management.)
      2. Avoid accountability abusing sovereign immunity to protect agency personnel from being held responsible for criminal violations or failing to perform statutorily required procedures.
      3. The Process is designed to separate crimes from the financial damages they cause thereby allowing the agency to claim no harm no foul damages on  criminal acts. see related items 4 & 5 below.
      4. Operation of a racketeering enterprise which grants the Agency Slide1the ability to selectively discriminate against farmers for the furtherance primarily of UN Agenda 21 goals, conservation, EPA, BLM , objectives. Its effectively used to reduce farm land and farmers, protect water resources, wet lands, and forest resources, and effect the taking of farm land without just compensation from farmers.  Government is  acting in its own self interest waging financial war on farmers where it wishes to force bankruptcy onto farmers so they can  take the land without compensation and  avoid  a violation of the fifth amendment takings clause.
  4. It sets up generally every appeal as a matter of regulatory interpretation.
  5. By design the Agency is rigging and scamming to write laws to fit their objective with each farmer by claiming  a right to deference of interpretation of the regulations they put into law. Should an appellant challenge that in Federal Court the courts are prepared to abuse Auer, Seminole rock, and Chevron deference to oblige the agency. All of which has been recognized as unconstitutional by numerous members of the Supreme Court and until recently the most outspoken of jurist Anton Scalia.
  6. In my case while we demanded a jury decide the jury demand was unconstitutionally circumvented and the court granted deference to rewrite the law, contrary to Supreme court guidance, contrary even to the plain language of the statute.
  7. Racketeering for these objectives in not Risk Management it’s a Criminal racketeering enterprise by design affecting inter, intra and international commerce for financial gain.
  8. It’s an enterprise blatantly violating numerous Federal, State, and even Supreme laws.

Due process requires Government operate legally and within the law. Even the President SCOTUS! You cannot be sworn to uphold it and to protect it and gifted to violate it. The promise of Due Process is that Government will abide by the laws it dictates to its citizens.

This is an  effort to usurp the constitutions separation of powers augmented by a criminal enterprise designed to deprive individuals of their constitutional rights to due process , equal justice, and taking of property without just compensation. Its a process allowing the agency to write their own laws at will to deny farmers their legal rights. I call that levying war against the constitution and against farmers. Farmers are “Them” We The People This is a plain act of treason by our elected representative’s and the Federal Court judges who’ve with congressional blessings have literally violated their oaths of office, violated federal laws protecting constitutional rights, violated the Constitutions requirement of the people that Government operate legally within the law which includes the Constitution. They’ve knowingly conspired to established a war against the Constitution.  A war against the American people a war on fundamental legal foundation on which the country was founded.

Call yourself a patriot? Well this your screaming at the Government to adhere to the law, to adhere to the principles of the Constitution, to abide by your demands. Your no patriot your a traitor.

This act of treason is a war on you and me. This treason was born from many objectives within both political parties. So much so, only a single senate vote by a decorated soldier of Vietnam is recorded cast in opposition. Each and every yes vote cast abolished provisions of the constitution protecting  The People from tyranny and oppression. Each and every vote was a vote to strip American Citizens of their rights to due process, equal justice, fair hearings before unbiased tribunals, and equal justice under the law.This was an ACT to empower a deceitful, despotic, criminal unconstitutional tyrant. This was an act of war on We The People and the Constitution of the United States of America. This was an ACT making the President King.

In passing this legislation with Bi Parisian support, Congress and the Senate agreed to allow the U.S. Government to war against We The People and abolished the people’s Constitutional protections. Indeed, Congress and the Senate allowed Government long established to be changed for light and transient causes most notably managements incompetence.  Take note each and every Senator voting yes on this legislation is guilty of Treason there were 98 yes 1 vote of no and 1 who did not cast a vote from a Senator who switched parties that year. Each and every congressional vote of yes was an act of treason but interestingly there’s no record of the Congressional votes. Who sets the punishment for treason?

Today Congress is unwilling to admit their transgressions or to stop the war. Yet they have on numerous occasions swept truth under the rug with 4.4 billion in payouts to date. Interestingly most of which went to lawyers. This war is run from the office of the Secretary of Agriculture a cabinet member of the President of the United States, a President who is working hard to expand this war and its weapons. Will you be its next casualty? It has already taken life, liberty, and property from tens of thousands and reaped destruction on tens of thousands more. May the next Supreme Court Justice be a true servant of the people, another originalist to protect the sanctity of the constitution.

Nominations and appointments build the Federal Judiciary from the legislature and President. These judges have ties through party and corps to those who grant them gifted seats of long-term power. Knowingly or not, all of the Judiciary has assisted with the usurpation of its power to aid this war for decades. Today the Judiciary ignores the constitution, federal law, and civil rights, which command it to address these crimes. They too have committed the Federal Judiciary to Treason against the Constitution and We The People. The very judges now presiding over cases I brought against this racket were at the table for its design. They were given powerful seats in return for willingness to transgress the law and the supreme law. This is another area America has serious problems that need addressing.Lawyers are a major corp of the treason with in.

I have tried now for years as a victim of this heinous crime to stop it through proper channels with:

Mediation, biased by design with the act of Treason

Hearings, biased by design in the act of Treason

Lawsuit in an Article 3 Federal Court, Jury trial demanded and denied.

A Request to the President under Article 2 clause 3 to uphold the law and Constitution, NO reply.

Lawsuit in an Article 1 Court of Federal Claims.” Conscience of the Nation” Where a Judge with significant ties to treasonous legislation refused to honor his oath of office.

A direct petition to Congressional representative for redress before Congress. No response!

A Writ of Mandamus to the Court of Appeals in the Federal District, Chief of whom was appointed by a traitor and who sat at the table as traitors plotted this  treasonous legislation.

“In every stage of Oppressions (I) We have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury.” Declaration of Independence Thomas Jefferson.

Every repeated injury an act of despicable dishonorable rape, robbery, and  assault, all acts of vicious violence committed against me, my family, my friends, my countrymen by a roque Government tyrant. Remember Clarence the humane of it all.

With each crucifixion Government believes it wins. However, they fail to realize they have already lost. History will write truth it cannot be changed. What follows is merely an exorcist of demons lifting the shroud before the bones are interred. With honor I shall perish, the truth be known, and  traitors shall for all time be traitors. The evil men do lives forever after them.Let this evil be known.

Yes America as I challenge these criminal acts of treason in the highest courts in the land the cases are presided over by judges appointed to the bench by these very traitors, even judges  who assisted in designing this very legislative act of war on We The People. Call me a Liar Sue me for Liable the best defense is truth.  I will apologize to know one and accept only the views of an honest unbiased jury trial bestowed with  all relevant evidence. I have many goals but only one mission the end of oppression “Enough is Enough”

When I started this quest I did so having discovered the treason and learning of its prior victims. I believed in the power of the law and the constitution, unaware all branches of the peoples Government had become enemies of the people joining in this treason on the Constitution and the Sovereign people.

For these acts of Treason what punishment shall Congress bestow upon itself?

Each Vote for this legislation was an act of treason,an act of war, each vote that of a traitor. Those who sought this legislation are known and are Traitors. Every traitor of the Constitution of the United States is an enemy of Freedom an enemy of We The People, an enemy of mine. Every individual who protects a traitor or enforces his acts of treason on the people is an enemy of the people. As traitors you have committed acts of war on the people of this nation, you have become soldiers of oppression and as soldiers you are  subject to becoming casualties of the war on you and me. View the list of traitors here.S. 1970 (103rd): Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994

Through all of this, I have blogged the experience, twitted, posted to Facebook, Google, Tumblr, instagram, created petitions, seeking help of my fellow citizens, Help from any media light, all to no avail. Only when We The People demand Government follow our laws will they. History has repeatedly shown Governments left to their own will become tyrannous oppressive despots. Sleeping or awake you are a victim of this war; you are the power of this war. Only a fool powers the destruction of his own rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and only tyrants seek to dispose of them.

“all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.” Thomas Jeferson Declaration of Independence.

The Founding fathers segregated Government power by design, knowing what history had thought them. Today that segregation has been usurped the Government has become but one single oppressive despotic entity warring against the people its supposed to serve for its own self-interest. We The People must demand Government abide by our law that our freedom remains.

I had the great misfortune to unwittingly become both a causality and a solider in a war perpetrated by traitors against me, my family, my friends, and my countrymen, by a Government, created to protect the life liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness of the same. Government for, of, and by the people, has made itself  a “TRAITOR” and mine enemy.

While I have fought this battle alone, I fight for We. I cannot win a war against a completely corrupted and evil Government in all its branches without the help of a Nation and the shine of medias light. Turn on the light! Where is the light? Although, I will do what I can until my soul is free. They care not for the lives of anyone, only for their transient power and passions. How many Senators, Congressmen, Judges, Government employees would like this information to remain hidden from the public? I can tell you all major media is refusing to disclose this truth. Without light and without the commitment of WE stopping the oppression will be quixotic.

At the very least history must reflect the truth of this treason the criminal unconstitutional acts of violence on the American Farmer called the Agricultural Reorganization act of 1994. While I battle with civility, that civility, all to soon must end, and take more of me than anyone should ever be asked to suffer. I have, and do declare my Independence. Government has chosen to nullify the peoples social contract. They now must kill me or fear me or atone for their sin.

Einstein  told us there are three kinds of people Good, Evil, and Stupid. Which one are you?

My deepest sympathies to all those who have suffered the terrorism, abuse and oppression of this  Government, which has stolen the peoples, power for evil. Piggford, Garcia, Love, and especially Paxton to name a few. At some point for all the sooner, the better, the evil will become insufferable and the inevitable revolution will ensue. It should be obvious why terrorist target US this Government is likely at war with them for its own interest as well and not the will of the people.

This Government Constitution has failed at the hands of treason from with in. At the hands of traitors seeking  to conform the world to their desired views for its future. At the hands of fools with egos to grand to atone for their mistakes.The people’s representation as traitors allowed the mutilation of the constitution. Grand superciliousness by the peoples representation to undermine the Constitution of the United States. The U.S. Constitution was a noble effort and the lesson of its failure, people must stay vigilante to protect their rights from those who would rule the world if we let them. Such power in the hands of a cabal can only bring oppression making  us all servants in a war on you and me.

The reality of these treasonous acts leaves me with affiliation to but one party, the party of Patriots. A party for truth, honor, justice for all, A party of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all. I call for creation of a new party politic, a militia of patriot soldiers must unite in a quest to regain freedom from traitors and tyrants.

The next American Revolution is coming and farmers have every right even an obligation to target the list of traitors who saw fit to dismantle a constitution built on a thousand years of lesson.

Friends, Americans, Countrymen lend me your ears.

CBJulian

Not a Pro Pro Se Per Se

Blue Ridge Springs,

Patriot Soldier of Misfortune.

@blueridgespring

Blueridgesprings.wordpress.com

Blueridgesprings.com