America Falls Like Rome!

America Falls Like Rome!

Between 1938 – 1945 Major attacks were made on the pillars of the Constitution of the United States. The majority of these came from a Federalist lead Supreme Court which also failed to block the Executive and Legislative branches from violating the constitutional doctrine of Separation of Powers. It’s not hard to speculate that in this time period of American History racism and bigotry were major contributing factors.

The Doctrine Separation of Powers and its precepts were based on careful analysis of how to keep a government from failing as had happened for thousands of years.

Between 1953 and 1961 Richard M. Nixon was Vice President of the United States. Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan, George H.W.Bush loaded the Supreme Court with Federalist Judges.

In 1965 Taylor Caldwell wrote the Novel A Pillar of Iron. Ironically the events and individuals above with help from Vice President AL Gore, Senator Patrick Leahy, and others lead to the Goss Conspiracy. The linchpin Brutus of treason former Vice President Joe Biden who altered the judicial oath of office in 1990 to allow judges power of discrimination and to ignore constitutional due process rights.

The implementation of the Goss Conspiracy lead to the toppling the US Constitution. The Conspiracy turned the US Government into a criminal enterprise operating in the interest of Oligarchs.

The effects of the Goss Conspiracy on the Constitution was well described by Ted Kennedy’s speech on the Senate Floor when he attacked the nomination Robert Bork‘s Supreme Court nomination. Bork had been Richard Nixon’s Solicitor General and instrumental in the Saturday Night Massacre. It should be noted that Bork abandoned his lifetime Judicial Appointment in 1988.

“Robert Bork’s America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids, and schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists could be censored at the whim of the Government, and the doors of the Federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens.” Senator Ted Kennedy

The New York Times Kennedy and Bork July 5, 1987

Their actions and efforts are in fact perfectly described by Taylor Caldwell’s depiction of Cicero in defending his actions in the Catiline Conspiracy.

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not traitor, he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims and he wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared”

Montesquieu father of the Separation of Powers Doctrine expounded the the following view of Roman History.

“It is not chance that rules the world. Ask the Romans, who had a continuous sequence of successes when they were guided by a certain plan, and an uninterrupted sequence of reverses when they followed another. There are general causes, moral and physical, which act in every monarchy, elevating it, maintaining it, or hurling it to the ground. All accidents are controlled by these causes. And if the chance of one battle—that is, a particular cause—has brought a state to ruin, some general cause made it necessary for that state to perish from a single battle. In a word, the main trend draws with it all particular accidents.”

Ironically the “one battle—that is, the particular cause bringing the US Government to ruin was a battle over Segregation of a White Farm Community in Plains Georgia fought by President Jimmy Carter for Charles and Shirley Sherrod against the Segregationist Senator Herman Talmadge and the Lieutenant Governor of Georgia Lester Maddox.

Ironically in 1862, Isaac Newton, the first commissioner of US agriculture, reported to his president, Abraham Lincoln, that haciendas brought down Rome. The message to the country was pretty clear: small family farmers were the foundations of the American Republic. How history rhymes America.

Former President Jimmy Carter on the State of American Government.


You can read the full story of the Goss Conspiracy Undue Process to Treason by downloading a copy of the current manuscript in progress on this blog. Here. The Goss Conspiracy Undue Process to Treason.

Spirit of the Laws [No Apathy]

Spirit of the Laws [No Apathy]

Most Americans seem clueless about their citizen responsibilities. Principal enlightenment historian, author, and engineer of the U.S. Constitutions foundation  Montesquieu; warned citizens in the treatise  Spirit of the Laws:      

The tyranny of a prince in an oligarchy is not so dangerous to the public welfare as the apathy of a citizen in a democracy.  Montesquieu, Spirit of the laws, 1748.

Montesquieu warned citizens not to become apathetic with how their Government is performing or loose site of Governments actions. Fables of Cicero tell us why.

“The traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.”

Unfortunately, after the Bill(s) of rights, American, British, French, and more, humanity lost touch with the roots of war, thousands of years of human history, the rise and fall of Kings, Monarchies, Dynasties, Feudal warlords, Religions. How and why these governments rose to power and what caused them to come hurtling down.

My question for humanity?

Is it  perhaps time to consider a very different kind of Government construct?  How did Einstein define Apathy?

“Any man who reads too much and uses his own brain too little falls into lazy habits of thinking.” Albert Einstein 

Could we all step OutSide the Box, work together, use our minds, redefine Governing of humanity and the planet on truth, science, knowledge, and like nature focus on the pursuit of humanities perfection?

Ask Giordano Bruno This time if we join together they want hang us ALL. Considered Father of Modern Science.  

Twenty five hundred years ago Confucius had done just that. Imagine 2,500 years ago just trying to survive in the world without electricity, running water, cars, bicycles. Think about it all, it’s a pretty extensive list yet, Confucius is known to have spent time studying chinese history when developing his philosophy, in fact, it was his quest to find those things in Chinese history that made a dynasty great and what made them fall. He sought the best ways to Govern and to rule a society. Can you imagine how hard it was in that time period to actually keep history available for consumption? Or just to share your thoughts OutSide the Box.

Is it time to consider flipping Confucius quest?

Can we think OutSide the Box?

Rather than being imprisoned by government or religion how might humanity imprison them?

Confucius died believing his philosophies a failure, but his seeds grew roots and his philosophical teachings became among the world’s most prolific.

The rise and fall of the Roman empire would follow, great philosophers Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Epicureanism, came and went contemplating, debating, teaching, refining the arts of reason, exploring the depths of their ability to understand the nature of the world around them. What was their purpose? What was the best way to live, where do ethics and morality originate, what is this place I call reality? A thousand years, no tv, no motorized transportation, no phone, no internet, just philosophical ideas shared on handwritten documents often duplicated with room for error. More than a thousand years of philosophical effort, thought, contemplation by the greatest of thinkers. Today’s humanity is mostly ignorant of their work, too lazy to exercise their minds with such hefty thought.To lazy even to learn what they thought or what the importance or validity of their thought. I’m still will likly spend the rest of my life trying to catch up with them. For anyone reading this. I tell my own daughter Philosophize This with I;am Stephen West is an extraordinary free learning opportunity.

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”  Unless nature decides humanity’s to stupid to keep.

Is there a glitch in humanities program code causing it to dump critical data? Is Humanity like AI taught to think and reason and yet with the input of garbage is garbage?

For thousands of years governments rise and fall each demanding its citizens follow their doctrines of faith. Greek Gods, roman rule and the streets of Athens would give rise to sophist men who taught various artful forms of winning ones case without any moral ethic resolve but purely to win.

Socrates himself gave his own life by presenting what’s considered the worst legal defense in history. He basically refused to abandoned his principal belief in living a virtuous life. He refused lying to the court to avoid punishment for an offense he’d not committed. Forced to drink poison for being accused a sophist, liar, lawyer after the Oligarchs of death lost power over Rome in the age of Thirty Tyrants of Athens.The people had not stood for the despotism of oligarchs must we? After the tyrants the people had little trust. Why would they? 

Hundreds, thousands of Gods who never seemed to answer the people’s prayers came and went regardless of the sacrifices.  From the ashes of Europe, China, Asia, India, and the Middle East rose Buddhism, Taoism, Catholicism, Hebraism, Islam, Christianity.  A diversity of faiths. For hundreds of years to follow religious wars raged as the dark ages ensued. In Europe the reformation led to war after war between Protestants and Catholics. From these beginnings came the ages of enlightenment and  the Philosopher, antarchist,  John Locke, and Montesquieu, philosopher, lawyer, politician, author of the most authoritative contemplated treatise on the operation of Government known to America’s founding fathers. John Locke English philosopher and physician, widely regarded as one of the most influential of Enlightenment thinkers and commonly known as the “Father of Liberalism. These men lived times when the only form of education was the passing of history through the written word and the modes of transportation were challenging to say the least.

Protestants and Catholics warred in France and a relative calm settled over France despite the strife between the Catholics and the Huguenots (French Protestants), the court of Henry III was then dominated by a tolerant faction of the Politiques (moderate Catholics, sympathizers of the Protestant King of Navarre, Henry of Bourbon, who became heir apparent to the throne of France in 1584. Here in Paris France lived Giordano Bruno an Italian Dominican friar, philosopher, mathematician, poet, and cosmological theorist who proposed theories of an infinite universe with a multiplicity of worlds.

The Roman Catholic and Reformed Churches of the  time were struggling for the evangelization of Europe. Giordano believed Lucretius the universe was infinite, his god was infinite, and creation could be nothing less. He was excommunicated by the Roman Catholic Church for his beliefs.

Bruno abandoned the Dominican order, and, after wandering in northern Italy, he went in 1578 to Geneva, where he earned his living by proofreading. He formally embraced Calvinism. After publishing a broadsheet against a Calvinist professor, however, he discovered that the Reformed church was no less intolerant than the Catholic. He was arrested, excommunicated, rehabilitated after retraction, and finally allowed to leave the city. He moved to France, first to Toulouse—where he unsuccessfully sought to be absolved by the Catholic church but was nevertheless appointed to a lectureship in philosophy—and then in 1581 to Paris.

In Paris Bruno at last found a congenial place to work and teach. Despite the strife between the Catholics and the Huguenots (French Protestants), the court of Henry III was then dominated by the tolerant faction of the Politiques Bruno’s religious attitude was compatible with this group, and he received the protection of the French king, who appointed him one of his temporary lecteursroyaux. In 1582 Bruno published three mnemotechnical works, in which he explored new means to attain an intimate knowledge of reality. He also published a vernacular comedy, Il candelaio (1582; “The Candlemaker”), which, through a vivid representation of contemporary Neapolitan society, constituted a protest against the moral and social corruption of the time The Spaccio de la bestia trionfante (1584; The Expulsion of the Triumphant Beast), the first dialogue of his moral trilogy, is a satire on contemporary superstitions and vices, embodying a strong criticism of Christian ethics—particularly the Calvinistic principle of salvation by faith alone, to which Bruno opposes an exalted view of the dignity of all human activities. The Cabala del cavallo Pegaseo (1585; “Cabal of the Horse Pegasus”), similar to but more pessimistic than the previous work, includes a discussion of the relationship between the human soul and the universal soul, concluding with the negation of the absolute individuality of the former. In the De gli eroici furori (1585; The Heroic Frenzies), Bruno, making use of Neoplatonic imagery, treats the attainment of union with the infinite One by the human soul and exhorts man to the conquest of virtue and truth.

Can we think OutSide the Box to redefine the constructs of humanity for the conquest of virtue and truth?

January 27, 1593, Bruno entered the jail of the Roman palace of the Sant’Uffizio (Holy Office).

During the seven-year Roman period of the trial, Bruno at first developed his previous defensive line, disclaiming any particular interest in theological matters and reaffirming the philosophical character of his speculation. This distinction did not satisfy the inquisitors, who demanded an unconditional retraction of his theories. Bruno then made a desperate attempt to demonstrate that his views were not incompatible with the Christian conception of God and creation. The inquisitors rejected his arguments and pressed him for a formal retraction. Bruno finally declared that he had nothing to retract and that he did not even know what he was expected to retract. At that point, Pope Clement VIII ordered that he be sentenced as an impenitent and pertinacious heretic. On February 8, 1600, when the death sentence was formally read to him, he addressed his judges, saying:

“Perhaps your fear in passing judgment on me is greater than mine in receiving it.

Time is the father of truth, its mother is our mind.

Time takes all and gives all.”

Bruno was hung naked upside down and burned at the stake by the Church’s of the Day. For Thinking OutSide the Box.

In 1609 Considered beginning of the age of enlightenment Galileo invented the telescope and proposed a Heliocentric universe causing a conflict with the Catholic Church and he was put under house arrest by the inquisition for spreading ideas in contrast with religious doctrine. Galileo’s ideas were a key role in the scientific revolution inspired through Enlightenment, where people were turning to rationalization through science and questioning the great authority the Church had in the time period.

The Thirty Years’ War ended in 1648. It led to the division of Western Christianity into different confessions (CatholicLutheranReformedAnglicanAnabaptistUnitarian, etc.). By the time of its arrival, Western Christianity was only compromised in the Lands of the Bohemian Crown, where Utraquist Hussitism was officially acknowledged by both the Pope and the Holy Roman Emperor; in addition, various movements (includingLollards in England and Waldensians In Italy and France) were still being actively suppressed.

As William the Silent wrote in his marriage proposal to the uncle of his second wife, the Elector August of Saxony, he held Orange as “my own free property”, not as a fief of any suzerain; neither the Pope, nor the Kings of Spain or France.[8][9] That historical position of honor and reputation would later drive William the Silent forward, as much as it also fueled the opposition of his great grandson William III to Louis XIV, when that king invaded and occupied Orange.

The last descendant of the original princes, René of Châlon, left the principality to his cousin William the Silent, who was not a descendant of the original Orange family but the heir to the principality of Orange by testament, however in violation against the inheritance pattern enacted by the last will of Marie des Baux, the Princess of Orange through kinship to whom Prince René derived his own right thereto.

Louis XIV of France began his personal rule of France in 1661, after the death of his chief minister, the Italian Cardinal Mazarin.[3]An adherent of the concept of the divine right of kings, which advocates the divine origin of monarchical rule, Louis continued his predecessors’ work of creating a centralised state governed from the capital. He sought to eliminate the remnants of feudalism persisting in parts of France and, by compelling many members of the nobility to inhabit his lavish Palace of Versailles, succeeded in pacifying the aristocracy, many members of which had participated in the Fronde rebellion during Louis’ minority. By these means he became one of the most powerful French monarchs and consolidated a system of absolute monarchical rule in France that endured until the French Revolution. History never repeats but always rhymes. 

Louis encouraged and benefited from the work of prominent political, military, and cultural figures such as MazarinColbertLouvois, the Grand CondéTurenneSébastien Le Prestre de VaubanAndré Charles BoulleMolièreRacineBoileauLa FontaineLullyMaraisLe BrunRigaudBossuetLe VauMansartCharlesClaude Perrault, and Le Nôtre.

During Louis’ reign, France was the leading European power, and it fought three major wars: the Franco-Dutch War, the War of the League of Augsburg, and the War of the Spanish Succession. There were also two lesser conflicts: the War of Devolution and the War of the Reunions. Warfare defined the foreign policy of Louis XIV, and his personality shaped his approach. Impelled “by a mix of commerce, revenge, and pique”, Louis sensed that warfare was the ideal way to enhance his glory. In peacetime he concentrated on preparing for the next war. He taught his diplomats that their job was to create tactical and strategic advantages for the French military.[4]  Were the views of the Catholic Church of France the same?

In 1673, Louis XIV of France annexed all territory of the principality to France and to the royal domain, as part of the war actions against the stadtholder William III of Orange — who later became King William III of Great Britain. Orange ceased to exist as a sovereign realm, de facto. And my ancestors were banished from the land they’d held for over a thousand years on the Rhone the AOC of St Julien.  The loss of these lands by Pérrié De St Julien I De Malacare is documented in parliamentary records of England in his petitions for funds for  protestant french Huguenots to travel to America. See St Julien De Malacare in the History of Huguenot Pedigree.  

This is the history in which my ancestral  roots run deep David DeCros St Julian was born 1605 in Béziers, Herault, Languedoc-Roussillon, France. David had a son Pierre de St Julien De Malacare I  formerly St Julian aka Julien born 1641 in Vitré, Ille-et-Vilaine, Bretagne, France Pierre’s wife Jeanne (LeFebre) de St. Julien  gave birth  to twin sons in 1669. Pierre  living in fear under the rule of Louis the XIV for his progeny named his sons Pierre Renee De St. Julien I 1 & 2 The birth record reflecting a single son But twins who would  carry the same name, known only to close friends and family they were René and Piérré. Rene and Pierre had an older sister Aimee de St. Julian; born 3, 7, 1667  Charlotte Ravenel; born 5,15,1668 a younger brother Louis de St. Julian; Born 08,5,1670 sister Marguerite de St. Julian; Born 12,19,1671 younger brother Paul de St. Julian; Born 10,14.1673 and sisters Emilie de St. Julian; Born 1, 10,1675  Jeanne Renee de St. Julian Born 5,6, 1678 and Marie Ester de St. Julien Born 12,14,1679.

In April of 1680 the ship Richmond arrived in Charleston SC with 45 French Protestants (Huguenots) aboard.This needs further verification because for centuries now the truth has been hidden by numerous facts,

  • Piérré De St Julien De Malacare I. Did not travel on the Richmond, today’s historical records show unequivocally he traveled to the UK with William of Orange, his wife, and several children to live in Ireland.
  • Piérre [Rene] actually Piérre De St Julien De Malacare II was on the Richmond with his wife, is brother Louis  and  Sister Marguerite, Four St Juliens. Piérré’s buried and his will recorded in Charleston SC in French.
  • Rene De St Julien De Malacare  Piérré’s twin brother René Petit was also not on the Richmond and traveled to the UK with William II to lead dragoons in the Glorious revolution and the Battle of Boyne.
  • Fore centuries now people have wondered what happened to Rene Petit and Piérré Fore and have never concluded who they really were.
  • On the Ships Manifest, In the Petitions to England’s Parliament, see Royale Gem Of Malacare. The identities of these Individuals was obscured. See the Manifest. Piérré, His Wife, and a Friend are listed as his friend, his friend, and alsoe his friend. Their names not listed. More research is needed but I believe Piérré’s twin brother Réné filed the petitions with parliament, booked himself on the Richmond, his Brother Piérré and his wife. But, that he did not make the voyage which is verifiable in the annals of history. This was all done to keep there wearabouts from being known by Louis XIV, Catholic Churches, and the Reformed Churches of the time.Piérré De St Julien was a descendant of Piérré De St Julien friend of the apostle Peter where together they been fisherman in youth on the Rhone.

In 1685 under the rule of Louis XIV of France the Edict of Nantes, which granted rights to Huguenots, was abolished. The revocation effectively forced Huguenots to emigrate or convert in a wave of dragonnades, which managed to virtually destroy the French Protestant minority divesting French Protestants of all religious and political prerogatives. The English were happy to encourage these refugees to settle in the colonies, most of whom were representative of France’s prosperous merchant and professional classes. More refugees followed, and in 1687, a church was built on what is now the corner of Church St. and Queen St. in downtown Charleston. About four hundred and fifty Huguenots had settled in the Low Country of South Carolina by 1700. 

In 1679 Pierre a presbyterian minister and wife Jeanne and children all fled France through the Netherlands. From France Charlotte, Pierre II, Louis, and Marguerite set sail for America landing in Charleston South Carolina, Pierre  de St Julien De Malacare I  and siblings are  contained in the list known as the “St:Julien” or “Ravenel” list. This is a list of French and Swiss  refugees in Carolina who desired to be naturalized. Its date by comparison of names with births has been fixed at about 1696. It was found among the papers of Henry de St: Julien of St Johns Berkley who died in 1768 or 1769 and was the youngest son of Pierre de St: Julien mentioned in the list. His papers came into the possession of M’. Daniel Ravenel of Wantoot and the list was first published in 1822 in the Southern Intelligencer a paper published in Charleston. It was re-published in 1867 and again in pamphlet form by T. Gaillard Thomas M. D. in 1888; and in 1897 in the Transactions of the Huguenot Society of S. C. These same documents list Marie, Charles Fromagett as Pierre’s wife at the time he purchased transportation for what is believed to be 27 individuals aboard the Richmond which arrived in Charleston SC in the fall of 1680.These documents have inconsistencies which are explainable with truth.

I have discovered the Analysis of the names of these individuals is inaccurate and has been misunderstood by historians all these years. While others may have figured this out I’ve found no indication that’s the case. So for posterity I wish to explain why I believe their analysis was seriously flawed. I don’t have time now to work on analyzing the correct numbers .But I will explain for those who might pursue it why I claim the current analysis is flawed. First historians have not accepted that individuals on the Richmond were French it is stated in the record that while they believed that to be true they did not have solid information on which to establish that fact. The internet and ancestral records verify that in fact my ancestor Piérré and his family were all in fact French Huguenots fleeing the persecution of Louis XIV of France

The Richmonds travel to America is known to have been have been Commissioned and is documented to have been chartered by Rene Petit and Jacob Guerard. The number of Individuals on the Richmond is extrapolated as stated by the South Carolina Historical Society as follows:

“Considering the connection between the names of Guerard and Petit with the immigrants on the Richmond, and the apparent coincidence of the dates of arrival of the other names mentioned with the probable date of arrival of the Richmond, the names mentioned are as close as the writer has been able to get to the probable names of the French Protestant passengers on that vessel.”

So while there are many mistakes in the analysis. This the first and perhaps largest. Guérard and Petit are not family names they’re French words. Guérard is actually spelled Guérard  and is a French commune  in  North central France. The word means “not in accordance with philosophic knowledge or methods an unphilosophic judgment” Parliamentary England details confirm the funds for the Richmond and the land grants were secured by  William II  .

” The letter of the Proprietors to lay out 4000 acres to Jacob Guerard which went by the Richmond was dated 17 Deer 1679″

Petit actually Pétit is actually French for Small and I believe was reference for the petitioners of land grants.  I also believe for various reasons that 17 Deer is not a date at all but a reference to 17 individuals from the Comtat Venaissin an enclave in the Kingdom of France which included the town of Orange and Avignon and was known as the Principality of Orange. The Enclave had been bequeathed to the Holy See in 1271. The enclaves inhabitants did not pay taxes and were not subject to military service, making life in the Comtat considerably more attractive than under the French Crown.1. When Louis XIVinvaded and occupied the Principality of Orange. Perrie, Renee St Julien a Protestant minister in the province of Orange and owner of St Juliens in the province of Orange between Orange and Avignon on the Rhone river at a junction known as Guérard. Protestants including William of Orange fleed the rule of Louis XIV and sought refuge in Guérard commune of north east of France just outside paris.They fought their last battle in August 1678 at the battle of St Denis.   

The Richmond set sail from ? England or Netherlands October 29, 1679.

Arrived in South Carolina and the First of Issue of land as instructed by William II were made in South Carolina on August 5, 1680.

According to the South Carolina Historical And Genealogical Magazine published by the South Carolina Historical Society Charleston S.C January 1917. In December of 1686 Pierre purchased the Ponkin Hill Plantation

“which included the French Settlement which gave for a time to the adjoining vicinity the name of Orange or French Quarter.”

The Plantation adjoins the land on which the Episcopal Chapel “St. Thomas’ parish now stands known as the Ponkinhill “Chapel. Pierre de St Julien I and his wife Jeanne (LeFebre) de St. Julien along with Aimee and the younger children Paul, Emilie, Jeanne, and Marie.     

René De St Julien sailed with William III of Orange to the United Kingdom where there William took the English Crown in the Bloodless War.

Royale Gem of Malacare.

Royale Gem of Malacare.

Pope Francis,

I believe I’m descendant of Peter St Julien,Pope Clement I neither St Julien nor Clementine, are pious fiction. I’m a Protestant, Huguenot, Apostle PIerre cousin of William keeper of the Parish of St Denis in the Holy See in the Commune St Julien keeper Guérard. 

The Kingdom of Comtat Vennisan , Juliens ancestrial home, should be returned to the rightful Heirs.

 Linage of Réné Petit. St Julien De Malacare.

Piérré St Julien De Malacare was born into the Thirty Years War, a Protestant Minister of the Reformations in the Comtat Vinnisan. He ministered through the French Wars of Religion in the Heart of the Holy See. He had two first sons and separated his family to ensure Gérard of Malacare. His land St Julen adjoined the Medoc’s on the Rhine was commandeered by Louis XIV. They escaped with their lives from France after the Battle of St Denis  August 78 with the reciprocation and help of  cousin William of Orange in 1679. In Fact he bought them all safe passage and provided them with 8,000 acres in Charleston South Carolina. Where Piérré AND his brother Réné established the Plantation of Pompion Hill, The Pompion Hill Chapel The Parish of St Denis, the Quarter of Orange, The Principality of Orange in America. The First American French Quarter. The First French in America all delivered to Charleston SC to Gérard the jewel of malacare.  

first orange quarter south carolina

the south carolina historical and genalogical magazine volume xviii 1917 pgs 105- 106.

the south carolina historical and genalogical magazine volume xviii 1917 pgs 106- 107.

the south carolina historical and genalogical magazine volume xviii 1917 pgs 107.

the south carolina historical and genalogical magazine volume xviii 1917 pgs 108.

the south carolina historical and genalogical magazine volume xviii 1917 pgs 108-109.

the south carolina historical and genalogical magazine volume xviii 1917 pgs 109

Christopher B. St Julien De Mala Care Gérard Royal Jewels House of Orange.



History always rhymes!

“Fahy says farmers are facing more stress now than they have since the farming crisis of the 1980s, when hundreds of farms were auctioned on the courthouse steps across the country each month and thousands of farmers faced financial ruin. “ Their dad killed himself on the farm where he was born. They hope his story will save others. Story by Jessica Ravitz CNN August 21, 2018

The farm crisis of the 1980s’ occurred because of the gross negligent management of government policies and regulations by Congress as detailed in the USDA publication “A Time to Choose” 1980 by Robert Bergland.

Ronald Regan upon assuming the presidency chose corporate mega farming over rural small and mid size farms. He promoted global trade effectively outsourcing much of farming to Africa, Mexico, and Chile and placing local production into the hands of large corporate players like Cargill, Tyson, Dole, etc. Farm credit agencies got swamped in bad loans as USDA/FSA personnel had flooded the market with sub prime farm loans under the false assumptions more production the better, the bigger the better, Farms need more equipment to increase production and yield. Farms need to get bigger to improve economies of scale. Or where they intentionally using government funds to create an intentional bubble profiting on the rise, sucking up the assets on the fall, and profiting on resale of ill gotten real estate.

When public and private funding vaporized farmers turned to the lender of last resort the USDA.

USDA personnel were holding that loaded gun aimed at farmers seeking credit and had zero training on the use of that gun. Were completely uneducated in its use and then Regan reduces credit availability by 23% in every state killing hundreds of thousands of small  & midsize farmers. This wasn’t just killing available credit Reagan wanted a 23% reduction in outstanding loan dollars. And FmHa responded with robo foreclosures the Courts found in violation of the Constitution. 

Congress, Bush, and Clinton set out to clean up Congresses mess by eliminating accountability for their complete incompetence in the management of farm policy trade, regulations, and the USDA. Congress and Clinton institutionalized a criminal and unconstitutional racket pinned to deference and aided by the US Judiciary to avoid any future accountability for negligence, fraud, discrimination, or just outright criminal behaviors by USDA personnel. An un accountable government agency armed with a a loaded gun their not trained to use while their victims are bated into the traps government continues to create.   

The Federal Judiciary told Congress to pass the Separation of Powers restoration act to fix Governments gross criminal and unconstitutional denial of Due Process.  Justice Scalia, Thomas, and Roberts in case briefs and Scalia in public statements made it known the Supreme Court would look at reversing the doctrine of deference because its unconstitutional and extremely abused by Government and the Federal Judiciary. See Whitman v. United States, 574 U.S. ___ (November 10, 2014).  Scalia   “ I doubt the Government’s pretensions to deference. They collide with the norm that legislatures, not executive officers, define crimes. When King James I tried to create new crimes  by royal command, the judges responded that “the King cannot create any offense by his prohibition or proclamation, which was not an offense before.”  James I, however, did not have the benefit of Chevron deference.  With deference to agency interpretations of statu­tory provisions to which criminal prohibitions are at­tached, federal administrators can in effect create (and uncreate) new crimes  at will, so long as they do not roam beyond ambiguities that the laws contain [internal citations omitted]”


Justices Scalia and Thomas Amenable to Reexamining Deference to SEC Statutory Interpretations

Perez v. Mortgage Bankers association No . 13-1041 December 1, 2014 – Decided March 9, 2015.

judicial deference to agency interpretive rules cannot be squared with the constitutional structures of separation of powers, and checks and balances.”[Emphasis added]

Update 9-17-18 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES UNITED STUDENT AID FUNDS, INC. v. BRYANA BIBLE May 16, 2016 Scoutus deny’s challenge to Auer deference on Constitutionality. Read this and you will find members of the Supreme Court admitting there Co-Conspirators with Government Agencies in war on the Constitutional rights of Due Process and Equal Justice.Do I need a jury trial to convict them of Treason when they have admitted guilt? Here is another more recent statement of the same thing. How many years will the public allow tyranny? Thomas and Gorsuch

Justice Scalia suffered a mysterious circumstantial death February 13, 2016 just as an excellent case to address deference was in the Federal Circuit. ”MINE” Justice Kavanugh gave a deference dog whistle speech outlining his concurrence with Scalia’s views on the subject June 2, 2016. In march of 2017 at the Confirmation hearings of Neil Gorsuch Senator Al Franken expresses the democrats objections to the reversal of deference.

Congress knows and has known they are criminally and unconstitutionally abusing deference. See history on Separation of Powers restoration Act. The Federal Judiciary has known and knows Government agencies are criminally and unconstitutionally abusing deference. See the cases referenced above. The Federal Judiciary has an absolutely abysmal record of providing Due Process. Congress is never removing judges in what looks like a quid pro quo. It all stinks of a Government warring against providing Due Process as the Constitution requires as they kill off more and more farmers like me with Treason. Who is master, who is slave? 

Who is master, who is slave?

Who is master, who is slave?


President of the United States                                                                            July 11 2018
Donald J. Trump
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Re: Racketeering by the US Government!

Dear Mr. President,

First it’s often stated fact this country is founded on the rule of law. However, it’s rarely, if ever stated the rule law governs this nation, as it has become increasingly corrupt.

The rule of law states no man may sit in judgment of his own case. As an individual harmed by criminal conspiracies of the US Government, it is my allegation and assertion all branches of the US Government have conspired in an act of treason on the Constitution, the American people, and especially Americas farmers.

Thomas Jefferson said: “ I consider trial by jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.” His sentiment was echoed often by founding fathers.

My allegation asserts all branches of the US Government have conspired including the U.S. Federal Judiciary, the Legislature, and the Executive branches most notably of the USDA.

You have publically stated numerous times as Attorney General Jeff Sessions has the intent to uphold the laws of this country and you both took the oath of office to uphold supreme law the Constitution.

Consequently, I demand for the benefit of the public good, the US Government founded on the rule of law, abide by the rule of law, and stand trial before a jury of US citizens for treason. Furthermore, I request trial be presided over by an impartial judge from an international court.

I do not want to see some blatant obfuscating form letter response but a direct, specific, and reasoned reply to my petition to which I have a right under the first and fourteenth amendments to the Constitution.

Thank you Mr. President for your time and your service. I look forward to hearing from you.




Christopher. B. Julian On behalf of We The People.

The Julian Family
8908 Sharonbrook dr.
Charlotte, NC 28210


CC:   Chief Justice John Roberts
Supreme Court of the United States
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543

Attorney General
Jeff Sessions
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

Senate Judiciary Committee Chair
Senator Chuck Grassley
135 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510

Congressional Judiciary Committee Chair
Congressman Bob Goodlatte
2309 Rayburn HOB
Washington, DC 203515

United States Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530

American Civil Liberties Union
Washington Legislative Office
915 15th St NW, Washington DC 20005

Update 10-10-2018 The UN has indicated willingness to hear such a case against the US. Government.  See the Opt-In Press release here. 

Justice; Chief Justice John Roberts!

Justice; Chief Justice John Roberts!

Chief Justice John Roberts,

Justice Louis Brandeis known as the peoples judge said “Decency, security and liberty alike demand that government officials shall be subjected to the rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen” No man is above the law so the confirmation hearings say.

Today Executive branches of the U.S. government are running criminal enterprises in violation of Federal laws, federal antitrust laws, and the Constitution. Three times I previously brought this matter to the attention of then President Barack Obama. Please refer to the correspondence which can be found on this blog. None of the communications was ever addressed.

Congress approved the implementation of these enterprises in violation of the Constitution and their oaths of office. Consequently, they do not want their despicable deeds exposed. I have multiple times by mail and phone requested of Congressman Morgan Griffth the opportunity to address Congress regarding this matter.  No request was ever acknowledged. You may also refer to written correspondence evidenced in this blog.

These enterprises are specifically designed for the obstruction of justice, to deny due process, to deny equal protection, and to deny fair hearings. These procedures are an absolute abysmal affront to Due Process, American values, and the Constitution.

Three times I’ve brought these allegations into Federal Courts with the filing of Civil Lawsuits. For Five years Government has refused to allow a fair hearing on these matters. Each dismissed by corrupt federal officials who’ve used lies, deceit, deception and down right criminal acts to subvert these allegations. Enough is Enough as Clarence Thomas Said When Anita Hill lied, I purpose to aid the treason afoot.

If anyone has any doubts Federal Judges lied about material evidence against the USDA’s racketeering enterprise to aid, abet, and protect the Governments treason, I respectfully request you look at the evidence presented in other post on this blog, Here is a list of post to start with: Please leave your opinion in the comments.

Corrupt Federal District Court Of Federal District Judge Jackson L. Kiser – Traitor

Dumb and Dumber, Judges Don’t Know English!

Federal Court Opinion Balances Scales of Justice With Lies!

If you want to know about the implementation of this criminal enterprise and the treason that created it. You can read about that here.

Thomas Jefferson Explains Path to Oligarchy! William Jefferson Clinton Perfects It!

Treason & The Good Ole Boy Network; The ABA Within!

And don’t forget to check out other links to evidence.

The Federal Judiciary is aiding, abetting, and protecting these criminal enterprises and even gifting them with the ability to write new laws at will avoiding accountability for criminal and civil violations of Federal law against the people they’re supposed to serve. See the Statements of the Supreme Court on deference made over the last five years in the Courts rulings. See the Separation of powers Restoration Act which implements the recommendations Justice Antonin Scalia made to congress to eliminate the treason afoot by Government Agencies many years ago.

These acts Sir are in violation of the government’s contractual obligation to operate legally and within the law. These acts are a complete and utterly criminal violation of the Constitutions intent for the separation of powers. These acts Sir have the Government warring against the Constitution and against the American people. These acts Sir, are acts of treason as defined by the Constitution of the United States.

As you should now beware, Sir, these criminal, unAmerican, and unconstitutional allegations, allege a criminal conspiracy of wrongdoing by every branch of the US Government. It’s a tenant of the rule of law that no man may preside over his own case. I, therefore, submit that this case must be heard against the US Government by a Jury of the American people and its criminal operations must be stopped.

The rule of law states: The Law should govern a nation as opposed to being governed by the arbitrary decisions of individual government officials. The Judiciary has repeatedly corruptly, maliciously, relied solely on arbitrary decisions of corrupt Government officials in the judiciary aiding, abetting, and protecting the Government’s criminal and unconstitutional RICO enterprises. They’re guilty of Treason by conspiring, aiding, and abetting domestic enemies of the Constitution and the American people.

This country is founded on the rule of law. If it’s to be governed by the rule of law then All branches of Government must stand trial as defendants and defend themselves before a jury of unbiased civilian jurist.

To Quote Thomas Jefferson:

“Trial by jury is the only anchor yet ever imagined by man, which can hold a government accountable to the principles of its constitution.”

John Adams called trial by Jury:

“the heart of liberty.”

James Madison said:

“Trial by jury in civil cases is as essential to secure the liberty of the people as any one of the pre-existent rights of nature”

As Justice Brandeis said:

“A government of laws will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. If a government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for the law; it invites every man to come a law unto himself. It invites anarchy.”

The prophecy of Edlbridge Gerry  declining to sign the Constitution and the warnings of Thomas Jefferson in 1820 are proven accurate.

How Sir can I, can any of us, have anything but contempt for a judiciary that’s aiding, abetting, and protecting illegal and unconstitutional operations of the people’s government? How should I, or any of us, not have contempt for a Government operating above the law and against justice for its people? The American people cannot address Government Corruption in Corrupted Courts under their control. The people should awaken to fact corruption permeates the  Judiciary and it should no longer be allowed to Judge itself in dismissing facts.

This petition is made pursuant to the First Amendment to the Constitution the right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The Government is not entitled to immunity in this matter because its sovereignty cannot supersede the Government’s agency requirements as defined, by the Constitution, by the Contract, which gave rise to the existence of Government, a contract which requires Government to operate legally and within the law.

I cite and incorporate for reference and submit as evidence the Judiciary is criminally corrupt all procedural records of filings, appeals, including the appeal to the supreme court, writs, the dockets, and all supporting documentation, including the actual dockets for the following cases.: 4:13-cv-0054, 1-15-1544C, and 3-16-cv-173. That is, an honest factual assessment of all filings in these cases will suffice to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the Government is guilty of treason.

The courts are thus aware of the evidence against them and the allegations of the criminal enterprises as complained of in the aforementioned cases. They may not preside over nor dismiss a case against them without a proper and fair hearing. Since the complaint alleges criminal wrongdoing and conspiracy by the judiciary, including the willful intent to obstruct justice. The judiciary has neither the right nor the Authority to dismiss this case. Plaintiff demands the US Government including the Judiciary stand trial for TREASON! Before a Jury of American Citizens.

Failure of the Judiciary to defend itself before a Jury is admission this country is no longer founded or governed by the rule of law but is in fact under the rule of a Criminal enterprise of despots and traitors.

Please readers watch this Facebook post its all related to the Treason i’ve been fighting.

The Traitor Federal District Court Judge Jackson L. Kiser is now railroading another case. This one a young man who’s fighting to prove his innocence and having his every effort to gain access to the evidence to exonerate him criminally obstructed. See:

The Case of Brian Hill


No one in a Republic is above the law, above the supreme law; not even the judiciary!


Christopher B. Julian Pro Se.