Treason from Within Via the ABA!

Treason from Within Via the ABA!

A criminal enterprise curtesy of the ABA treason within the United States Government!

The Secretary of Agriculture is a member of the Presidents cabinet consequently; he’s a member of the Executive branch of Government. Note both were or are members of the ABA.

Congress unable to handle their duties allowed the establishment of Agencies with both Legislative and Judicial authority which established entities not contemplated by the constitution and usurping separation of constitutional powers. For more information on that See Thomas Jefferson Explains Path to Oligarchy William Jefferson Clinton Perfects It! Slide1

The USDA is an Agency reporting to the Secretary of Agriculture and it, and its subsidiaries like the Farm Service Agency (FSA) have authority to promulgate regulations interpreting congressional legislation and having the full force of federal law. These regulations are prescribed to the public in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).

The Secretary of Agriculture by Executive authority promulgated into law the National Appeals Division (NAD) with authority to administer all administrative hearings of agencies under the Secretary of Agriculture. Subsequently, he promulgated into law the National Appeals Divison would not be required to adhere to the Federal Rules of Evidence. Rules of Evidence derived from centuries of precedent defining Due Process. See Tom Vilsack Before Hispanic Caucus Slide1

A Summary of these facts shows the Secretary of Agriculture has Executive, legislative, and judicial power in direct contradiction to the constitutional intention for checks and balances in Government by maintaining separation of power.

  1. The Secretary of Agriculture utilizing this unconstitutional power is running an enterprise designed to deny individuals the constitutional guarantee of Due Process and Equal Justice under the law. This Enterprise is contrary to the Governments due process obligation under the Supreme Law, the constitution of the United States to operate legally and within the law.
  2. The Department of Agriculture uses this enterprise to avoid being held accountable or responsible for violations of Federal Law and Federal regulations they have promulgated into the code of Federal regulations. In other words they use the enterprise to protect themselves from being held accountable to Federal Law or responsible for violating Federal Law.
  3. The USDA/FSA has for decades used this criminal unconstitutional enterprise to inflict all manner of despotic tyranny, torture, and terrorism for all manner of destruction in the lives, livelihoods, health and causing all manner of family destruction in the lives of thousands including my family.

B. Federal Courts have aided and abetted this criminal enterprise by granting agencies like USDA, FSA, NAD the ability to interpret their regulations with any arguable interpretation, even interpretations contrary to the plain language of the regulation and it’s underlying statute as my case demonstrates and is discussed in Dumb and Dumber Judges Don’t Know English!

  1. Today the Federal Judiciary protects this criminal enterprise by granting them sovereign immunity protection from their constitutional obligation to operate legally. Additionally, they aid and abet this enterprise by freely granting Chevron deference.
  2. In this manner the Federal Judiciary has become a co conspirator with the Executive branch in a criminal enterprise granting them power above the law, the supreme law – The constitution of the United States, and in opposition to the true sovereign We The People.
  3. Effectively, the Executive and Judicial branches of Government are acting in their own interest above the law waging war on We The People. What are the United States, if not the embodied representation of We The People? Corrupt Federal Agencies Aidded By Corrupt Federal Judges

C. Article III Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution – Treason.

  1. “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them“ (We The People ? ), “or in adhering to their Enemies.” Enemies of (We The People)
  2. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason”
  3. Is the Court of Federal Claims the agent of Congress?

On the receiving end of numerous acts of negligence, fraud, discrimination, and other criminal acts meeting predicate requirements for a civil action against the USDA/FSA for racketeering under Title 18 Chapter 96 sections 1961 – 1968; I filed a civil suit against the responsible individuals and enterprises in Federal Court on September 16, 2013. Case #4:13-cv-00054 JLK RSB.

  1. I relied on the promise of congress in Title 18 Chapter 96 section 1964(c) as an individual with standing, I would for compensation of my time as an attorney and cost, assume the role of prosecutor to remove this criminal enterprise from the legitimate operations of Government. To which I was promised a reward of treble damages for the prosecution.
  2. Under the constitution Article III Clause III Federal Crimes must be tried before a jury. The Defendants right in this case.
  3. Under the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution, Civil claims in Federal Court must be tried before a jury. The Plaintiffs right in this case.

I say Superior Federal District Court Judge Jackson l. Kiser violated his oath of office, my constitutional rights, federal laws and unconstitutionally converted the lawsuit in D for operation of the RICO enterprise described in A. to a cause of action for torts under the FTCA. Furthermore, he proceeded in violation of my constitutional and procedural rights into judicial review and decided for himself over valid objections to his jurisdiction and my constitutional rights to decide a material issue of law which had specifically been requested left to a juries purview as provided in D 2 & 3. May I have a day in court to put these issue before a jury? Because the puppet judges of Government serve only the corruption of their master. See We The People v. United States Government

  1.  This case was filed with a RiCO civil cause of action.
  2. This case was not brought under FTCA or U.S.C 5 Section 702.
  3. If Judicial review were to be performed then it was inappropriate to proceed barring the same requirements as demanded under the FTCA because as USC 5 702 States “A person suffering legal wrong because of agency action, or adversely affected or aggrieved by agency action within the meaning of a relevant statute, is entitled to judicial review thereof.”
  4. To quote Justice Scalia in National Law review 12-4-2014 “I doubt the Government’s pretensions to deference. They collide with the norm that legislatures, not executive officers, define crimes. When King James I tried to create new crimes by royal command, the judges responded “the King cannot create any offence by his prohibition or proclamation, which was not an offence before.” James I, however, did not have the benefit of Chevron With deference to agency interpretations of statutory provisions to which criminal prohibitions are attached, federal administrators can in effect create (and uncreate) new crimes at will, so long as they do not roam beyond ambiguities that the laws contain [internal citations omitted]. . . .”
  5. Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone said the juror “ is voting on the justice of the law according to his own conscience and convictions and not someone else’s. The law itself is on trial quite as much as the case which is to be decided.”
  6. “I consider trial by jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution,” a Virginia lawyer wrote around the same time. His name Thomas Jefferson.
  7. Justices Alito, Scalia, and Thomas write, in their concurrences in Perez, that judicial deference to agency interpretive rules cannot be squared with the constitutional structures of separation of powers, and checks and balances.
  8. And for the very reasons stated by Thomas Jefferson, Justice Harlan F. Stone, Alito, Scalia, and Thomas deference in civil and criminal trials is the jury’s purview and not the agencies or a judge.

Case #4:13-cv-00054 JLK RGB was upheld by the 4th Circuit court of appeals case 14=1480 and 14-1925 and denied cert by the Supreme court Petition 14-1051.

On April 14, 2015 I requested The President of the United States abide by his sworn duty to uphold the Constitution and the Laws of this nation under the Take care Clause 5 of Article 2 and I submitted my form SF-95 under the requirements of the FTCA. See Mr. President all thats necessary for the triumph of Government evil is for those in power to do nothingAlbert Einstiend World Destroyed

On November 9 2015 I filed suit in the Court of Federal Claims for breach of contract and a taking without just compensation. Because, Judge Jackson L. Kiser unlawfully converted the RICO cause of action and separated for his personal review the material question of law that belonged in the juries’ purview. Case # 1:15-cv-01344 EJD EGB See We The People v. United States Government

Cog Dis

On January 19, 2016 Because numerous Federal & State judges had ignored federal laws and my constitutional rights on numerous occasions I motioned for Judge Edward J. Damich of the Court of Federal Claims to state in writing: 1 he had taken the judicial oath of office 2 would adhere to that oath during proceedings 3 abide by the Judicial cannons of his office.

  1. Why if you took an oath of office to uphold the law and the constitution might you hesitate even a minute to affirm it?
  2. Why if you took an oath of office to uphold the law and the constitution might you hesitate for even a minute to affirm your intent to abide by that oath?
  3. Why if you took the oath of a judge would you hesitate to affirm your intent to abide by the canons of that office?

Surely an honest judge would have no problem with any of that?

Canon 1: A Judicial Employee Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary and of the Judicial Employee’s Office

A Federal Judge  must  honor an offer as an official of the United States Government he cannot decline acceptance by a private citizen the offer of Constitutional rights. Denying a request to affirm  his oath, intent to adhere to it, and his judicial canons, Judge Edward J.Damich  declined acceptance of the Governments offer to a private citizen. Common law says once an offer is accepted a contract is binding. “Contracts make the law – all law is contract.” Declining to attest, is  breach of contract under common law and constitutional intent of the United States.

The reason for asking judge Edward J. Damich to attest he took an oath of office and intends to abide by that oath of office and his judicial canons, is to ascertain beforehand, the honesty, fairness and integrity this total stranger “intends” to display during the course of the hearing.

Remember, this stranger holds enough power over Plaintiffs and has the potential to disrupt Plaintiffs life and remove their liberties. Which numerous Judges have already done to  Plaintiff(s) Furthermore, and of great importance is the role prior judicial breaches  of the laws, the oaths, and canons played in the proximate cause of the complaint at issue.

Plaintiffs had a due process right to know their going to be treated in the prescribed manner by this unknown stranger and getting access to the law, Plaintiffs are entitled haven given up some natural freedoms? Plaintiffs opted into being subject to the Constitution and allowing the Supreme Law to have [legitimate] control over them. “Contracts make the law – all law is contract.

“The absolute rights of man, considered as a free agent, endowed with discernment to know good from evil, and with power of choosing those measures which appear to him to be most desirable, are usually summed up in one general appellation, and denominated the natural liberty of mankind. This natural liberty consists properly in a power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, unless by the law of nature: being a right inherent in us by birth, and one of the gifts of God to man at his creation, when he endued him with the faculty of free will. But every man, when he enters into society, gives up a part of his natural liberty, as the price of so valuable a purchase; and, in consideration of receiving the advantages of mutual commerce, obliges himself to conform to those laws, which the community has thought proper to establish.” – William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England.

“The due administration of justice requires first that all citizens should have unhindered access to the constitutionally established courts of criminal or civil jurisdiction for the determination of disputes as their legal rights and liabilities; secondly, that they should be able to rely upon obtaining in the courts the arbitrament of a tribunal which is free from bias against any party and whose decision will be based upon those facts only that have been proved in evidence adduced before it in accordance with the procedure adopted in courts of law; and thirdly that, once the dispute has been submitted to a court of law, they should be able to rely upon there being no usurpation by any other person of the function of the court to decide according to law. Conduct which is calculated to prejudice any of these requirements or to undermine public confidence that they will be observed is contempt of court” – Lord Diplock in Att-Gen v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [1974]

Once laws are made it’s the job of the judge to listen to and make judgments when there are disputes and allegations of wrong doings. This position as you would expect requires the holder to be of impeccable character and hold the highest moral standards and unshakeable integrity. There can be no lesser qualifications for a position in society of such great importance and power.

You should ALWAYS get a positive answer from an honest judge, how could you not?  What do you think? 

In an ideal world no one would even dream of questioning a judges integrity. It would go without saying that if that man or woman took a solemn oath to perform and act in a certain way, there would be no way on Earth that that solemn vow would be welched on or forgotten when suited. Men and women who are honest develop a reputation for that honesty and so there is very little if any natural motivation to question that honesty.

For Judge Edward J. Damich to confirm his intention gives the people and Plaintiffs confidence in this complete stranger to act fairly, honestly and with integrity and to be TOTALLY IMPARTIAL His denial of the motion for said relief the antithesis.

This is a NORMAL request for someone to ask in a situation as alien to him as this and having a case based largely on Federal Judges failure to observe the same.

For judge Edward J. Damich to decline a request to confirm being bound by his oath did not foster confidence, judge Edward J. Damich would act as professional as one would expect, and so there was no trust in judge Edward J. Damich judicial abilities and integrity when the responsive pleading was written.

Plaintiffs have found judges lacking in honesty, fairness and integrity, a requirement demanded by their “noble” profession. It’s these judges that appear to have abandoned their oath and honor, and it’s these judges’ prior actions that demanded Plaintiffs ask Judge Edward J. Damich if he would be bound by the principles of his oath with the intention of getting a positive answer.

Consider the Words of Thomas Jefferson: “judges are as honest as other men, and not more so. They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps, Their power [is] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control.” SeeThomas Jefferson Explains Path to Oligarchy! William Jefferson Clinton Perfects It!                                                                        

If I was appointed to be a Justice by President William Jefferson Clinton and later was  assigned a case accusing President William Jefferson Clinton of establishing and operating a criminal unconstitutional enterprise waring against We The People I should I recuse myself on the grounds presiding over such a case might appear to lack independence or worse an intent to protect a criminal enterprise involved in treason. An enterprise accused of denying individuals the constitutional rights a judge has a  sworn  oath to uphold? See Thomas Jefferson Explains Path to Oligarchy! William Jefferson Clinton Perfects It! 

Canon 2: A Judicial Employee Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All Activities

Presiding over a case in which President William Jefferson Clinton who appointed you to the bench as a judge with a 15 year plus appointment is accused of establishing a criminal unconstitutional enterprise and you do not recuse yourself. I state for me unequivocally presents the  significant appearance of impropriety. What do you think ?   

February 4, 2016 Judge Edward J. Damich Denied a request to attest:

  1. he had taken the judicial oath of office,
  2. would adhere to that oath during proceedings,
  3. would abide by the Judicial cannons of his office.

Judge Edward J. Damich denial of attestation of  is calculated obstruction of justice 18 U.S.C 1505 and so, a common law contempt of court, a broken oath 28 U.S.C. 453 and, a common law breach of contract,  a violation of 28 U.S.C 455(a) and 18 U.S.C. 242! And quite plausibly 18 U.S.C. 1621 & 18 U.S.C 2382 42 U.S.C 1986

If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution, and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. Furthermore, since this Plaintiffs case involves treason judge Damich has chosen to War against We The People and to adhere to the enemies of We The People.

If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.

These are hardly what can be characterized as Judicial functions or the expectations society has on such a high office and an officer sworn to uphold the constitution under 28 U.S.C 453.

Judge Damich the Constitution of these united States of America is the supreme law of the land. No other law, rule, regulation or code including contract can supersede it, nor can your authority as a judge, or an imposter acting as a judge. You did not confirm your oath you violated it and you have violated 28 U.S.C. 455(a) you are an imposter, you are unlawful in the office, in violation of 18 U.S.C 912. You should have recused yourself and you should step down. You sir I contend are a traitor and should be tried for treason.

Failure to confirm your oath of office suggest judge Edward J. Damich does indeed intend to prejudice your the Plaintiffs  rights to equal access to justice. Consequently, I will no longer consider myself bound by the social contracts of law because, the U.S. GovernmentThe Pick Poem is in breach of its agency duties and has become a law breaker. I denounce as valid any control local, state, and federal governments have over my personal sovereignty. I no longer under my free will grant you any power and will resist with full and uninhibited force any attempt at control over my person in any manner whatsoever. Until such time as my constitutional rights are observed and justice served on the traitors.”

The rule of law requires that no one be above the law, not even the king, that the law has been defined before a controversy exists and that the punishment set for breaking the law. Prior to this controversy the rules were set in : Anatomy of a Criminal Threat Absent Malace

January 27, 2016 I contacted my congressional representative because the judge had not only not responded but  several items I believed should be on the courts docket had not been docketed. I requested, since the court of federal claims was an agent for congress my case become a petition for a congressional hearing on my allegations. See item C(2).

February 4, 2016 The response brief to the DOJ’s motion to dismiss under 12(b) was filed with the Court and at the same time the motion of January 19, 2016, appeared on the docket followed February  10, 2016, by other items the court should have long ago docketed.

February 11, 2016 I had a personal come to Jesus discussion with the office of my worthless  congressional representative Moron Griffith. I believe as the Executive and Judicial branches of Government are co conspirators in this treason on We The People it is Congresses duty to bring the traitors to justice. See C(2) & C(3).

February 13. 2016 News of this case was just to much for Antonin Scalia to bear!

Because:

A(3) The USDA/FSA has for decades used this criminal unconstitutional enterprise to inflict all manner of despotic tyranny, torture, and terrorism for all manner of destruction in the lives, livelihoods, health and causing all manner of family destruction in the lives of thousands of We The People.

B (3) Effectively, the Executive and Judicial branches of Government are acting in their own interest above the law waging war on We The People. What are the United States if not the embodied representation of We The People?

C. (1) “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them“ (We The People ? ), “or in adhering to their Enemies.” Enemies of (We The People)?

C. (2) “The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason” Is this then not the responsibility of the Court of Federal Claims?  They don’t think so. They have responded to this law suit precisely as predicted in.Any doesn’t mean Any Anymore!

Slide1

March 10, 2016 in a perfect example of a reasonless summary order Judge Edward J. Damich denied the Government, We The People had any intention in legislating this law to contract with a Plaintiff for  the prosecution of these criminals and denied the promise  presented in title 18 Chapter 96 Section 1964(c)  entitled plaintiffs to the compensatory damages the U.S Government promised. Attorney fees for my time and effort, Cost of brining the suit, and treble damages as incentive in contrast see the intent of this law as stated by the Supreme Court in:

Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates][107 S.Ct. 2759, 483 U.S. 143, 151 (1987)] : “RICO and the Clayton Act are designed to remedy economic injury by providing for the recovery of treble damages, costs, and attorney’s fees.[1] Both statutes bring to bear the pressure of “private attorneys general” on a serious national problem for which public prosecutorial resources are deemed inadequate; the mechanism chosen to reach the objective in both the Clayton Act and RICO is the carrot of treble damages. Moreover, both statutes aim to compensate the same type of injury; each requires that a plaintiff show injury “in his business or property by reason of” a violation”

It’s astonishing to discover the Federal Courts do not find a RICO enterprise operating from the Office of the President a serious national problem. But they’re going to do everything in their power to protect it from a jury. I can tell you from experience and I suspect the tens of thousands of farmers before me believe congress had every intent to contract with a private individuals to rid our Government of the Mafia style corruption it operates under.

While the court labeled the Opinion not for publication you can read it here as Item 13 opinion.Please feel free to review any of the other court filing documents you like. The Key Documents Chronologically  

America where should we go from here?

The Executive Branch of Government is operating criminally aided and abetted by the Federal Judiciary and the Court of Federal Claims as agent of Congress claims to have no authority to review the actions of  the Judiciary as it conspires with an Executive office against We The People.

Yes America the Treason within is perpetrated by members of the judiciary and the ABA of Liars.

Update 4-9-2016 Every American has a civic duty to watch this film: WHO STOLE THE AMERICAN DREAM I challenge you to discredit its facts. After you watch this film answer the questions. Who Started, What Professional/Organization were they in, When did it start, and Where did the war on the American dream began. Who’s running and controlling the war on the American Dream? Lawyers working with Bankers?  You should also watch this film as well The American Dream What Happened

If Congress refuses to assume power to hold these branches accountable for treason; they too, join in tyranny and oppression of We The People and We The People have a duty to freedom and our fore fathers to see the traitors, and those who aid and protect them hang in the fires of hell.

America should understand, I write this blog as a record for the world to see, just what a hypocritical nation the American Government has become. A nation touting its respect for justice, the rule of law, and for democracy while itself being a serious oligarchy run by the ABA engaged in despotic, tyranny,  oppression and extortion of We The People!

The US Government is completely responsible for the consequences of their criminal actors

cbjulian

Not a Pro Pro Se Per Se.

@blueridgespring

WordPress.blueridgesprings.com

blueridgesprings.com

Tom Vilsack Before Hispanic Caucus.

Tom Vilsack Before Hispanic Caucus.

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) together with the Farm Service Agency (FSA), the National Appeals Division (NAD), and multiple state agricultural mediation programs operate an organized racketeering enterprise, fraudulently masquerading as an administrative appeals process. This Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization (RICO) is designed to deny appellants their individual constitutional rights to Due Process and Equal Justice under supreme law while usurping the judicial system to hide incompetent administration of the people’s resources and manage legal risk for financial gain. Since this is Fraud on Farmers, it obviously has an impact on agricultural commerce.

This fraudulent unconstitutional illegal risk mitigation effort under guise of an administrative appeal process is a federal crime under title 18 chapter 96 sections 1961-1968.It cannot be squared with Governments obligation to the people to operate legally and within the law.

This enterprise protects employees of the USDA & FSA from accountability and responsibility for crimes committed on the very individuals their employed to serve, from responsibility for negligence in the mismanagement of the people’s resources, from negligent, fraudulent, and discriminatory acts in the performance of their jobs even from accountability for failing to preform, proclaimed required procedures.

This enterprise is designed to deny fair, impartial, legal, and constitutionally guaranteed judicial review. It is intentionally designed to abuse the judicial doctrine of Chevron deference, which the judiciary has come to abuse in the denial of individual civil rights by consenting to Governments usurpation of the Constitutions intentional separation of powers.

My lawsuit against the USDA RICO enterprise described above was protected by Superior U.S. Federal District Court Judge Jackson L. Kiser and the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals from a Jury trial and Denied cert by the of the United States Supreme Court. I believe Judge Kiser’s intent was to block the RICO charges to protect the enterprise from dissolution as allowed under RICO.

Today Secretary Tom Vilsack at 12:00 noon, Thursday, March 3rd, will come before the Congressional Hispanic Caucus to answer questions regarding the Hispanic & Women’s Civil Rights Claims process. Where Of 53,803 total discrimination claims submitted 22,163 (41%) were reviewed. Of these only 3,210 (14.4%) of the claims reviewed were approved — only 6% of the total claimants and most of these to women.

I ask you to consider the impact the RICO enterprise described above had on these appellants prior to their filing claims under this settlement. I assure you this enterprise took every opportunity to deny these appellants their constitutional rights to a fair and impartial hearing and that fact is not reflected in the Agencies case records.

I submit that an agency operating a RICO enterprise to avoid financial damages, accountability, and responsibility for the jobs their paid to perform has no business being allowed any involvement in the evaluation of these claims.

Remember, “There is no greater tyranny, than that which is perpetrated under the shield of law and in the name of justice” Montesquieu

The Small American Farmers of this country deserve a loud and demanding call from American Citizens to end this decades old Trojan horse war by the USDA on the backbone of this country.

Justice Louis Brandeis offered this view ‘”Decency, security and liberty alike demand that government officials shall be subjected to the rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen.” Racketeering is a Federal Crime!

“ In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously.”

Operating a RICO enterprise in violation of Federal Law and for denial of constitutional rights to Due Process is a violation of the Constitution that borders on treason.

“Our government is the potent, omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for the law; it invites every man to come a law unto himself. It invites anarchy. (United States v. Olmstead, 277 U.S. 438 (1928).”

Chris Julian

Not a Pro Pro Se per Se.

@blueridgespring

WordPress.blueridgesprings.com

We The People v. United States Government 1:15-CV-01344

We The People v. United States Government 1:15-CV-01344

As an agent for Congress the U.S. Court of  Federal Claims has a duty to protect the American people from Government abuses of power. Especially abuse of power by the executive branch engaged in criminal and unconstitutional activities for the depravation of constitutional rights protected by arbitrary, capricious, judicial abuses of power not in accordance with the law.

The Department of “In” Justice (DOJ) asks the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, to suppose the power of the judiciary is superior to that of the legislature.

The DOJ ask the U.S. Court of Federal Claims to accept on the pretense of a repugnancy and by violation of federal law Judge Jackson L. Kiser may substitute his own pleasure for the constitutional intentions of the legislature.

The DOJ ask the U.S. Court of Federal Claims to accept that Governments power is above that of the people and the supreme law of the land.

The DOJ ask the U.S. Court of Federal Claims to accept We The People are no longer in power but, that Government has usurped the United States for its own self interest and enrichment of its servants.

The U.S. Court of Federal Claims should look to the words of Abraham Lincoln “It is as much the duty of Government to render prompt justice against itself in favor of citizens, as it is to administer the same, between private individuals” Because, it is as much the duty of the Federal Court of Claims to render prompt justice against the “Judiciary” and “Executive” branches of Government, in favor of citizens as it is to administer the same between private individuals. Is the judiciary no longer a branch of the United States Government?

The U.S. Court of Federal Claims was founded under Article I., not Article III of the Constitution of the United States. Consequently, this court and its jurisdiction are representative agents of “We the People” through collective congressional representation. It is the function of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims to hold Government “Both” the Executive and Judicial branches of government accountable.

If the U.S. Court of Federal Claims finds for any reason it lacks capacity to hear this case, then they must refer it as a petition for congressional hearing. As an agent of Congress, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims must ensure that the legislative will of the people is enforced. Enlightened souls are opposed to Government operating illegal enterprises for the depravation of constitutional rights to absolve themselves of crimes, accountability, and responsibility, in the jobs they’re paid and have duties to perform.

For the record, frustration and displeasure with the Governments lying, judicial abuse, corruption, and criminal operations of the Executive offices is an extraordinary understatement. Plaintiffs are tried of Governments persistent attempts through pervasive and consistent lying, corruption, and contempt for the law and Constitution, to deny justice while continually trivializing and ignoring such grotesque corruption plaguing the American farms and farmers. Real frustration comes from having to deal with lame arguments by a Government continuing to insist on abusing power, believing people should simply accept as true persistent lies and fallacy under the pretense of justice, at the hands of judges who are but pawns of the same enterprise.

Congress may condone these traitorous acts, as they have obviously turned a continuous blind eye to this heinous, despotic, and criminal enterprise operating as a wolf in sheep’s clothing against civilians they’re paid to serve. The people may be blind and in the dark but, disinfecting light is coming. I would submit the corrupt government oppressors have continually underestimated the resolve, ingenuity, and persistence of Plaintiffs intent to see this enterprise eliminated. As Clint Eastwood would say go ahead, make my day! For decades USDA has operated this enterprise without accountability or responsibility. Never did they believe a farmer would discover their scam or pursue them through federal courts. In the next rounds any attempt to obstruct swift justice by jury trial will not be tolerated by the people; darkness is fading into light.

Congressmen like representative Steve Chabot first district of Ohio, Who is on the House Judiciary Committee, the House Committee on Small Business, The House subcommittee on Economic Growth, and the House Subcommittee on Investigations, Oversight and Regulations, are intimately aware of the Governments manner of family destruction in the lives of so many African American, Hispanic, and Female farmers.

However, this to is another Government cover up, a fraud on the farmers. While numerous diversities have suffered, so to have all small farmers at the hands of government, which hit small farmers with the force of a cataclysm as they waged an invisible and unreported war on small farmers. A war waged to support large corporate agribusiness, lawyers, judges, bankruptcy courts, financial institutions, and environmental objectives lining the pockets of elected officials.

A war waged through an unconstitutional, criminal, and illegal government run RICO enterprise supported by agencies at county, state, and federal levels to intimidate small farmers, giving them faulty information, denying them loans, after having made the wolf in sheep’s clothing the lender of last resort, and harassing them from their land. A Government run RICO enterprise taking land by bankrupting and foreclosing on small farms with no need for compensation.

A Government run RICO enterprise which has protected evil, criminal, recalcitrant agents of government,who never lost their employment and are granted rich retirements and benefits after haven stolen the land, the livelihood, the health, and causing all manner of family destruction in the lives of so many. Farmers fraudulently entrapped by government agents representing themselves as servants of the people when in reality they served a criminal self serving government and the financial coffers of the peoples representatives.

The U.S. Court of Federal Claims must use its Jurisdiction to ensure the peoples Constitutional rights are not subverted by any branch of government. Furthermore, The U.S. Court of Federal Claims must assure the American people they will no longer be subjects of tyranny and oppression at the hands of co-conspirators in Government.

The U.S. Court of Federal Claims must pause to recognize, Plaintiffs with standing who brought the civil (RICO) cause of action against an executive branch of government and its agents, were and are uniquely granted with the legislative authority to prosecute this criminal enterprise. The judiciaries’ actions to unlawfully, convert Plaintiffs suit blocked the only path available to the American people to end the criminal enterprise operating in and by an Executive branch of the U.S. Government. An enterprise aided and abetted by the unconstitutional granting of deference in a civil cause of action, aiding and abetting tyranny and oppression of We The People!

The USDA’s RICO enterprise operating from the Secretary of Agricultures office has unlawfully destroyed the lives of thousands of farmers assisted by the Judiciaries extraordinary bias in granting the agency deference to rewrite laws at will for their own protection. The U.S. Court of Federal Claims must act for justice (RCFC 1.), to assist in dismantling the despotic, oppressive tyranny which appears designed to allow Government the unlawful taking of personal property without due compensation. Designed to enforce big corporations who line the pockets of the people’s representation to the detriment and will of the American people.

The Judiciary is but one of three original branches of Government under the constitution, If this court “Congress” does not hold the Judiciary and Executive branches accountable to the law then they join in the oligarchy of kings above the law and submit the American people to slavery of despots.

The world should then know the U.S. Government is a fraud upon the people and its Constitutional form of Government has failed!

To We The People the U.S. Government is in breach of its Agency duties, and did breach its contractual offer, and promise to the American people to contract with a private citizen to assume the role of a prosecuting attorney with the carrots of inducement by legislative act for monetary compensatory damages, with further express congressional mandate of treble damages, attorneys fees and cost. The only purpose congress had in providing such inducements to a private citizen, was incentive for a private individual with standing to contract for the position of prosecutor and entice such a prosecutor to diligently investigate and pursue the elimination of criminal enterprises negatively affecting the channels of free enterprise and commerce in the publics best interest.Especially those operated using tax dollars to do so.

If Congress had no intent to be bound to the promise only a private citizens can pursue, why offer inducements? Why did they provide a private cause of action for the prosecution of criminal acts? Why does all prior precedent find this law applicable to government agencies?

Plaintiffs contracted for compensatory treble damages, attorney’s fees, and cost to assume the role of prosecutor, to prosecute a Government agency, because Congress understood the prosecutorial gap created by governments inability to prosecute itself.

In fact the U.S Government is defended in these cases by the DOJ, employees of the very government congress intended to empower a private citizen to prosecute. Furthermore, so to are the judges of Article III courts. Would it make sense for the DOJ the so-called Department of Justice to defend the U.S. government and prosecute the U.S. Government as both prosecution and defense council? The King who judges himself can do no wrong!

The founding fathers were well aware of the usurpation of power by government for tyranny. John Adams said, “Representative government and trial by jury are the heart and lungs of liberty.” Emphasis added. Thomas Jefferson wrote “I consider trial by jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution,” The founding fathers supported these statements in Article III clause 2 “The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury;” and in the seventh Amendment ”In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.” Remember also the words of former Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone “The juror is voting on the justice of the law according to his own conscience and convictions and not someone else’s. The law itself is on trial quite as much as the case which is to be decided”

Congress and all prior precedent in RICO found RICO applicable to government agencies and the forces that corrupt them. Congress provided RICO with a civil cause of action specifically to place judgment in the hands of a jury and not in the hands of the king that can do no wrong. Which is precisely the act of treason against the people committed by Superior Federal District Court Judge Jackson L. Kiser when he converted the RICO filing in and attempt to avoid a Jury trial in case 4:13-cv-00054-JLK. 

The U.S. Court of Federal Claims as agent for Congress is duty bound as the people’s representative government not to dismiss this case. They may find the Defendants guilty, bring the case as a petition before congressional hearing, or remand it for a jury trial.

The Court cannot without breach of their sworn duty to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the laws dismiss this case or convert it for Government to Judge itself. Such an act is adhering to the enemies of life liberty and justice, an act of war against the Constitution and We The People.

Plaintiffs based their claim on a promise by the United States Government. A promise the United States Government breached through unlawful, unconstitutional, criminal acts. Additionally, while the case was brought for plaintiffs benefit, it was is and always has been fueled by the thousands of small farmers whose lives have already been destroyed, and those that will be in the future unless this enterprise is cremated.

Plaintiffs RICO claim and the Conversion thereof to a claim for torts was not dismissed with prejudice. The torts were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under the rubric of the Federal Torts Claim Act. Forcing Plaintiffs to literally request from the RICO enterprise permission to sue them for being corrupt. Plaintiffs  forced to sign an agreement to accept a sum certain rather than the congressional mandated compensatory treble damages provided under RICO. Plaintiffs maintain the Constitutional right and standing to bring a new RICO claim against the USDA and a civic duty, at an appropriate time to pursue prosecution of this despicable display of unconstitutional government corruption.

A corrupted Secretary of Agricultures office running a criminal enterprise through corrupt federal and state agencies to usurp the constitutional rights of American citizens in order to avoid accountability and responsibility for crimes, or the duties they’re compensated to perform on behalf of the American people, is a travesty for justice of unfathomable consequences. For the U.S. Federal judiciary to aid these unconstitutional violations of the supreme law, with unconstitutional bias in favor of government agencies is a travesty of the United States Constitution, and the life liberty and justice for which it stands.

This combination has all too often led to the taking of private property without just compensation. So much so, it appears the U.S. Governments intent in establishing this criminal enterprise. A corrupt federal government protected by a corrupt federal judiciary is a tyrannous trespasser of the law and its people. Congress is duty bound to abolish it or otherwise “We The People” have every right, in fact a duty in the name of liberty and our sovereign rights to dismantle the government and our congressional representation by whatever means necessary.

The founding fathers were well aware from histories teachings Governments can and do become corrupted self-serving tyrannous despots. So enlightened the 1st and 2nd Amendments to the constitution were written for the very day. 1. Only through free speech could disinfecting light be shared among men, spreading the truth of a completely corrupted government. 2. Only by having arms in the hands of the people could liberty and freedom once again rise from the ashes of a government fallen to the weaknesses of the flesh.Jefferson & Tyranny & the 2nd amendment

In the words of Malcolm X ” His answer, “And I go for that. If you take up arms you’ll end it, but if you sit around and wait for the one who’s in power to make up his mind that he should end it, you’ll be waiting a long time.”

The U.S. Government DOJ defenses arguments have only wasted the Peoples and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims time and money, and justice in delaying. Every argument the Government portends to support its case is nothing less than fallacious attempts to prolong and avoid accountability and responsibility for their treasonous acts on the people and Constitution of the United States. It’s obvious that the Government is run by and thinks like lawyers in constant opposing battle over turf and never focused on the rights and needs of the people.

We The People need to understand this is not a partisan issue President Bill Clinton may have institutionalized the racket, but it was operating long before he took office. No, this operation took bipartisan support to instigate and I believe you can attribute the whole operation to the collusion of, for, and by lawyers.

 

This U.S. Court of Federal Claims should choose carefully a path to salvation. The path is narrow and sharper than the razors edge.

Chris Julian

Not a Pro Pro Se per Se.

@blueridgespring

WordPress.blueridgesprings.com

Oligarchy, Revolution, Judicial Reform Imagine Illuminating the World

Oligarchy, Revolution, Judicial Reform Imagine Illuminating the World

 

Many defend global warming is not real. Stop just a moment, ask yourself what if global warming is real and your very late with any attempt to slow it down?  What would you do If you knew global warming is real and its effects imminent ? What are the consequences, if global warming is real, and nothing is done about it, versus the consequences of it being a natural phenomenon or a hoax?

What if it’s so far along its impossible to slow down? Focus on what should be done, what could be done, to clean up the worlds pollution, rebuild and modernize infrastructure, better, faster, cleaner, utilize the technological advancements of our time to create a far better future focused on green energy, clean water, social and economic justice for all? What If?

How about world wide social changes for global UNBUTU ?  Social change for global awareness, social change for global basic income, social change for a global democratic socialist revolution. Global change for a global society on this one and only blue marble. ubuntu-an-anthropologist-proposed-a-game-to-the-kids-in-an-african-tribe-he-put-a-basket-of-fruit-near-a-tree-and-told-the-kids-that-the-first-one-to-find-the-fruits-would-win-them-all-w

Keep in mind money is merely a conceptual Idea theres nothing tangible or real about it outside your mind. Hoarding money for ones private use is nothing less than selfish ego. A billionaire does not need another billion nor do his heirs deserve to have so much given to so few when so many need so much.

Of all the species on this planet, of all the forms of social structure, what social structure has been the most prolific and successful for the longest period of time. Read 10 Frightening Facts You Probably Didn’t Know About ___.

As Robert Reich said if you like the current political system vote for Hillary she is well qualified to run the one we have, But, if you want the one we should have vote for Bernie Sanders. So If you think the current system is the best we can reasonably hope for.

Written “assuming” Dr Richard Cordero was referring to a letter I wrote to my Congressional Representative Morgan Griffith previously discussed in the earlier blog Nations Conscience Has Taken Leave of Court! When he wrote:

The realization of running the risk of killing the prospect for a political career with an above average annual salary of more than $150,000 for the sake of a Quixotic venture against Taller Than Windmill Judges has a lightening fast sobering effect…unless one had realized that from the outset.”

Dr. Richard Cordero Judicial Discipline Reform Advocate.

Well YES! A revolution is required to overcome the entrenched Taller Than Windmill cancer of corruption symptomatic of the oligarchy control over our government, society, and planet. Public realization “Education” and outrage at the TRUE reality is a requirement for energizing a movement of the next generation for Quixotic Change. The judiciary is but a symptom of the root problem, which you cannot begin to change, without a change in Governance by the People.

New Graph Design

Societies around the world are in great pain and peril from the Old boy establishments. The Planet itself, is seriously threatened, believe it or not. But, before your ego gets in the way of  your intellect making you an eqidiot please read The one thing you always know .                        Egidiot is like Donald Trump ego so large it gets in the way of his intellect making him say and do stupid idiot things.  

The next generation must move swiftly, with visionary, innovative, disruptive, and exceedingly idealistic revolution, to overcome the globally corrupted stagnant foundations of societal obstruction, and effect the unfathomable practical change reality demands. Millennia’s must become electrified to police injustice and move mountains!

The millennial generation must take the red pill seize the day and destroy the matrix a brutal awakening to the Truth must occur!

Change is inevitable rapid change is chaos. As ugly and violeCog Disnt as that may be, future generations depend on it. Because the establishment and transfixed sheep of the matrix are trapped in a box by Cognitive Dissonance! Those who believe can, or otherwise won’t.

“You have to start with the truth. The truth is the only way that we can get anywhere. Because any decision-making that is based upon lies or ignorance can’t lead to a good Conclusion.” 

Julian Assange

It is not whether you win or loose in court(s) its how you play the game. Truth lives in the past, lies in the future. Those who live the truth die with Honor those who live the “to” lie die without!

Truth is the light and the way. Shine it on! Keep, keep, keep shining, only with light can we electrify the police “We The People” to disinfect the pollution destroying society, the planet, and ultimately the human race.

“The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in the insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding.”

“Experience teaches us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government’s purposes are beneficent.”

“Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done.”

“The most important political office is that of the private citizen.”

“We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.”

“If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.”

“In the frank expression of conflicting opinions lies the greatest promise of wisdom in governmental action.”

“If we would guide by the light of reason we must let our minds be bold.”

“Fear of serious injury alone cannot justify oppression of free speech and assembly. Men feared witches and burnt women. It is the function of speech to free men from the bondage of irrational fears.”

“Publicity is justly commended as a remedy for social and industrial diseases. Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman.”

“Our government… teaches the whole people by its example. If the government becomes the lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.”

Justice Louis D. Brandeis – The Peoples Lawyer

Government & the Judiciary are in breach of contract and their agency duty.Light must be shown on the Truth and nothing but the Truth.

Let anarchy begin.

Chris Julian

Not a Pro Pro Se per Se.

@blueridgespring

WordPress.blueridgesprings.com

Thomas Jefferson Explains Path to Oligarchy! William Jefferson Clinton Perfects It!

Thomas Jefferson Explains Path to Oligarchy! William Jefferson Clinton Perfects It!

May 1788 in Federalist No. 78 Alexander Hamilton wrote :

“A Constitution, is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law.” ”The constitution ought to be preferred to the statute, the intention of the people to the intention of their agents.”

”Nor does this conclusion by any means suppose a superiority of the judicial to the legislative power. It only supposes that the power of the people is superior to both; and that where the will of the legislature, declared in its statutes, stands in opposition to that of the people, declared in the Constitution, the judges ought to be governed by the latter rather than the former. They ought to regulate their decisions by the fundamental laws, rather than by those, which are not fundamental. [Emphasis added]“

It can be of no weight to say that the courts, on the pretense of a repugnancy, may substitute their own pleasure to the constitutional intentions of the legislature. This might as well happen in the case of two contradictory statutes; or it might as well happen in every adjudication upon any single statute. The courts must declare the sense of the law; and if they should be disposed to exercise WILL instead of JUDGMENT, the consequence would equally be the substitution of their pleasure to that of the legislative body. The observation, if it prove any thing, would prove that there ought to be no judges distinct from that body.” [Emphasis added]

See [Exhibit 2].Federalist No. 78 Alexander Hamilton

Thomas Jefferson in a letter to William Jarvis September 28th 1820 about the constitution wrote:

“I feel an urgency to note what I deem an error in it, the more requiring notice, as your opinion is strengthened by that of many others. You seem in pages 84 and 148, to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so. They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps, Their power [is] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves.” [Emphasis added]

See [Exhibit 3].Excerpt from the writings of Thomas Jefferson.

Stop here and consider for a minute that at the time of Jeffersons letter the average life expectancy was a ripe old age of 37. Additionally, the case of Marbury v. Madison had established  precedent

“The solution he chose has properly been termed a tour de force. In one stroke, Marshall managed to establish the power of the court as the ultimate arbiter of the Constitution, to chastise the Jefferson administration for its failure to obey the law, and to avoid having the court’s authority challenged by the administration.”

From 1789 until 1855 all monetary claims based upon a congressional statute, an executive branch regulation, or a contract with the United States Government were handled by petitions to Congress.

In 1855 (10 Stat. 612) Congress established the Court of Claims to relieve its own workload. In 1861 at President Abraham Lincoln’s insistence congress granted the court of claims the essential judicial power to render final judgments in response to President Lincoln’s’ insistence in his annual message to congress in 1861 that

“ It is as much the duty of Government to render prompt justice against itself, in favor of citizens, as it is to administer the same, between private individuals”

See history on the Court of Federal Claims website.

The Administrative Procedures Act was born in a contentious political environment between 1933 and 1946 as detailed in the 1946 U.S. House of Representatives report detailing a “painstaking and detailed study and drafting” Based on one study, President Roosevelt commented that the practice of creating administrative agencies with the authority to perform both legislative and judicial work

“threatens to develop a fourth branch of government for which there is no sanction in the Constitution

In 1994 while the USDA was besieged with Civil and Criminal allegations President William Jefferson Clinton signed into law the Department of Agriculture Reorganization act of 1994. Subsequently, Mike Epsy then Secretary of Agriculture promulgated into law the National Appeals Divisions, See Title 7 Part 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The Secretary then promulgated into law that the Federal Rules of Evidence shall not apply to proceedings under the National Appeals Division. See Title 7 CFR 11.4(b). 

Update – 3-17-2016- It’s important to note here that at the time President Obama’s Vice President Joe Biden was head of the Senate Judiciary committee. President William Jefferson Clinton’s Vice President Al Gore an environmental activist. Senator Joe Biden and Senator Barrack Obama cosponsored the Piggford v. Glickman settlements. If you don’t see the connections your blind! The good ole boy network of the ABA is at work rapping, robbing, and destroying the lives of small farmers by usurpation of the Constitution and the Judiciary.  After this legislations enactment  Judge Edward J. Damich was appointed to the Bench by William Jefferson Clinton in 1998 to the  Intellectual Property Counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee. May he have assisted in the legal construction of this criminal enterprise? See :Integrity & Independence in the Federal Judiciary ?

The Secretary of Agriculture is a Cabinet Member reporting directly to the President of the United States, which at that time was notably President William Jefferson Clinton. A President I might add who was a lawyer himself and was prolific at getting Federal, State, Appellate, and Supreme Court Justices into seats on the bench.

At this point the Secretary of Agriculture, reporting directly to the President had the United States Department of Agriculture USDA, and the NAD under his direct control  having eliminated the Federal Rules of Evidence.

Now you have an Executive Branch of the US Government with the power of all three branches of Government! Thomas Jefferson is rolling over!

President William Jefferson Clinton with Executive control of the Department of Agriculture. The USDA an Agency with administrative ability to promulgate into law under the code of federal regulations with the same force of law as statutes, and the National Appeals Division (NAD) also a division of the Department of Agriculture performing the Administrative Judicial functions. Where the Federal Judiciary will grant the USDA Chevron Bias to rewrite the laws to support NAD rulings. 

DSRGJ4EU8AA0H_C (1)

The only check on their power citizens now have over the department of Agriculture is Judicial review in Federal Court.

The Judiciary had at the time already begun exploiting precedent regarding  administrative agencies giving them extraordinary powers to interpret their own rules with Auer and Chevron Deference!

America has an Executive branch with the powers of the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches and more disturbing, the Judiciary on review granting them the power to simply rewrite law to avoid accountability or responsibility for their lack of compliance with the laws they promulgated. Has the Judiciary and Executive branch of government become co conspirators?

For anyone following along understand USDA administrative procedures under NAD are written and designed for these two goals. The first is to eliminate any appearance of financial damages with deference. The second is to ensure any criminal complaint is kept out of the proceedings leaving the appellant to pursue court action under the FTCA. Having eliminated the financial damages with deference the court will look the other way claiming no harm “financial harm” no foul. As if the crimes played no role in the whole scam.

This is simply an intentional usurpation of the United States constitutional segregation of power! It is an unconstitutional act of treason. This is the Nations Food Supply, Massive Farm Loan Programs, Food Safety Inspections, Food Nutrition Services, the Nations National Forest and Parks, controlled by an Executive branch with unrestrained power! Has congress allowed such for other Agencies of Government?

Supreme Court Justices Alito, Scalia, and Thomas write, in their recent concurrences in Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association No. 13-1041 Argued December 1, 2014—Decided March 9, 2015 that

judicial deference to agency interpretive rules cannot be squared with the constitutional structures of separation of powers, and checks and balances.”[Emphasis added]

Justice Thomas in particular provided a thorough and compelling review of the reasons why the Constitution separates powers between the three branches, and the evils that come from undivided government power.

Since the passage of the Agriculture Reorganization Act, NAFTA an signing of U.N. Agenda 21, all under William Jefferson Clinton, over 2 million small farmers have been displaced or bankrupted. Tom Vilisack of the USDA recently bragged farmers have declined by 22 million and farm land reduced by 23%. see Full Committee Public Hearing on State of the Rural Economy.2-24-2016.

Jefferson’s letter to William Jarvis in 1820 was prophetically spot on. The Judiciaries dangerous power coupled with passions for party, power, and privilege of their corps has erected and conceded us all to the hands of a single tribunal, turning them into despots placing We The People under the despotism of an oligarchy.

And I believe the true oligarchy is none other than the Fraternal order of lawyers > Judges and legislators in conjunction with their placement in Executive offices. I suggest you read my post

While a left leaning liberal, I Cannot Support Hillary 

Bernie Sanders has said after more than 25 years in office our Government is corrupt and powered by the influences of money and greed. Former President Jimmy Carter, as fine a man as I know has said our Government is no longer a Democracy but an Oligarchy. Jimmy Carter: The U.S. Is an “Oligarchy With Unlimited Political Bribery”

This country is seriously in need of a revolution which takes back our Government from the power of greed and the fraternal order of lawyers. We need to vote in a President, Congress, and Senate with few lawyers. Some would say I’m guilty of profiling lawyers. But, the facts speak for themselves, You want to be respected even honored you need to be honest, honorable, transparent, and remove the secrecy from behind closed doors. You need to be held accountable and responsible especially where your poking your hands in the publics interest.

You won’t respect? Earn it!

Slide1Because the rules don’t require it Judge Edward J. Damich Denies a request to affirm he has taken the oath of office and intends to abide by it. I never saw him take that oath. Given 4 Federal judges and 2 State Judges have not  followed the law in my legal battles with the U.S. Government. I expect the judge to affirm his intention to abide by the law upfront I want a promise of due process before they steal more of my life.

This is not in your favor. By Order of Judge Edward J. Damich.Note: Judge Damich was appointed to the bench by none other than William Jefferson Clinton.

Most of this information was part of my reply brief to the Governments Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12b. I believe Judge Damich should recuse himself. What do you think?

Here is an interesting Federal Law 18 U.S.C.2382

Update – 2-12-2016 – Federal, State, District, and National courts are not and have not been abiding by federal law. Our government is operating criminal racketeering operation and the media will not report it. I believe they are now after me I will not wind up like Andrew Brietbart. If approached by law enforcement I will not go like the quarry slave at night sustained and soothed by unfaltering trust. Law enforcement should be after the real criminals the corrupt lawyers, legislators, running our government and our courts.

Update – 2-19-2016 – Rudy Arredondo posted enlightening information on the Hispanic & Women Farmers & Ranchers Settlement Facebook page today. I have created this PDF version for your review and information.Hispanic & Women Farmer’s & Ranchers Settlement Claimants Group

Update – 2-21-2016 – New Clear Vision a Land without Farmers

Update – 2-21-2016- BFAA President Gary Grants website interesting read on the subject.

(Irony)

(linked documentation)

Chris Julian

Not a Pro Pro Se per Se.

@blueridgespring

WordPress.blueridgesprings.com

 

The Nations Conscience Has Taken Leave of Court !

The Nations Conscience Has Taken Leave of Court !

Given the current political environment I liked having my last post on the front page. However, many nuance complexities in my legal battle with the U.S. Government have occurred which I want to share. In other words I have no shortage of topics to write about. In some ways there all related to this journey.

Yesterday I mailed my response to the U.S. governments 12(b) motions to dismiss my case. There several pages of history and commentary in that filing relevant, not only to my case but, the state of the Nation, Judiciary, Government, my last blog post, and actually so many relevancies I simply can’t list them all. I intend to blog the history, and commentary in relative short order once, I have confirmation its in the hands of the clerk of the Federal Court of Claims.

I wrote in an earlier blog about my expectations of the Federal Courts response to filing of that case in Any Doesn’t Mean Any Anymore.  Waiting on confirmation; because, the only motions I filed in this case subsequent, to filing of the complaint have not been docketed. In fact several documents you would expect docketed in this case have not shown on the docket. Examples of which  include the Department of Justice attorney notice of appearance, a ruling from the judge on a request to proceed in forma pauperis and since i’m a pro se litigant, i’m under the impression a Roseboro notice should have been issued although, perhaps the rules in this court are not the same as the federal district courts?

The last two motions I presented to the court, mailed January 12, 2016, were a motion for presiding judge Edward J. Damich and the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Judge Eric G. Bruggink to provide affirmations and attest they had taken the U.S. Constitutions Oath of Office and regarding case 15-1344c they intended to abide by their oaths and the judicial cannons of office. To date neither of these motions or a response has been docketed. I made these motions for a number of reasons, its easy to see though, how a Senior judge might find the request offensive.

All this is interesting and bears significance and relation to other events. See, I began to suspect very early on after filing my first complaint, events occurring with the court were not kosher. In fact, I started this blog when I felt it had gone past just being my imagination. See the first blogpost from November 19, 2013 Capitalism, Democracy, Justice, and Civil Rights  written just 2 months after filing the first complaint. That post talks about filing a complaint against judge Jackson L. Kiser and how the Federal Judicial system is not open to complaints or criticism. Prior to this, I had blogged a little on the journey through the Administrative appeals process with the USDA on my web site Blueridgesprings.com/blog  I needed a better blogging platform, and if I could afford it today I’d pay the $99.00 to upgrade this one.

I posted a my discourse a number of times on the blog after that about my contentions the Federal District Court of Virginia Western Division was corruptly handling my case. I have on multiple occasions referred in motions to the court of Judge Jackson L. Kisers Memorandum Opinion issued March 24, 2014 as filled with deceit, deception, intentional misrepresentations, and dabbled with lies. Furthermore, I told the appellate court it reads entirely as though its written by attorneys for the defense. When you sue a branch of the U.S.Government for racketeering and get this response from a Federal Court Judge, you can only believe their part of the racket which, my research had already suggested.

Knowing the court had denied any opportunity to amend the complaint. Feeling literally raped by the Government, Judicially abused, and simply astounded by a federal court judge justifying opinions with outright lies, mis representation, and even crafting an alibi for criminal acts of Government employees, knowing, I would not have a chance at justice in this court.  I was free to motion for sanctions and no longer concerned with jeopardizing the case. I filed a motion with the court to sanction the attorney for the Virginia Department of Justice who early on failed to follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. I had blogged about this in Legal Conundrum by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2)(e)  

When I responded to the attorneys reply brief,  I was working on filing a brief for an  interlocutory appeal  see [Exhibit 5] with the 4th circuit court of appeals, and hoped this case was going to take a very different course, I also expected the motion for sanctions to get the very same prejudicial treatment, every other filing had received. Consequently, I concluded my reply brief  with a statement of fact not unlike that  expressed numerous times throughout history.See the blog post Response to Reply for Sanctions [ECF N.o. 60] and connect this with the quotes of Thomas Jefferson in my next blog post.tyranny-montesquieu

CONCLUSION

A Corrupt Federal Agency aided and abetted by a Corrupt Federal Court is a travesty of justice for American Democracy an Insult to the U.S. Judicial system, to the constitution of the United States of America, and to Life, Liberty, and Justice for all. It results in tyranny, oppression, and absolute despotism of the people, justifying completely and succinctly the second amendment to the constitution of the United States. There is no greater criminal than the criminal that sits on the bench robbing America of its foundations.

Its important for reasons never disclosed, you note the filing date of this reply is important. This reply brief was docketed on June 6, 2014. The Interlocutory appeal brief to the 4th Circuit court of appeals was mailed on June 11, 2014 and not docketed by the court of appeals until June 16, 2014. However, the U.S. Department of Justice  in Roanoke VA. received a copy of the interlocutory appeal brief on June 12, 2014.  On June 13, 2014 Judge Jackson L. Kiser docketed his Show Cause Order   blog post Judge Jackson L. Kiser sends U.S, Marshall with comments on my Blog.

Why are the dates so important? Well, if you read the show cause order, Judge Kiser states:

“[ECF No. 60]In that filing, they made several scurrilous and wholly unsubstantiated allegations about this Court, including accusing the Court of intentionally waiting to set Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss for hearing,1 and asserting that there is evidence of “ex parte communications.” Moreover, Plaintiffs accuse me of being a criminal, and accuse this Court of corruption:”

“1 In the Pretrial Order filed in this case on January 15, 2014, the parties were instructed that it is their responsibility to set motions for a hearing. (See Pretrial Order ¶ 5, Jan. 15, 2014 [ECF No. 32] (“It shall be the obligation of the moving party to bring the motion on for hearing by notice.”).) Absent extenuating circumstances, the Court does not set hearings for the parties sua sponte.”

Lets discuss the first Paragraph in order of statement.

  1. “intentionally waiting to set Defendants Motions to Dismiss for hearing.” the foot note 1 is accurate however, as was stated in the show cause hearing, The Attorney general for the state of Virginia was the movant and unless someone has done something shady the docket should reflect that the Attorney never submitted a motion for  a hearing. In fact the clerk of court at the judges direction scheduled one hearing for everything after the time to motion had already lapsed.
  2. “asserting that there is evidence of “ex parte communications”” I have yet to disclose the evidence of this to anyone and no one has asked me to either but, I believe I can prove that statement and I want you to consider this. The [ECF N.o 60 was docketed June 6, 2014. The DOJ of Roanoke got a copy of the Appellate appeal brief  on June 12, 2014 USPS mail tracking and then judge Kiser posted his show cause order on June 13, 2014 which was mysteriously followed by the appellate court not receiving the appeal brief until June 16 2014. USPS mail tracking coincidentally, the same time as the Virginia Attorney Generals office USPS mail tracking Its important to note here too, the appellate brief details many of these scurrilous and criminal acts as well as providing a more in depth look at the RICO allegations. see [Exhibit 5] from above.
  3.  I told you when I posted the blog Judge Jackson L. Kiser sends U.S.    Marshall with comments on my Blog to take a very close look at what the reply brief actually said. I have not discussed this before now except in the show cause hearing which the transcripts should reflect. I asked Judge Jackson L Kiser if he could show me where in that statement he found his name? Do you see it? Me either because it’s not there.  I asked Judge Jackson L. Kiser if he saw any mention of the Federal District Court of Virginia Western District in the statement. Do you see it? Me either because it’s not there. The statement was written at that very time, not to specify any particular judge or court. Just a statement of fact! So Judge Kiser you assumed the statement was about you and your court. I asked him in the hearing it thats how he ran his court based on his personal assumptions. I said I thought Federal Courts worked off of facts to determine the truth.

Now look at the print out of activity on Blueridgesprings.com   and WordPress.blueridgesprings.com  from June 10 – June 16. Yes, this may be circumstantial evidence but, someone knows the truth and with a little discovery its possible to know a lot more about the truth.

I tell you this. When I first filed the action I kept a lot of known factual information and evidence to myself. A lot of that came out in fits and spurts as the opportunity for discovery was continually moved  out of reach. To this day I’m still holding evidence of my RICO allegations I have not exposed. I’m not sure whether I provided to much information to start or not enough. I just figured in the beginning it would be a little like poker. Never let them know more than they need to know about the hand you’re holding. I have explained my belief about what you know for sure in my blog Do you know the one thing, The one thing you always know?

Unless I have some kind of substantial evidence in hand, I don’t like to make accusations about it. I believe the transcripts of the first hearing in my case were not accurate. Why, well certain statements and actions by people are sometimes very telling and stick with you especially if there highly important to you. There were 3 things, I believe were said in that hearing which are simply not in the transcript. I can’t prove it unless it was recorded but, the court reporters told me Judge Jackson L. Kiser would have to approve any changes and I would have to take it up with him. Go figure!

After the show cause order, I remember very well being threatened by Judge Kiser he would no longer allow my motions to be docketed. Interestingly enough, thats how the Federal District Court of Claims is operating. Discussed supra as they say. See paragraph 4.

I told Judge Kiser in the last hearing I had before him. He was a public official just like the rest of the defendants. The entire case was about accountability, responsibility and as a public official he was no different. Lawyers, Prosecutors, District Attorneys, Attorney Generals, The Department of Justice, they all have real conflicts of interest calling out a Federal Judge. Even congress looks bad when someone appointed to office, and confirmed by congress is guilty of criminal acts. I understood when I filed this suit that was precisely why RICO provided private attorney general status. But, if the courts wish to ignore the law were a lawless nation. I laud Judge Kiser for implying my 1st amendment rights do not apply to filings on a government owned system. The Judiciary simply wants no one holding them accountable and wants everyone to simply accept what they say is – is. Like Bill Clinton said depends on what the meaning of is – is.

On Several occasions beginning January 27 th I emailed Congressman Morgan F. Griffith a letter stating that two Federal Judges in the Federal District court of Claims were not docketing motions related to this RICO case. A case I had discussed with him previously. I sent this letter through his congressional website on January 31, 2016 and informing him I had asked for these judges to confirm their oaths of office and stated. If a Federal Judge is not willing to affirm his oath, and his intent to abide by that oath, he is no longer fit for duty, and I expected congress to fulfill its duty and accept my petition for a congressional hearing. As of this writing I have not received any response from Congressman Moran F. Griffith. I did copy the DOJ attorney in this case with that  communication. A copy of that letter can be seen here: Congressional Representative Morgan Griffith 

Update 2-12-2016 The Office of Congressman Moron Griffith called on 2-11-2016. A young woman on the line. I can’t help but wonder if it was the Attorney for the DOJ. You can not underestimate the willingness of everyone I have encountered in government to just straight out lie. Note that it took approximately 2 weeks for a response when every other previous time I was contacted within days. The local sheriffs office has started calling and i suspect at the congressman request. In the bigger picture its important to note Moron has a Washington and Lee JD, There seems to be quite the contingent of such grads in the circles of VA judicial and legislative corruption.

Update 2-4-2016 – Judge Edward Damich has issued his response to the motion requesting he make a written affirmation of his oath of office. He declined to do so. Stating:

“There is no provision in the Rules of the United States Court of Federal claims that calls for such acknowledgement.”

My response :  I consider his statement as reserving the right to proceed in violation of his oath. I find that unacceptable, If you want to be called your Honor you must first earn the title. Given my experience with Judge Jackson L. Kiser and members of the 4th CA I will no longer accept as true a judge has honor he will have to demonstrate it.  It would be a waste my time to proceed on such an endeavor. It’s a violation of Rule 1. It’s unjust to expect a plaintiff to proceed an action in which the judge reserves the right to disparage his oath of office. By declining, the judge is declining to extend to plaintiffs the constitutional promise of due process.   By Order of Judge Edward J. Damich 

Furthermore, my understanding was you could motion a judge for anything related to a case. There was no reason with such a motion to state  grounds for its blatantly  understood from the relief sought.

Christopher Julian

Not a Pro Pro-Se Per se.

@blueridgespring

WordPress.blueridgesprings.com

While a left leaning liberal, I Will Not Support Hillary!

While a left leaning liberal, I Will Not Support Hillary!

‪    I cannot support Hillary Clinton for President and here is why. President Bill Clinton signed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). See NAFTA at 20 Additionally, he signed UN Agenda 21 agreement. See Agenda 21 and President Clinton signed the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994. See William J. Clinton Statement.  Since NAFTA almost 2 million small farmers have been displaced. Agenda 21 goals without the people’s knowledge advocated  green growth, smart growth, sustainable, and save the planet plans limiting the use and ownership of private property, and, in some cases, leading to confiscation of property and return to wilderness.  Agenda 21 proposes the concentration of people away from rural areas and into cities. Is this why so many farmers have been wiped out by the USDA and NAFTA? I’m all for Green but their better ways to do it than despotic tyranny and oppression of small and often poor farmers. Watch the Story of Martha Boneta. The circumstances surrounding her story and mine have a great many similarities.  Farming in Fear 

Under President Clinton, Dan Glickman became secretary of agriculture in 1995 and settled the class action discrimination suit of Pickford v. Glickman in 1999. Mike Espy in 1994 his last and only year as Secretary also a  lawyer  promulgated into law the National Appeals Division (NAD) of the USDA. He followed the establishment by promulgating into law that NAD would not adhere to the federal rules of evidence. He was then replaced by Dan Glickman. Was the reorganization act, the creation of NAD, the replacement of Espy a conspiracy to protect the USDA from legal liabilities, as they used USDA farm loans to gobble up land to support Agenda 21 and NFTA objectives at the expense of Small American Farmers? Why have so many small farmers disappeared while mega farms grew and moved out of the country?

Stop for just a minute and ask yourself these questions. Who gets involved in helping farmers with Government Administrative appeals? Who beneifits with a farmer going bankrupt? Who benefits in the Farmers loss of their farm land? Think maybe lawyers, courts, judges etc?

President Clinton and Dan Glickman both lawyers put into place what I allege is an unconstitutional racketeering enterprise designed to steal the constitutional rights of farmers and protect USDA associates from accountability or responsibility for criminal acts. This racket is responsible for thousands of acts of judicial abuse and denial of civil rights. A Racketeering enterprise which I allege the Federal courts aided and abetted illegally and unconstitutionally to deny my lawsuit for racketeering and avoid a trial by jury in federal court.  A racket the Federal Courts have aided for decades by granting unconstitutional deference to USDA agencies.

The head of this enterprise is the current Secretary of Agriculture  Tom Villisack who reports directly to the President. Think about these facts. The Secretary of Agriculture is operating a racketeering enterprise in violation of Federal Law and in violation of Governments constitutional obligation to operate legally and within the law and he or she reports directly to the President of the United States. Does that imply the President of the United States is actually the head of a criminal enterprise protected by immunity and seemingly protected and assisted by the Federal Judiciary? How can that possibly square with the Presidents sworn duty to uphold the law and the constitution?

Please understand such an enterprise is protected from prosecution by anyone other than a private citizen with standing. To my knowledge I’m the only individual that has ever sought remedy of this in Federal Court through a RICO civil cause of action. Please refer to my postings on this blog blueridgesprings.wordpress.com for more on these racketeering allegations. Follow along as the story continues to unfold. Be sure you look at the Youtube video of Andrew Breitbart on  Piggford at CPAC. Then know Andrew  died in his forties of an apparent heart attack surrounded by questionable circumstances. Here is a link to that video > Breitbart on Piggford at CPAC

Then read this Seattle Times / Los Angels times  article on Piggford’s ‬experience after winning that suit for discrimination against African American farmers. Farmer who sued USDA and won now grappling with IRS. I suggest that we all take pause in knowing that the Women and Hispanic farmers settlement closed and while there were 53,803 people who applied. They only approved 2,504 women, and 706 Hispanics. That is less than 6% of the claimants. Based on my knowledge of the USDA racketeering enterprise, I suspect the numbers should be much higher likely even 100%. Those denied a settlement are attempting to band together on Facebook and  heres a link to that group> Hispanic & Women Farmer’s and Ranchers Settlement Claimants Group

You can read about Hispanic farmers plight here Hispanic Farmers Fight to Sue USDA. You can read about new claims from   Alabama Black Farmers Sue USDA.  You can read about the discrimination suit of White Farmers at White Farmers Suing USDA/FSA. You can look at the history of discrimination claims against the USDA at History of Discrimination claims. (Note the White Farmers Suit was dismissed as White farmers cannot be discriminated against under existing laws.) I would suggest after reading these you read Breitbart’s Piggford Report: Distortions and Shady Sourcing. Then you can read about Andrews report being vindicated Better Late Than Never New York Times Confirms Andrew.

I’m prepared to go to court and make my case before a jury, that in fact the USDA is operating a racketeering enterprise. But will the Federal courts ever allow it? The more I learn and find out about this operation it leads me to believe the USDA’s Farm Loan Program is actually a vehicle to launder under the table payoffs. There is no better way in todays environment to hide such payoffs than by making payments to principle or rolling over a mortgage loan hidden on a Government loan servicing system. Making mortgage payments is a common way to conceal bribes. How many congressman and Senators own or operate a farm? How involved is Monsanto in farming? How involved are other major companies in the commerce of Agriculture? How many former Government officials end up working for these firms or vise versa? How many legislators actually have USDA mortgages?  How many legislators directly or indirectly receive farm subsidies? For a general idea on the last question read Farm Subsidies Paid to the Members of the 112th Congress It would also be nice to know this on the Senate. You can see more on our legislators in Taxpayers Gave 15 Members of Congress 238K in Farm Subsidies.   Including Tom Villisack.  How many Judges have farming operations would also be a great question.

Subsidies

If you read through these links you will find articles by, Delta Farm Press, Ebony Magazine, Seattle Times, La Times, NY Times, Washington post. I have yet to have my story told in the media. I wonder where is the outrage over our Government operating a criminal enterprise to the determent, destruction, and despotic torture of its citizens? Where Mr. President is the Justice? I cannot conceive of anything that undermines the integrity of our nation more than the truth the U.S. Government is criminally operating against American Citizens aided by Federal courts ignoring the law and the constitution while destroying the foundations of this country.

If you read Breitbart’s Piggford Report in its entirety it implicates President Clinton, Vice President Al Gore, and President Barack Obama. Today, I was made aware of Hillary’s plans for rural America. You can read them at Hillary Clintons’s Plan for a Vibrant Rural America  However, if you read everything here I suggest you take a highly skeptical view of  Hillary’s plan and wonder if its anything more than an attempt to buy votes from rural America or even something else more sinister. Its no secret FSA, NAD, USDA and the Federal Judiciary has used their racket to terrorize my family and I now since 2012.

Update 2-25-2016 Take a close look at this video Hillary will say whatever she thinks is the right message to get elected. Why does she want it so bad? Hillary Clinton in Black History.

Lets not forget President Clinton also signed into law the repeal of Glass Steagall, which likely  was the root cause of the financial collapse, and subsequently Dodd Frank, and consequently, the destruction of my life’s work. Therefore, I would have to say President Clinton’s presidency killed the American dream for my family and I.See What is Glass Steagall. 

On a slightly different note  my journey through the court system has educated me to the nationwide epidemic in Judicial corruption. I have petitioned the White House to reform the Judiciary as demanded by Article 2 Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States. Please take time to sign this petition. Petition Link and here is why: Update 1-18-2016 Petition killed.Petition

Look at those numbers and then consider:

1 in every 110 people in the U.S. is a convicted Felon.

As of May 2012, a total of 3,294 individuals had been appointed to federal judgeships.

How many Federal Judges have there been in the last 225 years?

Some how their average is extrodinarly better than the countries human average?

You can read the complete text of Dr Richard Cordero’s analysis at this link: Exposing Judges Unaccountability and Consequent Riskless Wrongdoing. This is an issue of grave national importance and needs to be a topic on the platform of every Presidential Candidate. However, that will not happen unless the publics heart begins to beat to the tune of reform/revolution.  Also you can tune in Tuesday-Thursday from 4 – 7 on twigscaferadio.com  for Jasikoff & Friends, Sanity Check,and Justice served to hear from individuals experiencing these Judicial issues.

I leave you with this thought. Corrupt Judges, train law clerks to become corrupt lawyers, who become corrupt legislators, making laws to corrupt, and appointing corrupt State judges. More often than not one of these lawyer legislators becomes President and then gets to appoint Federal Judges and Supreme Court judges who are voted in primarily by Lawyers turned legislators. This is the epitome of a good ole boy crony capitalist network. Is it an illuminati conspiracy?  You have an obligation as an American citizen to become aware of the depth of this problem. Update 1-17-2016. September 28, 1820 Thomas Jefferson expressed his concerns about this very issue as he wrote in a letter to William Jarvis on the subject of Judicial review.

 “You seem … to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so. They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps…. Their power [is] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves”

Update 1-19-2016 Now look at this!

Bill Clinton Judicial Appointments.

Congress has been unwilling to allow nominations from President Obama to be confirmed. See Senate conservatives no more appointments 

Update 3-5-2016 Watch this video on the Assignation of John Kennedy Jr. Are those in this video in conspiracy with the Clintons? Who was President when John died? Which Senators were involved in Piggford v. Glickman?  Sherrod Brown Statement on Passage: ” Sherrod Brown was an original co-sponsor of the Pigford Claims Remedy Act along with President Barack Obama, Vice President Joseph R. Biden, and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, and Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA). The legislation would give each denied Pigford claim another chance at full determination. This February, USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack and Attorney General Eric Holder mandated that Congress appropriate the remaining funds for this settlement. Is this an opportunity for the new world order to control the country?  Are you sure you want Hillary appointing the next round of Judges and Supreme court nominees? If the Legal Profession is working with the Executive branch of Government as the facts suggest Hillary and her potential judicial appointments are a serious national security risk. ”

See the Man who survived Bill and Hillarie’s Hit 

If your into Illuminati theories look at this document on Bill Clintons Criminal Background and This Video on Hillary’s Criminal BackgroundI make no representation about the information in these links   Everything else in this post is true to the best of my knowledge. 

SeeAlso this important piece on The CLINTON Murders

UpDate May 15, 2016 Rothchilds hold 100,000  a plate fundraiser for Hillary Clinton.

 

Rockfeller and Clinton One World Order

Think very hard about whether you want another lawyer in the White House. Consider carefully all the legal questions raised about Bill & Hillary’s past and the perception they lie both have backgrounds as lawyers. I hope the country will not take the chance with Hillary  and vote for Bernie!

Update 1-22-2016 TTIP European Farmers have discovered TTIP is very bad for small farmers. Is it all part of the plan. Wipe out small farmers by ruining their business then take their land for UN Agenda goals, Gift agriculture to big Ag and bio engineered  chemical companies like monsanto? Read how TTIP is seen affecting EU agriculture. Down Fall of European Agriculture.

FeelTheBern.

Update: 1-14-2016 See why Anonymous just endorsed Bernie Sanders> Anonymous Just Announced Who They Support for President. 

Update 1-26-2016 There is more you need to know about this coming in the next bloq post. 

Update 1-29-2016 My motions to the court as well as the DOJ’s Councils notice of appearance have not been docketed. My motions which have not been answered requested the Judges attest to haven taken the judicial oath of office and to adhere to that oath through out the proceedings. The dishonorable Judge Jackson L. Kiser once threatened to refuse to docket any motion I made. Perhaps the condition is contagious! Pehaps its simply an admission of guilt. 

Update 2-12-2016 – Note read this article “Victims of the Federal Bootprint” and realize the racketeering enterprise  USDA is operating is all about denying people their Due Process Rights. How many other agencies are doing the same.

Update 3-1-2016- Is Donald Trump a Cabal member seeking to help Hillary get elected? Donald and Bill Talked Politics weeks before launching campaigns

 

CB Julian Not a Pro Pro-Se per se.

blueridgesprings.wordpress.com

Blueridgesprings.com

@blueridgespring